clopenthixol-decanoate and haloperidol-decanoate

Long-acting injectable risperidone was assessed in schizophrenia patients who were symptomatically stable on conventional depot antipsychotics and who were then switched to long-acting risperidone. Participants in this open-label, multicentre, 12-week trial had received flupenthixol decanoate, fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, or zuclopenthixol decanoate for 4 months or longer. Each was considered symptomatically stable by investigators. After receiving two cycles of their conventional depot antipsychotic during the run-in period, patients were switched to receive long-acting risperidone every 2 weeks for 12 weeks at an initial dose of 25 mg. This dose could be increased in 12.5-mg increments at 4-week intervals. Ninety-two percent of the patients received all six injections; 62% received the 25-mg dose throughout the treatment period. Adverse events related to movement disorders were reported in 3%. Severity of movement disorders decreased during long-acting risperidone treatment. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and factor scores and scores on the Clinical Global Impressions severity scale were significantly reduced during treatment; 48% of these stable patients showed further symptom improvement (> or =20% decrease in PANSS score at endpoint). The results indicate that patients with schizophrenia who are symptomatically stable during treatment with a conventional depot antipsychotic can be safely and effectively switched to long-acting injectable risperidone without a prior transition to oral risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clopenthixol; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Flupenthixol; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Zuclopenthixol decanoate (ZPT-D) and haloperidol decanoate (HAL-D) were compared in the maintenance treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients. All patients were treated with either ZPT-D or HAL-D for at least 3 months and were then randomly allocated to treatment with either ZPT-D (100-600 mg every 4 weeks) or HAL-D (38-200 mg every 4 weeks) for 9 months. Sixty-four patients entered the study. Three patients were only assessed at baseline. Four patients in the HAL-D group were withdrawn because of deterioration. One patient in the ZPT-D group committed suicide. Fifty-six patients completed the trial. The assessment programme comprised Clinical Global Impressions by psychiatrists and nurses, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), UKU Side Effect Scale and Simpson-Angus Scale, Ratings were made at baseline and after 12, 24 and 36 weeks of treatment. The severity of illness scores remained almost constant. The only between-group difference was recorded at month 6 in favour of ZPT-D. The BPRS total scores were reduced significantly in both groups with no between-group differences. The depression scores on the MADRS were very low. Both treatments caused few and mild side effects according to the UKU Side Effect Scale and the Simpson-Angus scale, and there were no significant differences between the groups. Both ZPT-D and HAL-D seem to be effective in the maintenance treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients and cause few side effects. The injections of ZPT-D and HAL-D can be given at 4-week intervals.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Clopenthixol; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors

Attempting to improve long-term neuroleptic treatment of schizophrenic patients several injectable depot neuroleptics have been developed. Moreover pharmacokinetic data increasingly have been clinically applied. On this background the purpose of the present paper has been to make an updated review of the clinical and pharmacokinetic knowledge of depot neuroleptic treatment. First, general aspects of antipsychotics have been summarized, and an outline of methodological questions relevant to clinical-pharmacological trials are given. Subsequently general aspects including pros & cons of depot administration are examined. Finally the available data of the various depot preparations have been scrutinized. It is concluded that our present pharmacokinetic knowledge of the particular preparations is incomplete. Thus more information of clinical relevant aspects are needed, e.g., the existence of a therapeutic range, maximum/minimum concentration ratio, and the significance of active metabolites. Comparing the various depot neuroleptics, no significant differences are seen regarding the clinical effects. However, the decanoate esters seem clinical superior to the corresponding enanthate esters explained by the more flat concentration curve of the decanoates. Apart from that, a comparison of the pharmacokinetic data is difficult because of the heterogenecy of the available data. Haloperidol, clopenthixol and perphenazine decanoates are among the best examined preparations in pharmacokinetic respects. A controlled double-blind comparative study of these preparations would be of interest.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Clopenthixol; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Flupenthixol; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Humans; Kinetics; Long-Term Care; Patient Compliance; Perphenazine; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazines