ceritinib and alectinib

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Disease Management; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

The identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in 2-5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer led to rapid advances in the clinical development of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors are an effective treatment in preclinical models and patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-translocated cancers. Four anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib) have recently been approved. Post-marketing studies provided additional pharmacokinetic information on their pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic properties of approved anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors have been reviewed herein. Findings from additional studies on the effects of drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and drug-drug interactions have been incorporated. Crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib reach their maximum plasma concentrations after approximately 6 h and brigatinib after 1-4 h. These drugs are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A with other cytochrome P450 enzymes. They are mainly excreted in the feces, with only a minor fraction being eliminated in urine. Crizotinib, ceritinib, and brigatinib are substrates for the adenosine triphosphate binding-cassette transporter B1, whereas alectinib is not. The different substrate specificities of the transporters play a key role in superior blood-brain barrier penetration by alectinib than by crizotinib and ceritinib. Although the absorption, distribution, and excretion of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors are regulated by drug transporters, their transporter-mediated pharmacokinetics have not yet been elucidated in detail in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Further research to analyze the contribution of drug transporters to the pharmacokinetics of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer will be helpful for understanding the mechanisms of the inter-individual differences in the pharmacokinetics of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Interactions; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Membrane Transport Proteins; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

Activation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene has been found in several human cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, novel drugs targeting ALK gene have been extensively investigated in NSCLC. However, concerns about ALK inhibitors-induced liver toxicities have been increasing.. Eligible prospective clinical studies have been searched in several databases. Primary outcomes of interest were incidence rates of liver toxicities, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. Data from 2418 patients (1873 in the experimental arm; 545 in the control arm) were included. The incidences of all-grade alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation were 26.0% (95% CI: 17.4%-37%), and 23.2% (95% CI, 16.7%-31.4%), respectively. The incidences of high-grade ALT and AST elevation were 8.4% (95% CI, 5.1%-13.4% and 7.0% (95% CI: 5.4%-9.0%), respectively. Sub-group analysis according to the ALK inhibitors found that pooled incidence of liver toxicities associated with ceritinib was higher than that of crizotinib and alectinib. In comparison with chemotherapy, ALK inhibitors significantly increased the all-grade and high-grade ALT elevation (RR 2.37, 95% CI, 1.97-2.86; P < .001; RR 7.34, 95% CI, 3.95-13.63; P < .001) and AST elevation (RR 3.27, 95% CI, 2.47-4.34; P < .001; RR 11.54, 95% CI, 4.33-30.7; P < .001), respectively. No publication bias was detected for RR of ALT and AST.. The findings of the present study offer substantial evidence that ALK inhibitors treatment in advanced NSCLC significantly increases the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade liver toxicities in comparison with controls. Clinicians should recognize liver toxicities promptly as early interventions may alleviate future complications.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Incidence; Liver; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Risk Factors; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene activation is involved in the carcinogenesis process of several human cancers such as anaplastic large cell lymphoma, lung cancer, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors and neuroblastoma, as a consequence of fusion with other oncogenes (NPM, EML4, TIM, etc) or gene amplification, mutation or protein overexpression. ALK is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor that, upon ligand binding to its extracellular domain, undergoes dimerization and subsequent autophosphorylation of the intracellular kinase domain. When activated in cancer it represents a target for specific inhibitors, such as crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib etc. which use has demonstrated significant effectiveness in ALK-positive patients, in particular ALK-positive non- small cell lung cancer. Several mechanisms of resistance to these inhibitors have been described and new strategies are underway to overcome the limitations of current ALK inhibitors.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

Despite significant advancements in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since the advent of crizotinib, the development of acquired resistance and poor CNS efficacy have necessitated the search for novel and more robust therapies. Ensartinib (X-396) is a novel second-generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that holds much clinical promise. Preclinical data have demonstrated increased potency of the drug as compared with crizotinib and other second-generation ALK-TKI therapies such as alectinib and ceritinib. This review highlights the first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors approved for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC and discusses the clinical trial protocol for the eXalt3 trial (NCT02767804) comparing the efficacy and safety of ensartinib to crizotinib in patients diagnosed with ALK-positive NSCLC who are naive to prior ALK-TKI treatment.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Piperazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Sulfones; Treatment Outcome

The discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2007 led to the development and subsequent approval of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib in 2011. However, despite its clinical efficacy, resistance to crizotinib invariably develops. There is now a next generation of ALK inhibitors, including two that have been approved-ceritinib and alectinib-and others that are in development-brigatinib, lorlatinib and X-396. Ceritinib and the other next-generation ALK inhibitors are more potent than crizotinib and can overcome tumor cell resistance mechanisms. Ceritinib gained US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2014 following accelerated review for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. In pre-clinical studies, it demonstrated more potent inhibition of ALK than crizotinib in enzymatic assays, more durable responses in xenograft models and the ability to potently overcome crizotinib resistance mutations in vitro (including the gatekeeper mutation). There is also evidence for ceritinib penetration across the blood-brain barrier. In clinical trials, ceritinib has demonstrated durable responses and progression-free survival in ALK-inhibitor-pre-treated and -naïve NSCLC patients, including high overall and intracranial response rates in those with central nervous system metastases. Selective gastrointestinal toxicity of ceritinib, such as diarrhea, nausea and vomiting is generally manageable with prophylactic medication and prompt dose reduction or interruption. Future progress in treating ALK+ NSCLC will focus on determining the optimal sequencing of therapies and strategies to overcome acquired resistance, an ongoing challenge in treating ALK-mutation-driven tumors.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have been administered to patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer for a long period of time and show a promising response. However, the differences in the toxicity profiles among these drugs are still unclear.. We performed a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE and COCHRANE databases from the drugs' inception to May 2016 to identify clinical trials. Severe adverse events (AEs) (grade ≥ 3) based on the ALK-TKI type were analysed.. Seventeen trials published between 2011 and 2016, including a total of 1826 patients, were eligible for analysis. Patients in 10 trials (n = 1000) received crizotinib, patients in 5 trials (n = 601) received ceritinib and patients in 2 trials (n = 225) received alectinib. The overall frequencies of treatment-related death and AEs due to treatment withdrawal were 0.9% (12/1365) and 5.5% (85/1543), respectively. Moreover, the frequency of severe AEs in patients treated with ceritinib was significantly higher than patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib, especially for hepatotoxicity, fatigue and some of gastrointestinal symptoms. Additionally, significant difference in the elevated lipase and amylase levels (grade ≥ 3) were detected between ceritinib and crizotinib/alectinib, whereas neutropenia was less frequent.. ALK-TKIs were safe for ALK-positive patients. Moreover, statistically significant differences in some severe AEs among ceritinib, crizotinib and alectinib were detected in present study.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Patient Safety; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

ALK translocation is the 3rd most frequent genetic aberration in lung adenocarcinoma, and several inhibitors are now clinically available in first and second line settings. Accordingly, molecular diagnostics of ALK-positive lung cancer is very important and can be done with the rational combination of several methods. All international recommendations suggest that, except for cytological samples, screening technology for ALK-positive tumors is immunohistochemistry using a validated test. It is highly recommended that in case of ALK protein positive samples gene translocation must be confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In case of cytological samples FISH technique must be used as ALK diagnostics. In equivocal cases the genetic alteration of ALK can be confirmed by alternative molecular techniques such as next generation sequencing or RNAbased PCR methods. Upon administration of ALK inhibitors, acquired resistance is frequent which is mostly due to ALK amplification and/or mutation. It is evident that the diagnostics of these secondary ALK gene alterations must be done from recurrent tumors or circulating nucleic acids.. Az ALK gén transzlokációja a harmadik leggyakoribb, terápiás szempontból hasznosítható genetikai eltérés a tüdõ adenokarcinómáiban, és manapság már elsõ- és másodvonalú terápiákban több inhibitor áll rendelkezésre. Ezen okoknál fogva nagy jelentõsége van az ALK-pozitív tüdõrák molekuláris diagnosztikájának, amit több módszer racionális kombinációjával lehet végezni. A nemzetközi ajánlások megegyeznek abban, hogy a citológiai minták kivételével más típusú formalinfixált, paraffinos anyagok esetében az ALK-pozitív esetek szûrése a protein kimutatásának validált immunhisztokémiai módszerével történik. Az ALK proteinre pozitív esetekben a géntranszlokáció jelenlétét fluoreszcens in situ hibridizációval (FISH) célszerû megerõsíteni. Citológiai minták esetében az ALK gén transzlokációját elsõdlegesen FISH-módszerrel kell végezni. A kérdéses eredményû esetekben a genetikai eltérés tisztázására újgenerációs szekvenálást vagy RNS-alapú PCR-technikákat lehet alkalmazni. Az ALK-inhibitorok klinikai alkalmazása során gyakran alakul ki rezisztencia, aminek leggyakoribb oka az ALK gén amplifikációja és/vagy mutációi. Ezek molekuláris diagnosztikájának alapja a recidív daganatszövet vagy a vérben keringõ nukleinsav kell, hogy legyen.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Biopsy, Needle; Carbazoles; Crizotinib; Early Detection of Cancer; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Hungary; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Risk Assessment; Sulfones; Survival Analysis; Translocation, Genetic; Treatment Outcome

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements occur in a small portion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These gene rearrangements lead to constitutive activation of the ALK kinase and subsequent ALK-driven tumor formation. Patients with tumors harboring such rearrangements are highly sensitive to ALK inhibitors, such as crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Resistance to these kinase inhibitors occurs through several mechanisms, resulting in ongoing clinical challenges. This review summarizes the biology of ALK-positive lung cancer, methods for diagnosing ALK-positive NSCLC, current FDA-approved ALK inhibitors, mechanisms of resistance to ALK inhibition, and potential strategies to combat resistance.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Proteins; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Crizotinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (-TKI) that represents the standard first-line treatment of patients with ALK-rearranged (ALK-positive) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this setting, crizotinib has demonstrated a response rate of roughly 75% and a median progression-free survival just under one year. However, acquired resistance will emerge in virtually all crizotinib-treated patients, whose management may require a diversified approach according to the pace of the disease and/or the site(s) of disease progression. Crizotinib beyond disease progression is an option in patients with oligoprogressive disease, especially in presence of isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse, provided that local ablative therapy (mainly radiotherapy) to the brain is administered. On the other hand, novel more potent and highly selective ALK-TKIs with demonstrated anti-tumor activity (CNS included) in crizotinib-refractory patients have been made available in recent years. Therefore, clinicians may well consider switching to a second-generation ALK-TKI as treatment option in case of progression on crizotinib. Therapeutic chances are more limited for patients who progress after crizotinib and a second-generation ALK-TKI, for whom both a third-generation ALK-TKI or pemetrexed-based chemotherapy could prove beneficial, while evidence in support of the use of immunotherapy in patients pretreated with ≥1 ALK-TKI is lacking.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Prevalence; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Crizotinib as the first-generation ALK inhibitor has shown significant activity in ALK-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors are entering clinical applications for ALK+ NSCLC. In addition, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, lorlatinib (PF-06463922), was reported to resensitize NSCLC to crizotinib. This review provided a summary of clinical development of alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib (AP26113), and lorlatinib.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Secondary anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation may occur in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with ALK inhibitors, but its nature is not well-known.. We analyzed tumor specimens after the failure of treatment with ALK inhibitor(s) (crizotinib, alectinib, and ceritinib) for secondary ALK kinase domain mutation, EGFR, K-ras, and PIK3CA mutations. The literature regarding acquired ALK-inhibitor(s) resistance was also reviewed.. Among 59 patients who received ALK inhibitor(s) during the period of December 2010 to April 2015, 7 had re-biopsied tumor specimens for analyses following ALK inhibitor(s) failure. One had G1202R after crizotinib and alectinib failure, and 6 were wild type. No EGFR, K-ras, or PIK3CA mutations were found. In our review of the literature and taken together with our patients, 25 of the 88 (28%) patients with crizotinib failure had secondary ALK mutation; L1196M mutation was most common (n = 11). Patients with secondary ALK mutation other than L1196M had a longer progression-free survival after crizotinib than patients with L1196M (median, 12.0 vs. 7.0 months; P = .04). Of the 9 patients with alectinib failure, 5 had I1171 mutation and 2 had G1202R. Of the 11 patients with ceritinib failure, 2 had G1202R, 1 had F1174C, and 1 had both G1202R and F1174V. I1171 mutation, G1202R, and F1174 mutations were also found in crizotinib-failed patients.. Some acquired ALK mutations may cause co-resistance to other ALK inhibitors. Re-biopsy for ALK mutation analysis might be suggested prior to choosing a second-line ALK inhibitor treatment.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones; Treatment Failure

The identification of the EML4-ALK rearrangement in 5% of NSCLC enhanced the development of 1st generation ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib. Two phase III trials demonstrated crizotinib efficacy in second line metastatic (PROFILE 1007) and more recently first line metastatic (PROFILE 1014) NSCLC in terms of progression-free survival and also objective response. However, within 12 to 16 months, patients will progress due to the emergence of acquired resistance mechanisms such as mutation (L1196M) or amplification of the ALK gene, as well as activation of alternative signaling pathways (EGFR, KRAS). Second generation ALK inhibitors have been developed such as ceritinib, alectinib, and AP26113. This review will present those new drugs, summarize the results of their ongoing trials, and discuss the best way to treat ALK+ NSCLC patients.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

With therapeutic approaches based on oncogene addiction offering significant anticancer benefit, the identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is a key aspect of the management of lung cancers. The EML4-ALK gene fusion is detected in 4-8% of all lung cancers, predominantly in light smokers or nonsmokers. Crizotinib, the first agent to be approved in this indication, is associated with a median progression-free survival of 10.9 months when given as first-line treatment and 7.7 months when administered after chemotherapy. Median overall survival with crizotinib in the second-line setting is 20.3 months. Second-generation ALK inhibitors are currently being evaluated, with early studies giving impressive results, notably in patients resistant to crizotinib or with brain metastases. Among available chemotherapies, pemetrexed appears to be particularly active in this population. Despite this progress, several questions remain unanswered. What detection strategies should be favoured? What underlies the mechanisms of resistance and what options are available to overcome them? What are the best approaches for progressing patients? This review provides an overview of current data in the literature and addresses these questions.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Smoking; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been identified to exert a potent transforming activity through its rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and patients (pts) with ALK rearrangement can be treated more successfully with ALK inhibitors, such as crizotinib, alectinib, and ceritinib, than with chemotherapy. Despite the excellent efficacy of ALK inhibitors, resistance to these drugs is inevitably encountered in most ALK-rearranged pts. Cases of resistance are subtyped into three groups, i.e., systemic, oligo, and central nervous system (CNS) types, with the CNS being used to be considered a sanctuary. With regard to the management of CNS lesions in pts with ALK+ NSCLC, a growing body of evidence has gradually demonstrated the intracranial (IC) efficacy of ALK inhibitor (ALKi) in ALK+ NSCLC pts with brain metastases (BMs). Although the efficacy of crizotinib for the CNS lesions remains controversial, a recent retrospective investigation of ALK+ pts with BM enrolled in PROFILE 1005 and PROFILE 1007 demonstrated that crizotinib is associated with a high disease control rate for BM. However, BM comprises the most common site of progressive disease in pts with or without baseline BMs, which is a serious problem for crizotinib. Furthermore, alectinib can be used to achieve strong and long-lasting inhibitory effects on BM. In addition to alectinib, the IC efficacy of other next-generation ALK inhibitors, such as ceritinib, AP26113 and PF-06463922, has been demonstrated. In this article, we review the latest evidence regarding the BM and IC efficacy of ALK inhibitors in pts with ALK+ NSCLC.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been found to fuse with other partners, such as echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4), leading to potent malignant transformation in lung cancer, specifically non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The frequency of the ALK rearrangement in patients with NSCLC is reported to be 4-7%, and the rearrangement is frequently observed in relatively younger patients, non- or light smokers and those with adenocarcinoma histology without other genetic disorders, such as mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene. Crizotinib, which is a first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was shown to be effective and well tolerated in ALK-positive NSCLC patients by a single-arm phase I study. Furthermore, a phase III randomized study demonstrated the superiority of crizotinib to standard chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) in the treatment of NSCLC patients harboring the ALK rearrangement who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib are major concerns when administering crizotinib to ALK-positive NSCLC patients, and they include second mutations and a gain in the copy number of the ALK gene, activation of other oncogenes, etc. Treatment strategies to overcome these mechanisms of resistance have been developed, including the use of second-generation ALK inhibitors, such as alectinib and ceritinib, heat shock protein 90 inhibitors and so on. In this article, we review the pre-clinical and clinical data regarding the biologal and clinical significance of the ALK rearrangement in lung cancer.

Topics: Age Factors; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Crizotinib; ErbB Receptors; Gene Fusion; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Microtubule-Associated Proteins; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Serine Endopeptidases; Smoking; Sulfones

Lay abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitor medications (like crizotinib, alectinib or ceritinib) may work as the first treatment for people with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has spread to other parts of the body and has the ALK+ mutation (ALK+ NSCLC) in tumor testing. However, after a while, many people stop responding to treatment with one of these medicines. Brigatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor medicine that may be effective in people with ALK+ NSCLC who have stopped responding to alectinib or ceritinib treatment. We describe the need for and design of a study of brigatinib in people with ALK+ NSCLC whose disease got worse on alectinib or ceritinib.

Topics: Adult; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Sulfones

If anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement in lung cancer is identified, ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) can be an effective treatment. However, the details of drug-induced lung injury (DILI) caused by ALK-TKI, which can be a serious side effect of ALK-TKIs, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and the onset risk factors of DILI by ALK-TKIs in clinical practice.. The clinical features of 56 consecutive patients who received crizotinib, alectinib, and/or ceritinib at our hospital from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively examined. Among these, patients diagnosed with DILI due to ALK-TKIs were evaluated in terms of clinical features and parameters. Each clinical parameter before the administration of ALK-TKIs was compared between the DILI onset group and the non-onset group.. A total of seven cases were diagnosed with DILI due to ALK-TKIs; no DILI-related deaths were observed. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan findings identified six patients with the organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern and one with the hypersensitivity pneumonia pattern. The onset of DILI was significantly different in patients age ≥ 64 years and with a creatinine clearance <80 mL/minute.. Extra caution for DILI due to ALK-TKIs may be needed when recommending ALK-TKIs for patients over 64 years of age, or with decreased renal function. CT images of the majority of patients with DILI by ALK-TKIs show an OP pattern.. Significant findings of the study: Extra caution is needed when recommending ALK-TKIs for patients over 64 years of age or those with decreased renal function. Computed tomography images of the majority of patients with DILI by ALK-TKIs show an OP pattern.. The same or a different ALK-TKI may be considered as a treatment option after the onset of DILI, based on careful judgment.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Crizotinib; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lung Injury; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sulfones; Survival Rate

The second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor brigatinib has recently been approved in the European Union for use after crizotinib treatment in patients with EML4-ALK-rearranged lung cancer. In the current study, brigatinib was investigated as second-line or later-line treatment in 35 patients who had developed resistance to crizotinib, ceritinib, or alectinib. Most patients (68.6%) received brigatinib as second or third line (range: second to 12th line). In the total cohort, complete and partial responses were obtained for 9.1 and 75.8%, respectively. Overall median progression-free survival was 9.9 months, whereas the largest treatment cohort (brigatinib after crizotinib failure) showed a median progression-free survival of 8.4 months. Fifty-four percent of patients with baseline brain metastases responded to brigatinib treatment. Brigatinib was highly effective after crizotinib and ceritinib failure. Six patients had received alectinib as monotherapy, second-line, or third line before brigatinib; of these, four experienced partial responses and two progressed responses. Brigatinib treatment was well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Prognosis; Pyrimidines; Salvage Therapy; Sulfones; Survival Rate

To compare the overall survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received alectinib with those who received ceritinib.. Two treatment arms (alectinib [n = 183] and ceritinib [n = 67]) were extracted from clinical trials and an electronic health record database, respectively. Propensity scores were applied to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were conducted.. After propensity score adjustment, baseline characteristics were balanced. Alectinib had a prolonged median overall survival (alectinib = 24.3 months and ceritinib = 15.6 months) and lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48-0.88).. Alectinib was associated with prolonged overall survival versus ceritinib, which is consistent with efficacy evidence from clinical trials.

Topics: Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Propensity Score; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Clinical experience of ceritinib in patients who progressed on alectinib is limited. In this prospective phase II study, we evaluated the activity of ceritinib in alectinib-pretreated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. All patients were required to have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST, 1.1, and a World Health Organization Performance Status (WHO PS) of 0-1. Prior crizotinib and/or up to 1 chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Ceritinib was given at a dose of 750 mg/day fasted. A total of 20 patients were enrolled from August 2015 to March 2017. All patients received prior alectinib (100%), 13 (65.0%) patients received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, and 4 (20%) patients received prior crizotinib. Median duration of exposure and the follow-up time with ceritinib were 3.7 months (range: 0.4-15.1) and 11.6 months (range: 4.8-23.0), respectively. Investigator-assessed ORR was 25% (95% CI: 8.7-49.1). Key secondary endpoints, all investigator assessed, included disease control rate (70.0%; 95% CI: 45.7-88.1), time to response (median, 1.8 months; range: 1.8-2.0), and duration of response (median, 6.3 months; 95% CI: 3.5-9.2). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9-5.3). The most common adverse events reported were diarrhea (85.0%), nausea (80.0%), and vomiting (65.0%). Based on our findings, ceritinib could be considered as one of the treatment options for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on alectinib. (Trial registration no. NCT02450903).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Introduction Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) targeting drugs provide an important option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with this distinct tumor type; however, there is considerable uncertainty as to which drug provides the optimal value after crizotinib treatment. This study estimated the cost-utility of alectinib vs ceritinib from a US payer perspective. Methods A cost-utility model was developed using partition survival methods and three health states: progression-free (PF), post-progression (PP), and death. Survival data were derived from the key clinical trials (alectinib: NP28761 & NP28673, ceritinib: ASCEND I and II). Costs included drugs, adverse events, and supportive care. Utilities were based on trial data and the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results Treatment with alectinib vs ceritinib resulted in increases of 2.55 months in the PF state, 0.44 quality adjusted life-years (QALYs), and $13,868, yielding a mean cost/QALY of $31,180. In the PSA, alectinib had a 96% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY. Drivers of model results were drug costs and utilities in the PF health state. The ICER ranged from $10,600-$65,000 per QALY in scenario analyses, including a sub-group analysis limited to patients with prior chemotherapy and crizotinib treatment. Conclusions Treatment with alectinib in ALK + crizotinib-treated patients increased time progression-free and QALYs vs ceritinib. The marginal cost increase was driven by longer treatment durations with alectinib. This model demonstrates that alectinib may be considered a cost-effective treatment after progression on crizotinib.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones; Survival Analysis

Topics: Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Topics: Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Brigatinib is a potent next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment-naive and crizotinib-refractory advanced ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. We evaluated brigatinib after other next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors.. In this single-arm, phase 2, ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2 (NCT03535740), patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC whose disease progressed on alectinib or ceritinib received brigatinib 180 mg once daily (after 7-d 90-mg lead-in). Primary end point was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was analyzed.. Among 103 patients (data cutoff: September 30, 2020; median follow-up [range]: 10.8 [0.5-17.7] mo), confirmed IRC-ORR was 26.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.0-35.8), median duration of response, 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.6-not reached), and median progression-free survival (mPFS), 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.5-5.8). mPFS was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7) in patients with ctDNA-detectable baseline ALK fusion (n = 64). Among 86 patients who progressed on alectinib, IRC-ORR was 29.1% (95% CI: 19.8-39.9); mPFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 1.9-5.4). Resistance mutations were present in 33.3% (26 of 78) of baseline ctDNA; 54% (14 of 26) of mutations were G1202R; 52% (33 of 64) of patients with detectable ALK fusion had EML4-ALK variant 3. Most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events were increased creatine phosphokinase (32%) and diarrhea (27%). The mean dose intensity of brigatinib (180 mg once daily) was 85.9%.. In ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2, brigatinib was found to have a limited activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC post-ceritinib or post-alectinib therapy. mPFS was longer with brigatinib in patients without baseline detectable plasma ALK fusion.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Six anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), including one domestic (ensartinib) and five imported ALK-TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib), have been recommended as first-line treatments for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in China. This study sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of these six novel therapies in Chinese patients.. We constructed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of the six ALK-TKIs as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Transition probabilities were estimated by synthesizing data from the PROFILE 1,029 trial and a network meta-analysis. Health state utilities and costs were sourced from published literature, publicly available national databases, and local general hospitals. The robustness of model was assessed. Compared with crizotinib, ensartinib achieved additional 0.12 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) with marginal costs of $3,249, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $27,553/ QALY. When compared with ceritinib and brigatinib, ensartinib achieved additional 0.06 and 0.03 QALYs with substantially reduced costs. When compared with lorlatinib and alectinib, ensartinib was associated with a lower QALY and decreased total costs; the ICERs for lorlatinib and alectinib were $934,101/ QALY and $164,888/ QALY, respectively.. For Chinese patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, ensartinib was a cost-effective option compared with crizotinib, and was a dominant alternative to ceritinib and brigatinib. Although lorlatinib and alectinib were associated with prolonged survival compared with ensartinib, they were less cost-effective than ensartinib due to the overwhelming total costs.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Crizotinib; Humans; Lactams; Lung Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

Fusion proteins of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are promising therapeutic targets for cancer and other human diseases, especially for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (ALCLs). We described herein a structure-based design, synthesis, and evaluation of ALK PROTACs (proteolysis-targeting chimeras) based on Alectinib as the warhead. We firstly screened CRBN ligands as the E3 ligase moiety, then obtained a series of potent ALK degraders based on different CRBN ligands, exemplified by SIAIS091 and SIAIS001 with lenalidomide/thalidomide-based linkers. Both of them induced effective ALK degradation at low nanomolar concentrations in cells, and showed much better growth inhibition effects than Alectinib. SIAIS091 or SIAIS001 also promoted cell cycle arrest in G1/S phase. Finally, SIAIS001 exhibited good oral bioavailability in Pharmacokinetics study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Availability; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Discovery; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Structure; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Structure-Activity Relationship

Quantitative assessment of bias from unmeasured confounding and missing data can help evaluate uncertainty in findings from indirect comparisons using real-world data (RWD).. To compare the effectiveness of alectinib vs ceritinib in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with ALK-positive, crizotinib-refractory, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to assess the sensitivity of these findings to unmeasured confounding and missing data assumptions.. This comparative effectiveness research study compared patients from 2 phase 2 alectinib trials and real-world patients. Patients were monitored from June 2013 to March 2020. Comparisons of interest were between alectinib trial data vs ceritinib RWD and alectinib RWD vs ceritinib RWD. RWD treatment groups were selected from nationally representative cancer data from US cancer clinics, the majority from community centers. Participants were ALK-positive patients aged 18 years or older with advanced NSCLC, prior exposure to crizotinib, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS) of 0 to 2. Data analysis was performed from October 2020 to March 2021.. Initiation of alectinib or ceritinib therapy.. The main outcome was OS.. In total, there were 355 patients: 183 (85 men [46.4%]) in the alectinib trial, 91 (43 men [47.3%]) in the ceritinib RWD group, and 81 (38 men [46.9%]) in the alectinib RWD group. Patients in the alectinib trial were younger (mean [SD] age, 52.53 [11.18] vs 57.97 [11.71] years), more heavily pretreated (mean [SD] number of prior therapy lines, 1.95 [0.72] vs 1.47 [0.81]), and had more favorable baseline ECOG PS (ECOG PS of 0 or 1, 165 patients [90.2%] vs 37 patients [77.1%]) than those in the ceritinib RWD group. The alectinib RWD group (mean [SD] age, 58.69 [11.26] years) had more patients with favorable ECOG PS (ECOG PS of 0 or 1, 49 patients [92.4%] vs 37 patients [77.1%]) and more White patients (56 patients [72.7%] vs 53 patients [62.4%]) compared with the ceritinib group. Compared with ceritinib RWD, alectinib-exposed patients had significantly longer OS in alectinib trials (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; P < .001) and alectinib RWD (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.63; P < .001) after adjustment for baseline confounders. For the worst-case HR estimate of 0.59, residual confounding by a hypothetical confounder associated with mortality and treatment by a risk ratio greater than 2.24 was required to reverse the findings. Conclusions were robust to plausible deviations from random missingness for missing ECOG PS and underrecorded comorbidities and central nervous system metastases in RWD.. Alectinib exposure was associated with longer OS compared with ceritinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, and only substantial levels of bias examined reversed the findings. These findings suggest that quantitative bias analysis can be a useful tool to address uncertainty of findings for decision-makers considering RWD.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones; Survival Analysis

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common, but extremely malignant, brain tumor; thus, the development of novel therapeutic strategies for GBMs is imperative. Many tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for various cancers, yet none has demonstrated clinical benefit against GBM. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is confirmed only during the embryonic development period in humans. In addition, various ALK gene alterations are known to act as powerful oncogenes and therapeutic targets in various tumors. The antitumor activity of various TKIs was tested against three human GBM cell lines (U87MG, LN229, and GSC23), which expressed substantially low ALK levels; second-generation ALK inhibitors, alectinib and ceritinib, effectively induced GBM cell death. In addition, treatment with either alectinib or ceritinib modulated the activation of various molecules downstream of RTK signaling and induced caspase-dependent/-independent cell death mainly by inhibiting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation in human GBM cells. In addition, alectinib and ceritinib also showed antitumor activity against a U87MG cell line with acquired temozolomide resistance. Finally, oral administration of alectinib and ceritinib prolonged the survival of mice harboring intracerebral GBM xenografts compared with controls. These results suggested that treatment with the second-generation ALK inhibitors, alectinib and ceritinib, might serve as a potent therapeutic strategy against GBM.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glioblastoma; Humans; Mice; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfones; Temozolomide; Treatment Outcome; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring is a promising approach for the rational use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous determination of 5 EGFR-TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib) and 3 ALK inhibitors (alectinib, ceritinib, and crizotinib).. A 100-mL aliquot of serum was diluted with 100 μL of 1% aqueous ammonia containing internal standards and then purified using the supported liquid extraction method. LC-MS/MS was conducted in positive ionization mode, and the method was validated according to published guidelines.. Calibration curves were linear across concentration ranges examined. The intra- and interassay accuracies were 90.7%-110.7% and 94.7%-107.6%, respectively. All intra- and interassay imprecision values were ≤10.1%. The EGFR-TKIs and ALK inhibitors examined in this study, except osimertinib, which could be stored on ice for at least 5 hours, were stable at room temperature for 3 hours. For the internal standard-normalized matrix factors, the mean recovery and percent coefficient of variation values ranged between 54%-112% and 1.7%-11.7%, respectively. This method successfully determined serum concentrations of afatinib, alectinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib in clinical samples. Serum levels of kinase inhibitors consistently reflected those reported in previous studies.. An LC-MS/MS method suitable for the simultaneous determination of 5 EGFR-TKIs and 3 ALK inhibitors in serum was developed and validated. The newly developed method enabled the determination of 5 of 8 target drugs examined in clinical samples. However, a large number of clinical samples need to be analyzed to verify the usefulness of the method.

Topics: Acrylamides; Afatinib; Aniline Compounds; Carbazoles; Chromatography, Liquid; Crizotinib; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Gefitinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinazolinones; Sulfones; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangements are found in ~ 5% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for treatment of so-called ALK-positive NSCLC. In cases of tumor progression during treatment with second-generation ALK-TKIs, such as alectinib, brigatinib, or ceritinib, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines propose a switch to lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK-TKI, or to cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, they do not mention switching to other second-generation ALK-TKIs. Here, we present a rare case of a 53-year-old Japanese woman, who had never smoked, with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who survived alectinib-resistant postoperative recurrence for 4 years by switching to ceritinib. She underwent curative resection for lung adenocarcinoma, but the cancer recurred at the bronchial stump and mediastinal lymph nodes. After platinum-doublet chemotherapy, the patient still had a single growing liver metastasis, but the tumor was found to harbor EML4-ALK rearrangement. Therefore, the patient started to take ALK-TKIs. Alectinib was the second ALK-TKI used to treat this patient. Alectinib shrank the liver metastasis, which was surgically resected. The tumor relapsed again during continued treatment with alectinib, which was switched to ceritinib. Ceritinib was effective for the relapsed tumor and treatment continued well for 4 years. This case report suggests that, in case of tumor progression during treatment with a second-generation ALK-TKI, switching to another second-generation ALK-TKI may be one of the treatment options. Further analyses are warranted to find robust markers to determine which ALK-TKI is best for each patient.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Piperidines; Pneumonectomy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

Bromelain, the aqueous extract of pineapple, has been used as a food supplement with reported nutritional and therapeutic benefits. Bromelain has anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and fibrinolytic effects. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, including alectinib (ALC), ceritinib (CER), and crizotinib (CRZ), have been efficiently used in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The solubility of ALC, CER, and CRZ is much higher at low acidic pH (pH 1) and it decreases as the pH increases affecting their absorption with a subsequent decrease in their bioavailability. It was thought that the intake of bromelain could result in a decrease in the bioavailability of ALC, CER, and CRZ due to bromelain-induced alkalizing effect following digestion. On the contrary, bromelain could possibly increase plasma exposure of the cited drugs due to its known muco-permeation enhancing effect. The therapeutic-anticancer effect of bromelain can be possibly increased/enhanced with concomitant intake of other anticancer medications or it can add to the value of food supplements for its known nutritional benefits. Thus, this work aims at studying the possibility of any PK interaction when bromelain was taken while on ALC/CER/CRZ therapy. In this work, a new UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of ALC, CER, and CRZ in rat plasma. Further application of the proposed method was performed to test the possibility of the PK interaction between bromelain and the selected ALK inhibitors in Wistar rats. Simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile was used for sample preparation. Chromatographic analysis was performed on Waters BEH™ C18 column with a mixture of acetonitrile/water containing 0.1 % formic acid (70: 30, v/v) as the mobile phase. The method permitted the analysis of ALC, CER, and CRZ in concentration ranges of 2-200, 0.4-200, and 4.0-200 ng/mL, respectively. Bromelain administration caused a significant decrease in plasma levels of CER and CRZ with lowered C

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Bromelains; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromatography, Liquid; Crizotinib; Lung Neoplasms; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sulfones; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib are approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangement. However, the mechanisms of resistance remain largely unclear.. This prospective multicenter study analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and/or cancer tissues of patients with NSCLC after progression on ALK TKI(s), using targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed.. Overall, 88 patients were enrolled; 31 cancer tissues and 90 cfDNA samples were analyzed. Five (16%) ALK mutations (L1196M ×2, I1171T, D1203N, G1269A/F1174L) and 3 possible bypass mutations (NRAS G12V, EGFR R108K, PIK3CA E545K) were found in 32 crizotinib-resistant cancers. Four (22%) ALK mutations (G1128A, G1202R, G1269A, I1171T/E1210K) and 3 possible bypass mutations (KIT D820E, MET E1012∗, EGFR P265_C291del) were found in 18 ceritinib-resistant cancers. Four (17%) ALK mutations (G1202R ×2, W1295C, G1202R/L1196M) and 1 possible bypass mutation (EGFR P753S) were found in 24 alectinib-resistant cancers. Two (11%) ALK mutations (G1202R/G1269A ×2) and 2 possible bypass mutations (BRAF V600E, MET D1246N) were found in 18 lorlatinib-resistant cancers. In patients with simultaneous paired tissue and cfDNA samples (n = 20), mutations were identified in 9 (45%) and 6 (30%) cases, respectively; the concordance rate was 45%.. The mechanisms of ALK TKI resistance were heterogeneous; ALK mutations were found in less than one-third of patients. Compound ALK mutations, which may confer lorlatinib resistance, may occur in crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib-resistant lung cancers.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Circulating Tumor DNA; Crizotinib; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Lactams; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Piperidines; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Risk Factors; Sulfones; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib improved survival in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) arrangement non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the long-term economic outcomes of using ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib are still unclear.. This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib in the Chinese healthcare setting.. A Markov model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes for the treatment of advanced NSCLC with ceritinib, alectinib or crizotinib. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the hazard ratios of ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib by pooling published trials. Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature, and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the robustness of the model outcomes. The primary outputs included total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).. Treatment with alectinib and ceritinib yielded an additional 1.00 and 1.09 QALYs and incremental costs of $62,232 and $15,165, resulting in an ICER of $62,231 and $13,905 per QALY compared with crizotinib, respectively. Parameters related to drug costs and progression-free survival were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ceritinib and alectinib had a 99.9% and 0% probability of being cost effective, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$28,410/QALY.. Our results indicate that compared with crizotinib and alectinib, ceritinib is a cost-effective option for treatment-naïve patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Crizotinib; Drug Costs; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion genes are found in 3%-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). ALK inhibitors show a very high response rate to ALK-positive NSCLCs. However, the emergence of acquired resistance is inevitable. In this study, we investigated the drugs for overcoming resistance especially compound mutations after sequential treatment with crizotinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib.. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Sanger sequencing were performed on a liver biopsy tissue obtained from a clinical case. Ba/F3 cells in which mutant EML4-ALK were overexpressed were prepared, and cell viability assay and immunoblotting were performed to check the sensitivity of five independent ALK inhibitors.. I1171S + G1269A double mutation was identified by NGS and Sanger sequencing on a liver biopsy tissue from a patient who relapsed on lorlatinib treatment. Ceritinib and brigatinib-but not other ALK inhibitors-were active against the compound mutations in the cell line model.. With the sequential ALK inhibitors treatment, cancer cells accumulate new mutations in addition to mutations acquired previously. The identified compound mutation (I1171S + G1269A) was found to be sensitive to ceritinib and brigatinib, and indeed the patient's tumor partially responded to ceritinib.. ALK compound mutation was found in a clinical sample that was resistant to lorlatinib after sequential ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Ceritinib and brigatinib are potential overcoming drugs against ALK I1171S + G1269A double mutation.

Topics: Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Apoptosis; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Proliferation; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer has been rapidly evolving since the introduction of several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) in clinical practice. However, the acquired resistance to these drugs has become an important issue. In this study, we collected a total of 112 serial biopsy samples from 32 patients with ALK-positive lung cancer during multiple ALK-TKI treatments to reveal the resistance mechanisms to ALK-TKI. Among 32 patients, 24 patients received more than two ALK-TKI. Secondary mutations were observed in 8 of 12 specimens after crizotinib failure (G1202R, G1269A, I1171T, L1196M, C1156Y and F1245V). After alectinib failure, G1202R and I1171N mutations were detected in 7 of 15 specimens. G1202R, F1174V and G1202R, and P-gp overexpression were observed in 3 of 7 samples after ceritinib treatment. L1196M + G1202R, a compound mutation, was detected in 1 specimen after lorlatinib treatment. ALK-TKI treatment duration was longer in the on-target treatment group than that in the off-target group (13.0 vs 1.2 months). In conclusion, resistance to ALK-TKI based on secondary mutation in this study was similar to that in previous reports, except for crizotinib resistance. Understanding the appropriate treatment matching resistance mechanisms contributes to the efficacy of multiple ALK-TKI treatment strategies.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Asian People; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises 5%-7% of all lung cancer and carries a good prognosis with available ALK-inhibitors. Majority of registration trials in ALK-inhibitors did not include Indian patients. Hence, this study was planned to analyze the outcome of Indian patients treated with ALK-inhibitors and associated challenges.. This is a multi-center study in 5 major tertiary care cancer centers across India treating ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients from April 2013 to April 2019. ALK rearrangement was determined by Ventana immunohistochemistry with D5F3 clone and/or by break-apart FISH. Patients treated with ALK-inhibitors in any lines of treatment were included in this study. Patients were evaluated for clinicopathologic features, patterns of ALK-inhibitors use and outcome. Progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and data were censored on April 30, 2019.. A total of 274 patients were studied, out of which 250 patients received ALK inhibitor and were analyzed further for outcome. The median age was 50 years (range: 24-82) and male to female ratio of 1.17:1. ALK was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in majority of patients (97%), 3 patients by FISH and 3 more patients were evaluated by both methods. Sixty-five percent (n = 162) of the patients received ALK-inhibitor as first line therapy, 51 patients received ALK-inhibitor as switch maintenance therapy after initial chemotherapy. Crizotinib and Ceritinib were used in 88% and 12%, respectively. One patient received Alectinib. Forty-one percent of patients had CNS progression. After median follow up of 27 months (1-72 months), the median OS was 24.7 months with OS rate of 72%, 51%, and 18% at 1, 2, and 4-years respectively. Median OS was 21.2, 26, and 38 months in the first line ALK-inhibitors use (n = 162), switch maintenance group (n = 51) and second line ALK-inhibitors use (postchemotherapy progression) (n = 33), respectively. No baseline variable predicted PFS. Presence of brain metastasis (P = 0.039) and first line ALK-inhibitors use (P = 0.032) emerged as poor prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis. PFS rate was 70%, 47%, and 31% at 6, 12, and 18 months respectively.. This is one of the largest real-world data on outcome of ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged NSCLC from Asia. In absence of second line ALK inhibitor, initial chemotherapy followed by ALK-inhibitors (switch maintenance) had better outcome. This fact may be studied in individual patient data meta-analysis. Poor performance status and brain metastases at presentation are poor prognostic factors for overall survival. Second-line ALK inhibitor use crucial for better outcome and access to clinical trials are much needed in Indian patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; India; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prognosis; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfones; Survival Rate; Young Adult

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Comorbidity; Cost of Illness; Crizotinib; Female; Health Expenditures; Health Resources; Health Services; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Regression Analysis; Residence Characteristics; Retrospective Studies; Sex Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Sulfones

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alectinib was approved in Japan in 2014 for the treatment of ALK fusion gene-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the approvals of crizotinib in 2012 and ceritinib in 2017, Japan became the first country with multiple ALK TKIs available for first-line or later use in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Here, we collected and evaluated real-world data on ALK TKI clinical usage patterns and sequencing in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC in Japan.. This retrospective observational study used the Japanese Medical Data Vision database to analyze data from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer who visited a healthcare facility in the database between April 2010 and March 2017, underwent an ALK test, received a prescription for an ALK TKI, and were at least 18 years old as of the date of the first ALK TKI prescription. There were no exclusion criteria. Descriptive analyses of demographics, baseline characteristics, ALK TKI treatment patterns and sequences, non-ALK TKI treatments received before, during, and after ALK TKI treatment, and treatment durations were reported.. A total of 378 patients met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated in mutually exclusive groups of patients receiving one, two, or three ALK TKIs. The initial ALK TKI prescribed was crizotinib for 52.1% of patients and alectinib for 47.9% of patients; however, the proportion of patients receiving alectinib as the initial ALK TKI increased over time following the Japanese approval of alectinib in 2014. Of the 117 patients who received two or three ALK TKIs, 106 received crizotinib as the first ALK TKI and 11 received alectinib. Before the date of the patient's first ALK TKI prescription, 153 of 378 patients (40.5%) had received chemotherapy. Of 104 patients who discontinued ALK therapy, 46.2% received chemotherapy and 5.8% received immunotherapy as their next treatment.. At the time of this analysis, most patients who received more than one ALK TKI received crizotinib as the initial ALK TKI. Additional ALK TKIs have since been approved in Japan as first-line or later therapeutic options for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, but the optimal sequence of ALK TKI usage remains undetermined. As new data continue to emerge, additional research will be warranted to evaluate ALK TKI sequences that do not include crizotinib as the first therapy in this patient population.

Topics: Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Japan; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Retrospective Studies; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase, is a therapeutic target in various cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer. Although several ALK inhibitors, including crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib, are approved for cancer treatment, their long-term benefit is often limited by the cancer's acquisition of resistance owing to secondary point mutations in ALK. Importantly, some ALK inhibitors cannot cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and thus have little or no efficacy against brain metastases. The introduction of a lipophilic moiety, such as a fluoroethyl group may improve the drug's BBB penetration. Herein, we report the synthesis of fluoroethyl analogues of crizotinib 1, alectinib 4, and ceritinib 9, and their radiolabeling with

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Crizotinib; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Mice; Molecular Structure; Piperidines; Positron-Emission Tomography; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Radionuclide Imaging; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfones; Tissue Distribution

Brigatinib, ceritinib, and alectinib are approved to treat crizotinib-refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no trial has compared them head-to-head. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of these agents in the crizotinib-refractory setting.. MAIC is a propensity score-type method that adjusts for differences in baseline characteristics between trials to estimate relative efficacy. Analyses were based on patient-level data from the ALTA trial for brigatinib and published summary-level trial data from ASCEND-1 and ASCEND-2 for ceritinib and NP28761 and NP28673 for alectinib. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.. After matching, all key baseline characteristics were balanced between trials. Compared with ceritinib, brigatinib was associated with longer PFS (ASCEND-1: median 15.7 vs 6.9 months, hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] = 0.38 [0.26-0.57]; ASCEND-2: median = 18.3 vs 7.2 months, HR = 0.33 [0.20-0.56]) and OS (ASCEND-1: not available; ASCEND-2: median 27.6 vs 14.9 months, HR = 0.33 [0.17-0.63]). Versus alectinib, brigatinib was associated with longer PFS (NP28761: median = 17.6 vs 8.2 months, HR = 0.56 [0.36-0.86]; NP28673: median = 17.6 vs 8.9 months, HR = 0.61 [0.40-0.93]); results for OS were inconclusive (NP28761: median = 27.6 vs 22.7 months, HR = 0.70 [0.42-1.16]; NP28673: median = 27.6 vs 26.0 months, HR = 0.66 [0.39-1.09]). ORR was similar.. In crizotinib-refractory ALK + NSCLC patients, relative efficacy estimates suggest brigatinib may have prolonged PFS and OS vs ceritinib and prolonged PFS vs alectinib.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphorus Compounds; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

Little is known regarding the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy and safety in the elderly.. Consecutive patients (n = 53) with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with an ALK TKI were identified through internal databases of three cancer centers and divided into groups A (< 65 years old; n = 34) and B (≥65 years old; n = 19). Progression-free survival (PFS), ALK TKI safety and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Uni- and multivariate PFS and OS analyses were performed.. Crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib were administered in 94 and 100%, 35 and 31%, 38 and 52% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. The median PFS (months) was 5.4 (95% CI, 3.4-12.4) and 5.6 (95% CI, 2.5-14.7) with crizotinib (log-rank 0.0009, p = 0.9), 4.7 (95% CI, 1.0-11.5) and 23.0 (95% CI, 0.8-27.7) with ceritinib (log-rank 0.44, p = 0.5), and 21.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to not reached, NR) and 5.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to NR) with alectinib (log-rank 0.53, p = 0.5) in groups A and B, respectively. The median OS (months) comprised 29.8 (95% CI, 21.0 to NR) and 25.1 (95% CI, 10.8-53.6) in groups A and B, respectively (log-rank 0.57, p = 0.4). Age affected neither PFS nor OS. 19 and 37%, 50 and 40%, and 0 and 0% of patients in groups A and B, treated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib, respectively, developed high-grade adverse events. The treatment discontinuation rate was 9 and 21%, 16 and 60%, 0 and 0% with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib in groups A and B, respectively.. In the elderly, crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib treatments are associated with similar efficacy but different safety profiles; alectinib is associated with a lower rate of high-grade adverse events and a lower treatment discontinuation rate.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones; Young Adult

The mechanisms underlying anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) resistance have not been well investigated in clinical practice. We herein report the case of a lung cancer patient with carcinomatous meningitis who had an ALK I1171T resistance mutation revealed by direct DNA sequencing of the cerebrospinal fluid after treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy, crizotinib, and alectinib. I1171T is considered to be sensitive to ceritinib. Although ceritinib was not effective initially, we chose ceritinib again after whole-brain radiotherapy and ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Although the response duration was short, spinal magnetic resonance imaging revealed a marked response. The identification of an acquired ALK resistance mutation will aid in choosing the optimum sequence therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Meningeal Carcinomatosis; Mutation; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Sulfones

The current study was carried out to compare the effectiveness and safety of different ALK inhibitors in treating ALK+ NSCLC.. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), and intracranial ORR and DCR have been aggregated to appraise the effectiveness of each ALKi. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs) was pooled to evaluate their safety. Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to compare the ORR, DCR, PFS, and discontinuation rate of patients treated with alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy.. Compared with chemotherapy, ALK inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): alectinib, 0.50 (0.43-0.58); ceritinib, 0.75 (0.69-0.83); crizotinib, 0.71 (0.66-0.76)]. The ORRs were significantly higher for ALK inhibitors than for chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI: alectinib, 11.69 (4.29-36.56); ceritinib, 7.85 (3.44-19.27); crizotinib, 6.04 (3.33-11.71)]. The discontinuation rates were lower for ALK inhibitors than for chemotherapy [OR and corresponding 95% CI: alectinib, 0.42 (0.12-1.36); ceritinib, 0.52 (0.20-1.35); crizotinib, 0.70 (0.30-1.62)].. ALK+ NSCLC patients treated with ALKi tend to have longer PFS than those treated with chemotherapy. ALKi-naïve patients tended to response better than their ALKi-pretreated counterparts. Alectinib appeared to be preferable for treating brain metastases due to its high intracranial efficacy. Patients treated with alectinib or ceritinib tended to have higher ORR and DCR than patients with similar baselines treated with crizotinib or chemotherapy. No significant differences in discontinuation rate were found for alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Bayes Theorem; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Cell Line, Tumor; Crizotinib; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; ERG1 Potassium Channel; Humans; Kinetics; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Rats; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Signal Transduction; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfones

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogenes occur in approximately 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Various ALK inhibitors are in clinical use for the treatment of ALK-NSCLC, including the first generation ALK inhibitor, crizotinib, and recently the more highly potent alectinib and ceritinib. However, most tumors eventually become resistant to ALK specific inhibitors. To address the mechanisms underlying the development of ALK inhibitor resistance, we used iTRAQ quantitative mass spectrometry and phosphor-receptor tyrosine kinase arrays to investigate intracellular signaling alterations in ALK inhibitor resistant NSCLC cell lines. Src signaling was identified as an alectinib resistance mechanism, and combination treatment with ALK and Src inhibitors was highly effective for inhibiting the growth of ALK inhibitor resistant cells in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. Furthermore, phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase activation and downstream PI3K/AKT signaling was effectively blocked by inhibiting Src in alectinib resistant cells. Finally, we showed that the combined use of ALK and Src inhibitors inhibited the growth of other ALK-NSCLC cell lines, including those that were ceritinib or lorlatinib resistant. Our data suggest that targeting Src signaling may be an effective approach to the treatment of ALK-NSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Mice; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Signal Transduction; src-Family Kinases; Sulfones; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Several second-generation inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) have demonstrated potent activity in ALK rearrangement-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two of these agents, ceritinib, and alectinib, recently received approval for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC in Japan. The efficacy of treatment with a second-generation ALK inhibitor after failure with a different second-generation ALK inhibitor remains unclear. We present a series of eight patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with alectinib who experienced disease progression after ceritinib. Both crizotinib and ceritinib were administered to six patients, with four (29%) patients receiving crizotinib followed by ceritinib. Among the eight study patients, two (25%) had partial response, one (12%) stable disease, and five (63%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval=0-7.1 months). The results of this study suggest that the second-generation ALK inhibitor alectinib has limited efficacy after initial treatment with the second-generation ALK inhibitor ceritinib.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones; Survival Analysis; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibition using crizotinib has become the standard of care in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the treatment outcomes and duration of response vary widely. Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK is the most common translocation, and the fusion variants show different sensitivity to crizotinib in vitro. However, there are only limited data on the specific EML4-ALK variants and clinical responses of patients to various ALK inhibitors.. By multiplex reverse-transcriptase PCR, which detects 12 variants of known EML4-ALK rearrangements, we retrospectively determined ALK fusion variants in 54 advanced ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLCs. We subdivided the patients into two groups (variants 1/2/others and variants 3a/b) by protein stability and evaluated correlations of the variant status with clinical responses to crizotinib, alectinib, or ceritinib. Moreover, we established the EML4-ALK variant-expressing system and analyzed patterns of sensitivity of the variants to ALK inhibitors.. Of the 54 tumors analyzed, EML4-ALK variants 3a/b (44.4%) was the most common type, followed by variants 1 (33.3%) and 2 (11.1%). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 76.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 56.8-100] in group EML4-ALK variants 1/2/others versus 26.4% (95% CI 10.5-66.6) in group variants 3a/b (P = 0.034) among crizotinib-treated patients. Meanwhile, the 2-year PFS rate was 69.0% (95% CI 49.9-95.4) in group variants 1/2/others versus 32.7% (95% CI 15.6-68.4) in group variants 3a/b (P = 0.108) among all crizotinib-, alectinib-, and ceritinib-treated patients. Variant 3a- or 5a-harboring cells were resistant to ALK inhibitors with >10-fold higher half maximal inhibitory concentration in vitro.. Our findings show that group EML4-ALK variants 3a/b may be a major source of ALK inhibitor resistance in the clinic. The variant-specific genotype of the EML4-ALK fusion allows for more precise stratification of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Genotype; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Stability; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfones

We performed a multi-institutional study to identify prognostic factors and determine outcomes for patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis.. A total of 90 patients with brain metastases from ALK-rearranged NSCLC were identified from six institutions; 84 of 90 patients received radiotherapy to the brain (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] or whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]), and 86 of 90 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Estimates for overall (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival were determined and clinical prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards modeling.. Median OS after development of brain metastases was 49.5 months (95% CI, 29.0 months to not reached), and median intracranial progression-free survival was 11.9 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 18.2 months). Forty-five percent of patients with follow-up had progressive brain metastases at death, and repeated interventions for brain metastases were common. Absence of extracranial metastases, Karnofsky performance score ≥ 90, and no history of TKIs before development of brain metastases were associated with improved survival (P = .003, < .001, and < .001, respectively), whereas a single brain metastasis or initial treatment with SRS versus WBRT were not (P = .633 and .666, respectively). Prognostic factors significant by multivariable analysis were used to describe four patient groups with 2-year OS estimates of 33%, 59%, 76%, and 100%, respectively (P < .001).. Patients with brain metastases from ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with radiotherapy (SRS and/or WBRT) and TKIs have prolonged survival, suggesting that interventions to control intracranial disease are critical. The refinement of prognosis for this molecular subtype of NSCLC identifies a population of patients likely to benefit from first-line SRS, close CNS observation, and treatment of emergent CNS disease.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cranial Irradiation; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Karnofsky Performance Status; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Piperidines; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Radiosurgery; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Smoking; Sulfones

Crizotinib is the first anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor to have been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an ALK fusion gene, but it has been found that, in the clinic, patients develop resistance to it. Alectinib and ceritinib are second-generation ALK inhibitors which show remarkable clinical responses in both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-resistant NSCLC patients harboring an ALK fusion gene. Despite their impressive activity, clinical resistance to alectinib and ceritinib has also emerged. In the current study, we elucidated the resistance mechanisms to these second-generation ALK inhibitors in the H3122 NSCLC cell line harboring the EML4-ALK variant 1 fusion in vitro. Prolonged treatment of the parental H3122 cells with alectinib and ceritinib led to two cell lines which are 10 times less sensitive to alectinib and ceritinib than the parental H3122 cell line. Although mutations of ALK in its kinase domain are a common resistance mechanism for crizotinib, we did not detect any ALK mutation in these resistant cell lines. Rather, overexpression of phospho-ALK and alternative receptor tyrosine kinases such as phospho-EGFR, phospho-HER3, and phospho-IGFR-1R was observed in both resistant cell lines. Additionally, NRG1, a ligand for HER3, is upregulated and responsible for resistance by activating the EGFR family pathways through the NRG1-HER3-EGFR axis. Combination treatment with EGFR inhibitors, in particular afatinib, was shown to be effective at overcoming resistance. Our study provides new mechanistic insights into adaptive resistance to second-generation ALK inhibitors and suggests a potential clinical strategy to combat resistance to these second-generation ALK inhibitors in NSCLC.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; ErbB Receptors; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Receptors; Humans; Mutation; Neuregulin-1; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptor, ErbB-3; Signal Transduction; Sulfones

Topics: Adult; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Piperidines; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

The treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring chromosomal rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been revolutionized by the development of crizotinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of ALK, ROS1, and MET. However, resistance to crizotinib inevitably develops through a variety of mechanisms, leading to relapse both systemically and in the central nervous system (CNS). This has motivated the development of "second-generation" ALK inhibitors, including alectinib and ceritinib, that overcome some of the mutations leading to resistance. However, most of the reported ALK inhibitors do not show inhibition of the G1202R mutant, which is one of the most common mutations. Herein, we report the development of a structural analogue of alectinib (JH-VIII-157-02) that is potent against the G1202R mutant as well as a variety of other frequently observed mutants. In addition, JH-VIII-157-02 is capable of penetrating the CNS of mice following oral dosing.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Molecular Docking Simulation; Neuroblastoma; NIH 3T3 Cells; Piperidines; Point Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Acquired resistance mutations to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors such as crizotinib and alectinib have been documented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring ALK rearrangement (ALK+). Of note I1171T/N/S mutations in the ALK kinase domain have recently been described by several groups to confer resistance to alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor. Additionally one of these reports demonstrated one ALK+ NSCLC patient harboring an I1171T acquired mutation has responded to ceritinib, another second-generation ALK inhibitor.. We reported the presence of an ALK I1171N resistance mutation from comprehensive genomic profiling from a liver biopsy of a progressing metastatic lesion in an ALK+ patient on alectinib after an initial partial response. The patient then responded to ceritinib 750 mg orally once daily but required dose reduction to 600 mg once daily. She initially had grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes from crizotinib necessitating the original switch to alectinib but experienced no transaminase elevations with alectinib or ceritinib.. This is the fifth patient case to date demonstrating that ALK I1171 mutation confers resistance to alectinib and the second reported case of ALK I1171 mutation being sensitivity to ceritinib. Substitutions of isoleucine at amino acid 1171 in the ALK kinase domain may distinguish which second generation ALK inhibitor will be effective after crizotinib failure. This case also provides evidence that transaminase elevations is likely a unique adverse event associated with crizotinib and unlikely a "class" effect involving all ALK inhibitors.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones

Ceritinib and other second-generation inhibitors have demonstrated promising anticancer activity in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specifically, they can overcome resistance due to certain gatekeeper mutations acquired following crizotinib exposure. These agents now provide new options for the management of ALK-positive NSCLC.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sulfones