cefiderocol and avibactam

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Aztreonam; Boronic Acids; Carbapenems; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Meropenem; Tazobactam

The 68-year-old patient presented with fever, general malaise and physical weakness in neutropenia during a known relapse of acute myeloid leukaemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.. Due to immune suppression, an empiric antibiotic therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam was started. The 4MRGN screening was positive. For this reason, therapy was switched empirically to ceftazidime/avibactam plus colistin. A tongue ulcer with abscess formation and phlegmonous soft tissue reaction was revealed as the focus of the infection. Several microbiological probes including a blood culture discovered. Die Vorstellung der 68-jährigen Patientin erfolgte bei hohem Fieber, allgemeinem Unwohlseisn und körperlicher Schwäche in der Neutropenie bei Rezidiv einer akuten myeloischen Leukämie nach allogener Stammzelltransplantation.. Aufgrund der bestehenden Immundefizienz wurde eine kalkulierte antibiotische Therapie mit Piperacillin/Tazobactam begonnen. Bei positivem 4MRGN-Screening wurde diese kalkuliert auf Colistin und Ceftazidim/Avibactam umgestellt. Diagnostiziert wurde ein Zungenulkus mit Abszessbildung und phlegmonöser Weichteilreaktion. In mehreren mikrobiologischen Proben, inklusive einer Blutkultur, gelang der Nachweis eines. Vierfach multiresistente gramnegative Bakterien (4MRGN) sind aufgrund ihrer Resistenz gegenüber 4 bakterizid wirkenden Hauptantibiotikagruppen (Acylureidopenicilline, Cephalosporine der 3. Generation, Carbapeneme, Fluorchinolone) nur schwer therapierbar. Der vorliegende Fall zeigt für Cefiderocol eine gute klinische Wirksamkeit – auch bei Erregern, die gegen Antibiotika wie Colistin und Ceftazidim/Avibactam resistent sind und er verdeutlicht, wie wichtig eine antibiogrammgerechte Therapie ist.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Colistin; Communicable Diseases; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neutropenia

Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model.. In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking.. Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy.. Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Ampicillin; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Sulbactam

In this study, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary trajectory of a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) population during β-lactam antibiotic therapy. Five KPC-Kp isolates were collected from a single patient. Whole-genome sequencing and a comparative genomics analysis were performed on the isolates and all

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Klebsiella; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxalactam

Ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol are two of the latest antibiotics with activity against a wide variety of Gram-negatives, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. We sought to describe the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ceftazidime/avibactam- and cefiderocol-resistant KPC-Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) detected during an outbreak in 2020 in the medical ICU of our hospital.. We collected 11 KPC-Kp isolates (6 clinical; 5 surveillance samples) resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol from four ICU patients (November 2020 to January 2021), without prior exposure to these agents. All patients had a decontamination regimen as part of the standard ICU infection prevention protocol. Additionally, one ceftazidime/avibactam- and cefiderocol-resistant KPC-Kp (June 2019) was retrospectively recovered. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. β-Lactamases were characterized and confirmed. WGS was also performed.. All KPC-Kp isolates (ceftazidime/avibactam MIC  ≥16/4 mg/L; cefiderocol MIC ≥4 mg/L) were KPC + CTX-M-15 producers and belonged to the ST307 high-risk-clone (ST307-HRC). KPC-62 (L168Q) was detected in all isolates involved in the 2020 outbreak, contained in January 2021. KPC-31 (D179Y) was identified in the KPC-Kp from 2019. Cloning experiments demonstrated that both blaKPC-62 and blaKPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime/avibactam resistance (MIC >16 mg/L) and an increased cefiderocol MIC. Additionally, mutations in OmpA and EnvZ/OmpR porin proteins (in KPC-62-Kp) and in PBP2 (in KPC-31-Kp) were found and may be involved in cefiderocol resistance.. The emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol in KPC-Kp-HRCs, together with the diversification of novel KPC enzymes displaying different antibiotic resistance phenotypes, is an epidemiological and clinical risk.

Topics: Bacterial Proteins; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Hospitals, University; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Retrospective Studies; Spain

Klebsiella pneumoniae AR 0047 from the CDC and FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank is resistant to cefiderocol, a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin. Genomics analysis and genetic complementation revealed that a frameshift mutation in

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Cephalosporins; Escherichia coli; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Porins

To characterize a carbapenem-resistant Citrobacter freundii (Cf-Emp) co-producing class A, B and D carbapenemases, resistant to novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) and cefiderocol.. Carbapenemase production was tested by an immunochromatography assay. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed by broth microdilution. WGS was performed using short- and long-read sequencing. Transfer of carbapenemase-encoding plasmids was assessed by conjugation experiments.. Cf-Emp was isolated on selective medium for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales from the surveillance rectal swab taken at hospital admission from a patient of Moroccan origin. Cf-Emp produced three different carbapenemases, including KPC-2, OXA-181 and VIM-1, and was resistant to all β-lactams including carbapenems, novel BLICs (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam) and cefiderocol. MIC of aztreonam/avibactam was 0.25 mg/L. The strain belonged to ST22, one of the C. freundii lineages of global diffusion, known to be associated with carbapenemase production. Each carbapenemase gene was located aboard a different plasmid (named pCf-KPC, pCf-OXA and pCf-VIM, respectively), which also carried other clinically relevant resistance genes, such as armA (pCf-KPC), blaSHV-12 (pCf-VIM) and qnrS1 (pCf-OXA). Transferability to Escherichia coli J53 by conjugation was observed for all plasmids.. The finding of enterobacterial strains carrying multiple carbapenemase genes on transferable plasmids is alarming, because similar strains could provide an important reservoir for disseminating these clinically relevant resistance determinants.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Cefiderocol; Citrobacter freundii; Drug Combinations; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Plasmids

We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem combination against Guiana-extended spectrum (GES)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.. Eighteen P. aeruginosa isolates producing GES-1 (n = 5), GES-5 (n = 5) or miscellaneous GESs (combinations of GES-19, GES-20 and/or GES-26; n = 8) were evaluated. In vitro MIC testing was determined using broth microdilution. In a validated murine thigh infection model, HSRs of cefiderocol 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g q8h as a 2 h IV infusion, meropenem 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion or ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem were administered. Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline and the proportion of isolates in each genotypic group meeting 1-log10 kill endpoint were assessed.. Modal MICs (mg/L) ranged from 0.125 to 1 for cefiderocol, 4 to >64 for ceftazidime/avibactam and 2 to >64 for meropenem. Cefiderocol produced >1-log10 of kill against all 18 tested isolates. Meropenem was active against all GES-1 isolates whereas activity against GES-5 and miscellaneous GESs was lacking, consistent with the MICs. Ceftazidime/avibactam was active against all GES-1 and GES-5 isolates and retained activity against 62.5% of miscellaneous GESs including isolates with elevated MICs. For isolates where ceftazidime/avibactam failed, the addition of meropenem restored the in vivo efficacy.. As monotherapy, cefiderocol was active in vivo against all tested isolates. The activities of meropenem or ceftazidime/avibactam alone were variable; however, a combination of both was active against all isolates. Cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem could be valuable therapeutic options for GES-producing P. aeruginosa infections. Clinical confirmatory data are warranted.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In February 2022, a critically ill patient colonized with a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae producing KPC-3 and VIM-1 carbapenemases was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 in the intensive care unit of Policlinico Umberto I hospital in Rome, Italy. During 95 days of hospitalization, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and cefiderocol were administered consecutively to treat 3 respiratory tract infections sustained by different bacterial agents. Those therapies altered the resistome of K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 colonizing or infecting the patient during the hospitalization period. In vivo evolution of the K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 resistome occurred through plasmid loss, outer membrane porin alteration, and a nonsense mutation in the cirA siderophore gene, resulting in high levels of cefiderocol resistance. Cross-selection can occur between K. pneumoniae and treatments prescribed for other infective agents. K. pneumoniae can stably colonize a patient, and antimicrobial-selective pressure can promote progressive K. pneumoniae resistome evolution, indicating a substantial public health threat.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Humans; Italy; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore-cephalosporin, which usually penetrates the bacteria through the iron-uptake pathways. Data is limited on the factors affecting CFDC activity and methods for overcoming resistance development. Synergistic approaches are needed to tackle antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to determine CFDC activity on Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patients attending a single hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), to explore the effect of β-lactamases on CFDC activity and to enhance CFDC susceptibility in both iron-depleted and iron-enriched conditions.. We investigated 238 K. pneumoniae strains from diverse clinical sources. β-lactamase genes were detected by PCR. Susceptibility to CFDC and 12 comparator antibiotics were tested. Combinations of CFDC with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) and/or an outer membrane (OM) permeabilizer (polymyxin B nonapeptide) were tested in iron-depleted and iron-enriched conditions.. CFDC was deemed effective against MDR and XDR K. pneumoniae. Synergistic combination of CFDC with BLIs and OM permeabilizers could be effective to treat infections in iron-rich sites, but this should be investigated in vivo.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Cephalosporins; Hospitals; Humans; Inpatients; Iron; Kinetics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Monobactams; Siderophores; United Arab Emirates

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a public health concern. The limited antimicrobial options against CPE have led to the development of novel antimicrobial molecules. In the present study, we characterized the genetic determinants associated with the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem/vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem/relebactam (IMI-REL) and cefiderocol (CFD) in a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain isolated from a critically ill patient.. Genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina iSeq 100 and Minion Oxford Nanopore platforms. Assemblies were performed with a de novo approach using short-read, hybrid and long-lead assembly approaches. Final assembly was manually curated and carefully verified. Circular elements were screened for antimicrobial-resistance genes, porins, virulence factors and prophage regions.. KPC-Kp (KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae) BO743 was resistant to all novel β-lactams including CAZ-AVI, MER-VAB, IMI-REL and CFD. The genome of strain BO743 is composed of a single chromosome of 5 347 606 bp and three circular plasmids of 363 634 bp (pBO743-363Kb), 120 290 bp (pBO743-120Kb) and 54 339 bp (pBO743-54Kb). Sequence analysis demonstrated that KPC-Kp BO743 co-harboured bla. The description of the genome of KPC-Kp cross-resistant to novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol reveals the presence of numerous antimicrobial resistance genes including bla

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Boronic Acids; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Critical Illness; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

To evaluate the activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against a clinical and laboratory collection of ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa β-lactamase mutants.. The activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam and comparators was evaluated against a collection of 30 molecularly characterized ceftolozane/tazobactam- and/or ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from patients previously treated with cephalosporins. To evaluate how the different β-lactamases in the clinical isolates affected the resistance to these agents, a copy of each blaPDC, blaOXA-2 and blaOXA-10 ancestral and mutant allele from the clinical isolates was cloned in pUCp24 and expressed in dual blaPDC-oprD (for blaPDC-like genes) or single oprD (for blaOXA-2-like and blaOXA-10-like genes) PAO1 knockout mutants. MICs were determined using reference methodologies.. For all isolates, MICs were higher than 4 and/or 8 mg/L for ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, respectively. Cefiderocol was the most active agent, showing activity against all isolates, except one clinical isolate that carried an R504C substitution in PBP3 (MIC = 16 mg/L). Imipenem/relebactam was highly active against all isolates, except two clinical isolates that carried the VIM-20 carbapenemase. Cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam displayed activity against most of the isolates, but resistance was observed in some strains with PBP3 amino acid substitutions or that overexpressed mexAB-oprM or mexXY efflux pumps. Evaluation of transformants revealed that OXA-2 and OXA-10 extended-spectrum variants cause a 2-fold increase in the MIC of cefiderocol relative to parental enzymes.. Cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam show promising and complementary in vitro activity against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa. These agents may represent potential therapeutic options for ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Borinic Acids; Carboxylic Acids; Cefepime; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Cyclooctanes; Humans; Imipenem; Piperidines; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Tazobactam

To evaluate the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam and zidebactam, against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates.. MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam/β-lactam inhibitor but also cefiderocol as comparator were determined for 64 and 39 clinical Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively, producing representative MBLs, i.e. derivatives of NDM (n = 64), VIM (n = 32), IMP (n = 8) and SPM (n = 2). MICs were also determined for Escherichia coli TOP10 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring recombinant plasmids producing the different β-lactamases under isogenic backgrounds (n = 22 and n = 11, respectively). Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations were additionally determined for the abovementioned β-lactamase inhibitors using β-lactamase crude extracts.. The susceptibility rate for aztreonam was 17.1% among MBL-producing Enterobacterales, while it was very high with aztreonam/zidebactam (98.4%), and to a lower extent with aztreonam/nacubactam (84.4%) and aztreonam/taniborbactam (75%), compared with aztreonam/avibactam (70.3%) and cefiderocol (39.1%). Among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates, the susceptibility rates were 53.8% with aztreonam, 66.7% with aztreonam/nacubactam and aztreonam/taniborbactam combinations, and 69.2% with aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/zidebactam and cefiderocol.. Altogether, these results showed that combinations including aztreonam and novel β-lactamase inhibitors, such as zidebactam, nacubactam or taniborbactam, have a very significant in vitro activity against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates, the aztreonam/zidebactam combination being the best option. On the other hand, aztreonam/zidebactam is equivalent to aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Aztreonam; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that displays activity against Gram-negative bacteria. To establish cefiderocol susceptibility levels of Acinetobacter baumannii strains from China, we performed susceptibility testing and genomic analyses on 131 clinical isolates. Cefiderocol shows high activity against the strains. The production of PER-1 is the key mechanism of cefiderocol resistance.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefiderocol; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Microbial Sensitivity Tests