carubicin and amrubicin

Idarubicin showed the superior activity against Acute Non-Lymphocytic Leukemia (ANLL) in the prospective randomized trials comparing to daunorubicin and it is judged that the analog will become the first choice in the treatment on ANLL. Anthracyclines including SM-5887, KRN-8602, ME-2303 under studies in Japan have shown comparable or superior antitumor activities and lower cardiac toxicities compared to doxorubicin in preclinical studies and therefore the results obtained in clinical trials are expected. Phase II trials of anthrapyrazoles which is an analog of mitoxantrone are in progress. Among three compounds entered it is of note that CI-941 has demonstrated an excellent activity against advanced breast cancer.

Topics: Animals; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carubicin; Doxorubicin; Humans; Idarubicin; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Menogaril; Stomach Neoplasms

Idarubicin showed the superior activity against Acute Non-Lymphocytic Leukemia (ANLL) in the prospective randomized trials comparing to daunorubicin and it is judged that the analog will become the first choice in the treatment on ANLL. Anthracyclines including SM-5887, KRN-8602, ME-2303 under studies in Japan have shown comparable or superior antitumor activities and lower cardiac toxicities compared to doxorubicin in preclinical studies and therefore the results obtained in clinical trials are expected. Phase II trials of anthrapyrazoles which is an analog of mitoxantrone are in progress. Among three compounds entered it is of note that CI-941 has demonstrated an excellent activity against advanced breast cancer.

Topics: Animals; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carubicin; Doxorubicin; Humans; Idarubicin; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Menogaril; Stomach Neoplasms

In an attempt to predict the clinical activity of newly developed anthracycline analogues, ME2303, KRN8602, and SM5887 in the treatment of lung cancer, we compared antitumor activity of these drugs with that of adriamycin, using six human lung cancer cell lines and two drug-resistant human lung cancer sublines. Taking the pharmacokinetic data into consideration, we evaluated the relative antitumor activity: the ratio of area under the concentration-time curve of each drug to the 50% inhibitory concentration of the drug. Regarding this ratio, ME2303 was more potent than adriamycin, SM5887, and KRN8602. Cross-resistance of the new analogues to adriamycin was investigated using an adriamycin-resistant small cell lung cancer subline, SBC-3/ADM100 and an etoposide-resistant subline, SBC-3/ETP. SBC-3/ADM100 being 106-fold more resistant to adriamycin than the parent SBC-3 showed less resistance to the analogues: 1.80-fold to KRN8602, 3.80-fold to SM5887, and 8.60-fold to ME2303. SBC-3/ETP which was 52.1-fold more resistant to etoposide and 39.5-fold more resistant to adriamycin were also less resistant to the new analogues: 3.27-fold to KRN8602, 9.07-fold to SM5887, and 17.3-fold to ME2303. In conclusion, ME2303 was found to be the most potent agent among drugs tested for the treatment of lung cancer, and KRN8602 can be expected to be beneficial for the treatment of drug-resistant small cell lung cancer.

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Carubicin; Doxorubicin; Drug Resistance; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Structure; Tumor Cells, Cultured

A new model to predict antitumor activity of new analogues was developed, and the cross-resistance against cisplatin (CDDP) and Adriamycin (ADM) was examined. A preclinical evaluation of various new analogues using this new model was performed. The antitumor activities of KT6149, MX-2 (KRN8602), SM5887, menogaril (TUT-7), and liblomycin (NK313) were evaluated against four non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, PC-7, -9, -13, and -14; two small cell lung cancer cell lines, H69 and N231; four CDDP-resistant cell lines, PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, and H69/0.4; a human myelogenous leukemia cell line, K562; and its ADM-resistant subline, K562/ADM by clonogenic assay. The relative antitumor activities of these new analogues were compared with those of parental agents, mitomycin C, ADM, bleomycin, and several anticancer drugs, CDDP, daunomycin, vindesine, and etoposide. KT6149 was more active than mitomycin C against all lung cancer cell lines and the human myelogenous leukemia cell line. Menogaril showed greater activity than ADM, and MX-2 showed activity similar to ADM. However, the antitumor activity of SM5887 was lower than that of ADM. SM5887 and menogaril showed cross-resistance to K562/ADM. Nevertheless, the antitumor activity against K562/ADM of MX-2 was similar to that of the parental cell lines. The activity of liblomycin was similar to that of bleomycin. Thus, KT6149 appears to be the best analogue for use in a clinical trial against lung cancer. MX-2 was active even against ADM-resistant cancer cells. The values of relative resistance to CDDP or ADM were 4.7, 8.1, 7.5, 20.0, and 13.6 for PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, H69/0.4, and K562/ADM, respectively. CDDP-resistant cell lines showed no cross-resistance with other drugs in this study. K562/ADM showed cross-resistance against daunomycin, etoposide, and vindesine. In contrast, mitomycin C and bleomycin had nearly equal activity against K562 and K562/ADM. However, K562/ADM was 2.4-fold more sensitive to CDDP than its parental cell line, K562 (P less than 0.001). These results suggested that the mechanism of CDDP resistance is different from that of multidrug resistance.

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Bleomycin; Carubicin; Cisplatin; Daunorubicin; Doxorubicin; Drug Resistance; Humans; Menogaril; Mitomycins; Nogalamycin; Tumor Cells, Cultured