captax and hexyl-cinnamic-aldehyde

captax has been researched along with hexyl-cinnamic-aldehyde* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for captax and hexyl-cinnamic-aldehyde

ArticleYear
Development of a chromophore-solid phase peptide reaction assay (C-SPRA) for assessing skin sensitization in vitro.
    The Analyst, 2020, May-07, Volume: 145, Issue:9

    We developed an in vitro chromophore-solid phase peptide reaction assay (C-SPRA) using microbead-immobilized peptides and chromophores. Peptide-resins (microbeads) reacted with 14 representative chemicals to demonstrate the test's capacity to predict skin sensitization. C-SPRA enables accurate and high-throughput assessments of various chemicals, including poorly water-soluble sensitizers that are regarded as weakly potent by other methods.

    Topics: Acrolein; Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Benzothiazoles; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromatography, Reverse-Phase; Coloring Agents; Cysteine; Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate; Immobilized Proteins; Lysine; Microspheres; Peptides; Skin; Sulfhydryl Compounds

2020
Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays.
    Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 1993, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    The guinea pig maximization test and the Buehler occluded patch test are used widely to identify the sensitization potential of new chemicals. This information enables toxicologists and/or regulatory authorities to determine whether a chemical should be classified formally as a skin sensitizer. Both to improve and to harmonize these assessments internationally, the OECD has recommended recently that moderate rather than strong contact sensitizers are used as positive control substances. The purpose is to ensure an adequate level of sensitivity in sensitization assays performed at specific testing establishments. Results from two laboratories reported here show that the minimum acceptable standard laid down by the OECD can be achieved and indeed commonly exceeded by a substantial margin. Furthermore, results with these positive controls in a new method, the local lymph node assay, also appear to satisfy similar criteria, suggesting results from this assay, including negative data, should be acceptable for classification purposes. However, a review of the way in which results with new chemicals will be interpreted for regulatory purposes, in the context of positive control data, reveals that considerable inadequacies still exist. It is recommended that ultimately, sensitization data can only be interpreted meaningfully (i.e. to protect humans from sensitization hazards) by considering the potency of the contact allergen in the context of the sensitivity of the assay performed at the particular testing institution.

    Topics: Acrolein; Animals; Benzocaine; Benzothiazoles; Dermatitis, Contact; Guinea Pigs; Lymph Nodes; Mice; Mice, Inbred CBA; Skin Tests; Thiazoles

1993