ciclesonide and montelukast

ciclesonide has been researched along with montelukast* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for ciclesonide and montelukast

ArticleYear
Effects of 24-week add-on treatment with ciclesonide and montelukast on small airways inflammation in asthma.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2013, Volume: 110, Issue:3

    Eosinophilic inflammation of the small airways is a key process in asthma that often smolders in treated patients. The long-term effects of add-on therapy on the persistent inflammation in the small airways remain unknown.. To examine the effects of add-on therapy with either ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid with extrafine particles, or montelukast on small airway inflammation.. Sixty patients with stable asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroid treatment were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, parallel comparison study of 24-week add-on treatment with ciclesonide or montelukast. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: ciclesonide (n = 19), montelukast (n = 22), or no add-on as controls (n = 19). At baseline and at weeks 4, 12, and 24, extended nitric oxide analysis; pulmonary function tests, including impulse oscillometry; blood eosinophil counts; and asthma control tests (ACTs) were performed.. A total of 18 patients in the ciclesonide group, 19 in the montelukast group, and 15 in the control group completed the study and were analyzed. With repeated-measures analysis of variance, ciclesonide produced a significant decrease in alveolar nitric oxide and a significant improvement in ACT scores over time. Montelukast produced significant decreases in alveolar nitric oxide concentrations and blood eosinophil counts over time and slightly improved ACT scores, whereas no such changes were observed in the control group. Alveolar nitric oxide concentrations with ciclesonide and reactance area at low frequencies with montelukast produced greater improvements over time compared with control.. Ciclesonide add-on therapy and montelukast add-on therapy may act differently, but both separately can improve small airway abnormalities and provide better asthma control.. umin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000001083.

    Topics: Acetates; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Cell Count; Cell Movement; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eosinophils; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitric Oxide; Pregnenediones; Pulmonary Alveoli; Quinolines; Respiratory Function Tests; Sulfides

2013

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for ciclesonide and montelukast

ArticleYear
Effect of ciclesonide on bronchial asthma in athletes.
    The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2009, Volume: 46, Issue:10

    Although it is well established that the incidence of bronchial asthma is higher in the athlete population than in the general population, little information exists about the efficacy of treatment of bronchial asthma in the athlete population.. We conducted this study with the objective of determining the efficacy of treatment of bronchial asthma in an athlete population living in Niigata Prefecture, Japan.. We conducted a retrospective study of bronchial asthma in an athlete population. Athletes diagnosed as having asthma, based on the Global Initiatives for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, who visited the Niigata Institute for Health and Sports Medicine between January 2007 and June 2008 were enrolled in this study. We compared two groups of patients, a group treated with ciclesonide (CIC) alone and another treated with montelukast alone, with the treatment duration lasting at least 3 months in both groups. The CIC or montelukast groups were compared in terms of the clinical symptoms, pulmonary function parameters, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO).. There were no significant differences in the sex distribution, age, frequency of symptoms, pulmonary function parameters, or other examination data before treatment between the CIC and montelukast groups. The CIC group tended to show better symptom control and to need fewer changes of treatment than the montelukast group. While improvements of the pulmonary function parameters and FENO values were observed in the CIC group, no significant changes of these parameters were observed in the montelukast group.. These data suggest that CIC offers greater promise for the control of asthma than montelukast in the athlete population, although further investigation is required.

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Asthma; Athletes; Breath Tests; Cyclopropanes; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate; Nitric Oxide; Pregnenediones; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfides; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity; Young Adult

2009