calyculin-a and motuporin

The interactions of the okadaic acid class of compounds, with special emphasis on the solution structures of calyculin A and dephosphonocalyculin A with PP1 are reported. After examination of the interactions of all docked structures, a receptor based pharmacophore model for the interactions of the protein phosphatase inhibitors has been developed. Calyculin A or dephosphonocalyculin A can interact with the enzyme in either a manner similar to the reported crystal structure, or in an extended form. The inhibitors require two essential regions interacting with the hydrophobic region and the central metal binding regions of the enzyme. This simplified model is consistent with previously published models of the okadaic acid class of compounds with PP1.

Topics: Crystallography, X-Ray; Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32; Enzyme Inhibitors; Hydrogen Bonding; Marine Toxins; Microcystins; Models, Molecular; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Okadaic Acid; Oxazoles; Peptides, Cyclic; Phosphoprotein Phosphatases; Phosphoproteins; Protein Binding

The hepatotoxic cyclic heptapeptide microcystins and cyclic pentapeptide nodularins are powerful liver tumor promoters and potent inhibitors of the catalytic subunits of protein phosphatase-1 and -2A (PP-1c and PP-2Ac). In marked contrast to microcystins, which interact covalently with PP-1 and PP-2A, the nodularins do not bind covalently to PP-1 and PP-2A and may additionally possess unique carcinogenic properties. The conformation of microcystin-LR has been determined in solution and bound to PP-1c. We show here that the free NMR solution structures of two distinct microcystin structural congeners (microcystin-LR and -LL) are remarkably similar to the bound crystal structure of microcystin-LR. We have exploited this finding by using Metropolis Monte Carlo modeling to dock the solution structures of microcystin-LL and the marine toxin motuporin (nodularin-V) onto the crystal structure of PP-1c. Both of these toxins occupy a position similar to that of microcystin-LR when bound to PP-1c. However, although there are relatively minor differences in the structural orientation of microcystin-LL compared with microcystin-LR, there is a striking difference in the position of the N-methyldehydrobutyrine residue in motuporin relative to the comparable N-methyldehydroalanine residue in microcystin-LR. We propose that this difference in orientation provides a molecular explanation for why nodularins are incapable of forming a covalent linkage with PP-1c. Furthermore, the predicted position of N-methyldehydrobutyrine in motuporin is at the surface of the PP-1c-toxin complex, which may thus facilitate chemical interaction with a further macromolecule(s) possibly relating to its carcinogenic properties. PP-1c and PP-2Ac are also targets for other marine toxins such as okadaic acid and calyculin A. It was therefore of interest to use Metropolis Monte Carlo modeling to dock the known free crystal structures of okadaic acid and calyculin A to the crystal structure of PP-1c. These experiments predict that both okadaic acid and calyculin A are strikingly similar to microcystins and motuporin in their tertiary structure and relative PP-1c binding position.

Topics: Animals; Marine Toxins; Microcystins; Models, Molecular; Monte Carlo Method; Okadaic Acid; Oxazoles; Peptides, Cyclic; Phosphoprotein Phosphatases; Protein Phosphatase 1; Toxins, Biological