clazosentan and tezosentan

Bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan are three small-molecule endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), displacing endothelin-1 (ET-1) from its binding site. A target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) pharmacokinetic (PK) model described the non-linearity in the PK of bosentan caused by its high receptor binding affinity with time-dependent varying receptor expression or reappearance. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the presence of TMDD for clazosentan and tezosentan and to corroborate the hypothesis of a diurnal receptor synthesis.. PK data from healthy subjects after intravenous (i.v.) administration of single ascending doses of bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan were analyzed. Frequent blood samples for PK measurements were collected. Population analyses, simulations, and evaluations were performed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach.. Two-compartment TMDD models were successfully developed describing the PK of all three ERAs with different receptor-complex internalization properties. The observed multiple peaks in the concentration-time profiles were captured with cosine functions on the receptor synthesis rate mimicking a diurnal receptor expression or reappearance. The results strongly suggest that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.. The developed TMDD PK models are a next step towards understanding the complex PK of ERAs and further support the hypothesis that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

Topics: Bosentan; Dioxanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Endothelin; Sulfonamides; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tetrazoles

1. The effects of changes in mean and pulsatile shear stress on the diameter of the iliac of the anaesthetized pig were investigated in the presence of clazosentan and tezosentan. 2. A total of 17 pigs were used. Mean shear stress was increased by infusing acetylcholine downstream (2-20 μg/min) through the deep femoral artery. Pulsatile shear stress was enhanced first by injecting varying volumes (1-10 mL) of calcium gluconate (stock 10 mg/mL) directly into the left ventricle. Second, by electrical stimulation of the left sympathetic nerves to the heart (1-16 Hz, 4 min duration, supramaximal voltage). 3. An increase in mean shear stress induced a vasodilation that was not altered significantly by the selective endothelin A antagonist clazosentan (10 mg/kg i.v.). Similarly, the vasoconstriction induced by an increase in pulsatile shear stress brought about by either calcium gluconate injections or left sympathetic nerve stimulation was unaffected by clazosentan. However, tezosentan (10 mg/kg i.v.), significantly attenuated the vasoconstriction induced by an increase in pulsatile shear stress. 4. In conclusion, an increase in pulsatile shear stress causes vasoconstriction of the pig iliac artery, which is attenuated by dual endothelin receptor antagonism, but not by specific endothelin A blockade.

Topics: Anesthesia; Animals; Blood Pressure; Dioxanes; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Heart Rate; Iliac Artery; Pulsatile Flow; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Stress, Mechanical; Sulfonamides; Swine; Tetrazoles; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilator Agents