c-peptide and glimepiride

Reported rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lower with glimepiride as compared to glyburide. The aim of this study was to determine whether physiologic differences in counterregulatory neuroendocrine and metabolic mechanisms during hypoglycemia provide a basis for the observed clinical differences between glimepiride and glyburide.. Non-diabetic volunteers (age 38±2years, BMI 26±1kg/m(2)) were studied in a single-blind fashion during separate 2day randomized protocols consisting of 2h hyperinsulinemic (9pmol/kg/min) euglycemic (4.9±0.1mmol) and hypoglycemic (2.9±0.1mmol/L) clamps. Individuals received biologically equivalent doses of glimepiride (4mg) or glyburide (10mg) 1h prior to each glucose clamp (n=11) as well as a control group of placebo studies. Glucose kinetics were calculated using D-Glucose-6-6d2.. Insulin and C-peptide levels were increased (p<0.05) during euglycemia in both sulfonylurea groups as compared to placebo. However, despite equivalent hypoglycemia, insulin and C-peptide levels were higher (p<0.05) only after glyburide. Glucagon responses and endogenous glucose production (EGP) were decreased (p<0.05) during hypoglycemia following glyburide administration as compared to glimepiride. Glyburide reduced (p<0.05) norepinephrine responses during euglycemic clamps. In addition combined epinephrine and norepinephrine responses during hypoglycemia were reduced (p<0.05) following glyburide as compared to placebo. Leptin levels fell by a greater amount (p<0.05) during hypoglycemia with both sulfonylureas as compared to placebo.. In summary, glimepiride and glyburide can both similarly increase insulin and C-peptide levels during hyperinsulinemic euglycemia. However, during moderate hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.9mmol/L) glyburide resulted in increased C-peptide and insulin, but blunted glucagon, sympathetic nervous system and EGP responses. We conclude that glyburide can acutely reduce key neuroendocrine and metabolic counterregulatory defenses during hypoglycemia in healthy individuals.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Leptin; Male; Pancreatic Polypeptide; Single-Blind Method; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Topics: Adult; Aged; Autoimmunity; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Purines; Quinazolines; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The aim of present study is to assess whether if basal insulin, glargine, could improve insulin secretory function of β-cells compared with glimepiride when metformin alone was failed. This was an open-label and multi-center study for 52 weeks in Korean patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes by metformin monotherapy. Subjects were randomized to glargine or glimepiride groups (n = 38 vs. 36, respectively). The primary endpoint was to compare changes in c-peptide via glucagon test after 48 weeks. Glycemic efficacy and safety endpoints (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), HOMA-B, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid profiles, and hypoglycemic events) were also checked. The mean disease duration of all subjects was 88.2 months. Changes in C-peptide was no significant different between groups (P = 0.73), even though insulin secretion was not worsened in both groups at the endpoint. Glargine was not superior to glimepiride in other β-cell function indexes such as HOMA-B (P = 0.28). HbA1c and FPG reduced significantly in each groups but not different between two groups. Although, severe hypoglycemia did not occur, symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in glimepiride group (P = 0.01). Insulin glargine was as effective as glimepiride in controlling hyperglycemia and maintaining β-cell function in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes during 48 weeks study period, after failure of metformin monotherapy. Hypoglycemic profile was favorable in the insulin glargine group and less weight gain was observed in the glimepiride group. Our results suggest that glargine and glimepiride can be considered after failure of metformin monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Chi-Square Distribution; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Young Adult

After approval of sitagliptin and >750 mg of metformin in Japan, a triple oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) regimen including sulfonylurea, metformin, and sitagliptin was sometimes described. However, in the real world of clinical practice, the daily dose of sulfonylurea tended to be decreased according to the warning from the Japan Diabetes Society for avoiding hypoglycemia, instead of increasing the dose of metformin for maintaining hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels with this regimen. This study examined the impact of either a small dose of glimepiride or a high dose of metformin on HbA1c in triple OAD therapy with sitagliptin in a 3-month, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study.. Fifty-six type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who had been treated with 50 mg of sitagliptin, ≥ 1,000 mg of metformin, and ≤ 1 mg of glimepiride with an HbA1c level of <7.4% during at least 3 months were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups who either received a 50% reduced dose of metformin (n = 27) or discontinued glimepiride (n = 29), while sitagliptin administration continued in both groups. Twenty-six patients from the reduced metformin group and 27 patients from the discontinued glimepiride group completed the study.. Significantly greater changes were observed in HbA1c and glycated albumin levels in patients who discontinued glimepiride than in patients with a 50% reduced metformin dose, during the 2-3-month period than in the 1-3-month period.. Glimepiride is important for good glycemic control in triple OAD therapy with sitaglitpin and metformin. This regimen may be useful for those patients who do not achieve satisfactory glycemic control with dual combination therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

An elevated PI/I ratio is attributable to increased secretory demand on β-cells. However, the effect of postprandial targeting therapy on proinsulin level is unknown. We evaluated the metabolic effect of glinide and sulfonylurea (SU) using the meal tolerance test (MTT).. MTT was applied to previously untreated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Twenty-two participants were given a test meal (450 kcal). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured at 0 (fasting), 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Serum proinsulin and C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) were measured at 0 and 120 min. Postprandial profile was assessed at baseline and following 3 months treatment with either mitiglinide or glimepiride.. Plasma glucose level at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min was significantly improved by mitiglinide. Whereas, glimepiride showed a significant improve plasma glucose at 0, 180 min. Peak IRI shifted from 120 to 30 min by mitiglinide treatment. The pattern of insulin secretion was not changed by glimepiride treatment. Whereas mitiglinide did not affect the PI/I ratio, glimepiride tended to increase the PI/I ratio. Moreover, although mitiglinide did not affect PI/I ratio as a whole, marked reduction was noted in some patients treated by mitiglinide. PI/I ratio was reduced significantly in the responder group. The responder subgroup exhibited less insulin resistance and higher insulinogenic index at baseline than non-responders. Moreover, the triglyceride level of responders was significantly lower than that of non-responders.. Mitiglinide improved postprandial insulin secretion pattern and thereby suppressed postprandial glucose spike. In T2DM patients with low insulin resistance and low triglyceride, mitiglinide recovered impaired β-cell function from the viewpoint of the PI/I ratio.. UMIN000010467.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Postprandial Period; Proinsulin; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triglycerides

To investigate the efficacy of continuing glimepiride in combination with basal-prandial insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.. An open crossover study was performed with arms of discontinuation and continuation of glimepiride in 25 subjects with mean diabetes duration of 17 years and 5 years of insulin treatment combined with glimepiride plus metformin. At entry and at the end of each 3-month arm, meal tolerance tests were performed for measurements of blood glucose and C-peptide.. In terms of between-treatment differences (discontinuation vs. continuation arm of glimepiride) during meal tolerance tests performed at the ends of arms, significant increases in plasma glucose were seen on the discontinuation arm at 0-, 30-, and 60-min, while significant decreases in serum C-peptide were observed at 60- and 120-min. A1C values of the discontinuation arm significantly increased (from 6.6 ± 0.6 at baseline to 7.7 ± 0.8 at 3-months, p<0.0001). Increases in A1C were closely correlated with decreases in area under the curve of meal-stimulated serum C-peptide (r=-0.61, p<0.0001).. Since endogenous insulin secretion is more physiological than subcutaneous insulin injection, continuing glimepiride may remain beneficial, partly through enhancing insulin secretion, in individuals with a long duration of diabetes and basal-prandial insulin therapy.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

We tested the hypotheses that in nondiabetic individuals, partial inhibition of insulin secretion with the ATP-sensitive K(+) channel agonist (opener) diazoxide, compared with placebo, results in higher plasma glucose and higher plasma glucagon concentrations after a mixed meal and after administration of the sulfonylurea glimepiride.. Plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon concentrations were measured every 30 min from -60 through 180 min with random-sequence, double-blind administration of diazoxide (6.0 mg/kg) or placebo at -30 and 1 min, ingestion of a formula mixed meal (Ensure Plus) at 0 min after diazoxide and after placebo and, on a separate occasion, ingestion of glimepiride (4.0 mg) at 0 min (with glucose infused to prevent hypoglycemia) after diazoxide and after placebo in 11 healthy young adults.. With diazoxide administration, insulin (P = 0.0016) and C-peptide (P = 0.0287) concentrations were decreased and glucose concentrations were increased (e.g., 180-min values of 106 ± 4 mg/dL [5.9 ± 0.2 mmol/L] compared with 87 ± 2 mg/dL [4.8 ± 0.1 mmol/L] with placebo; P < 0.0001), but glucagon concentrations were no different after the mixed meal. Similarly, with diazoxide, C-peptide concentrations were decreased (P = 0.0015) and glucose concentrations were increased (P < 0.0001), but glucagon concentrations declined similarly after glimepiride administration.. Partial inhibition of insulin secretion results in impairment of glucose tolerance after a mixed meal and after glimepiride administration in the absence of a difference in glucagon secretion. They underscore the primary glucoregulatory role of insulin and support the evidence that β-cell secretion is not the only regulator of α-cell glucagon secretion.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diazoxide; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; KATP Channels; Male; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Young Adult

To compare the efficacy of a fixed-dose triple oral diabetes polypill containing 1 or 2 mg glimepiride, 500 mg sustained-release metformin, and 15 mg pioglitazone (GMP) administered once daily with human insulin 70/30 mix and 500 mg sustained-release metformin administered twice daily (IM) in insulin-naÏve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over 8.0%] on a combination of glimepiride and metformin.. One hundred and one subjects were randomized to GMP or IM regimens for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c and secondary outcomes were changes in fasting plasma, and postprandial plasma glucoses and the number of patients achieving a drop in HbA1c of over 1%. Other secondary outcomes were changes in the lipid profile, C-peptide level, body weight as well as physician assessments of efficacy and patient assessment of tolerability.. The primary outcome of a change in HbA1c showed a trend towards a lower HbA1c with GMP therapy (-1.33% vs. -0.83%; p = 0.059). The number of subjects achieving a decrease in HbA1c of greater than 1.0% was significantly greater in the GMP therapy (72.5% vs. 22%; p = 0.0001). Both regimens equally and significantly reduced fasting and postprandial glucose levels (p = 0.05). Weight gain was nonsignificantly greater with IM (2.69 vs. 0.92 kg; p = 0.223). Investigator assessment of efficacy was significantly better with GMP (p = 0.001) as was tolerability as assessed by patients (p = 0.0001).. When compared with suboptimally titrated IM there was a trend towards a lower HbA1c with GMP and significantly more GMP subjects obtained an HbA1c under 7%. Global assessments by investigators and subjects showed both a greater efficacy and tolerability with GMP.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Pioglitazone; Postprandial Period; Prospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glimepiride plus insulin glargine in ethnic Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This 24-week, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in eight centers in Brazil. One hundred ethnic Japanese T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control [HbA(1c): 8.0-11.0% and fasting plasma glucose (FPG)>or=140 mg/dL] on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were enrolled. Patients were treated once daily with glimepiride 3mg (morning) and glargine (bedtime) with dose titration to achieve FPG 72-100mg/dL.. At Week 24, the mean dose of glargine was 37.6 IU/day. There were significant decreases (p<0.0001) compared with baseline, for mean HbA(1c) (1.5%), mean FPG (88.3mg/dL) (p<0.0001), mean PPG (112.0mg/dL), and mean fasting C-peptide (1.14 ng/mL). Peptide index (peak-basal/basal) in carbohydrate challenge test increased by 2.24 units. No severe adverse events, including severe hypoglycemia were reported.. Our study suggests that combined therapy of insulin glargine and glimepiride should be considered for T2DM patients who have unsatisfactory response to previous OAD treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of glimepiride between once- and twice-daily dosing in type 2 diabetic patients. Eight Japanese type 2 diabetic patients, who had been treated with 2 mg glimepiride alone over 4 weeks (age 40-70, body mass index

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride. The present studies were undertaken to test the hypothesis that a differential effect on glucagon secretion may be involved. We performed hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (approximately 2.5 mmol/L) clamps in 16 healthy volunteers who received in randomized order placebo, glyburide (10 mg), and glimepiride (4 mg) just before beginning the insulin infusion and measured plasma glucagon, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone levels during the clamp and during a 3-hour recovery period after discontinuation of the insulin infusion. Neither sulfonylurea altered glucagon responses or those of other counterregulatory hormones (except cortisol) during the clamp. However, glyburide delayed plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia (plasma glucose at end of recovery period: control, 4.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; glyburide, 3.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .0001; glimepiride, 4.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .08). Despite lower plasma glucose levels, glyburide stimulated insulin secretion during this period (0.89 +/- 0.13 vs 1.47 +/- 0.15 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), control vs glyburide; P = .001), whereas glimepiride did not (P = .08). Short-term administration of glyburide or glimepiride did not alter glucagon responses during hypoglycemia. In contrast, during recovery from hypoglycemia, glyburide but not glimepiride inappropriately stimulates insulin secretion at low plasma glucose levels. This differential effect on insulin secretion may be an important factor in explaining why glyburide causes severe hypoglycemia more frequently than glimepiride.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Epinephrine; Female; Glucose; Glyburide; Hormones; Human Growth Hormone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Kinetics; Male; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Supplementary insulin therapy provides assistance to meal-time insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and may have protective effects on beta-cell function.. This study explored the immediate effect of supplementary insulin therapy on beta- cell function in patients with glimepiride monotherapy (five women, 15 men; 61.8 +/- 6.4 years old; body mass index, 31.1 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2); hemoglobin A1c, 7.0 +/- 1.3%). After 1 week of continued glimiperide therapy, the patients were randomized either to continue with their oral treatment or to switch to a fixed-dose supplementary insulin therapy (8 U of insulin aspart subcutaneously before each meal) for another week. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) after drug uptake were performed at days 7 and 14, with measurement of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, intact and total proinsulin, glucagon, lactate, free fatty acids, and adiponectin.. Significant reductions from baseline were seen in the supplementary insulin therapy group for the fasting values of insulin (from 13.1 +/- 5.1 microU/mL to 10.6 +/- 5.2 microU/mL, P < 0.01), intact proinsulin (from 18.3 +/- 11.2 pmol/L to 10.3 +/- 4.6 pmol/L, P micro 0.05), total proinsulin (from 43.3 +/- 22.7 pmol/L to 29.7 +/- 14.5 pmol/L, P < 0.01), split proinsulin (from 24.9 +/- 13.8 pmol/L to 19.4 +/- 10.8 pmol/L, P micro 0.01), and the degree of beta-cell dysfunction (P < 0.05). Also, lower values for intact and total proinsulin and split proinsulin in the OGTT were observed in this group during the OGTT at the end point, while no changes at all occurred in the glimepiride group.. A fixed low-dose preprandial insulin aspart therapy resulted in an overall beta-cell protection with an improved fasting beta-cell secretion profile already within 1 week. Our study indicates that supplementary insulin therapy might be a reasonable alternative to bedtime basal insulin injections for initiation of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Oxidase; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Proinsulin; Sulfonylurea Compounds

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled with a combination of immediate- or extended-release metformin and a thiazolidinedione.. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-arm study consisting of a 4-week stabilization and eligibility period and a 26-week treatment period. Patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for a minimum of 1 year received glimepiride (titrated sequentially from 2 to 4 to 8 mg/d over 6 weeks, followed by 20 weeks of maintenance therapy) or placebo in combination with an established regimen of immediate- or extended release metformin and rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline. The safety analysis was based on the incidence of hypo glycemia, adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities. Changes in lipid levels (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) were evaluated, and health-related quality of life was assessed based on scores on the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HU13).. Of 170 randomized patients, 159 were included in the efficacy analysis and 168 were included in the safety analysis. Demographic variables were similar at baseline between the glimepiride and placebo groups (mean age, 56.5 and 56.4 years, respectively; percent men/women, 61.0%/39.0% and 62.3%/37.7%; weight, 100.9 and 96.3 kg). HbA(1c) was significantly improved at end point with glimepiride combination therapy compared with placebo (mean [SE], -1.31% [0.08] vs -0.33% [0.08], respectively; P < 0.001). The majority of patients (62.2%) who received glimepiride achieved an HbA(1c) value of < or =7%, compared with 26.0% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 between groups). At end point, the adjusted mean differences between treatments significantly favored the glimepiride combination in terms of fasting plasma glucose (-37.4 [4.0] mg/dL; P < 0.001), fasting insulin (4.06 [1.69] microIU/mL; P < 0.03), and C-peptide (124.5 [35.9] pmol/L; P < 0.001). The adjusted mean changes in body mass index from baseline to end point were 1.26 (0.16) kg/m(2) with glimepiride and 0.17 (0.16) kg/m(2) with placebo (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean change in weight was greater with glimepiride than with placebo (3.76 [0.54] vs 0.45 [0.52] kg; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in lipid levels between groups. Clinically significant adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar between treatment groups. The overall incidence of hypoglycemia, however, was 51.2% in the glimepiride group and 8.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In general, there was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to scores on the DCP or HUI3 over the study period.. In these patients with type 2 diabetes that was not adequately controlled by dual combination therapy with metformin and a thiazolidinedione, the addition of glimepiride improved glycemic control compared with placebo with an acceptable tolerability profile. Although there were significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia with triple therapy than with dual therapy and placebo, the risk for severe hypoglycemia was low.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Rosiglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Time Factors

To compare the effect of Repaglinide vs Glimepiride on glucose- and meal-induced insulin secretion and on meal-test induced postprandial glucose excursions.. After 2 weeks washout period, a 3-Month randomised, cross-over parallel group trial of R (1 mg x 2/die) vs G (2 mg/die) in 14 patients with type 2 diabetes "naive" in diet treatment was made.. Both R and G significantly but similarly lowered fasting glucose levels and improved fasting plasma insulin levels vs baseline. Hyperglycemic clamp showed that both 1st (129.15 +/- 23.6 vs 106.90 +/- 18.6 pmol/L; p=0.01) and 2nd phase (189.42 +/- 34.4 vs 144.21 +/- 37.3 pmol/L; p=0.003) B-cell response to glucose as well as area under the curve (52.07 +/- 10.86 vs 39.54 +/- 10.27 micromol/L x 120'; p=0.005) were greater in R than G groups. Insulin action (4.0 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 0.9 mg x Kg x 60'/microU/mL; p=0.046) was also improved by R than G administration. In the meal test, R therapy produced a more rapId induction of insulin secretion during the first part. In fact, the mean rise in insulin secretion peaked at 45 min in R (p=0.001 vs G) and at 60 min in G (p=0.001 vs R). Consequently, glucose spike at 60 min was higher in G group compared to glucose spike at 45 min in R group (p=0.002).. Our study demonstrates that R is more efficient that G on improving glucose- and meal- induced insulin secretion as well as on controlling for postprandial glucose excursion.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Carbamates; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Postprandial Period; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; Triglycerides

To determine the efficacy of, and compliance with, glimepiride or acarbose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.. Two hundred and nineteen patients with Type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet alone were randomized to receive either glimepiride (1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 mg once daily, n = 111) or acarbose (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg 3 times daily, n = 108). Both drugs were titrated in a 6-week dose-finding phase to achieve a fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentration < or = 7.8 mmol/ (140 mg/dl). Patients achieving this target entered a 20-week treatment period. Efficacy was assessed by responder rate, number of patients achieving a FBG of < or = 7.8 mmol/l, HbA1c, blood glucose concentrations in response to a standard breakfast, body weight and compliance.. Glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater responder rate than acarbose (61 vs 34%, p < 0.001), significantly greater decreases in HbA1c (2.5 +/- 2.2% vs 1.8 +/- 2.2%, p = 0.014) and FBG (2.6 +/- 2.6 mmol/l vs 1.4 +/- 2.8 mmo/l, p = 0.004), a decreased glucose response to breakfast compared with acarbose [area under curve (AUC) end: 8.9 +/- 2.7 mmol/l vs 11.3 +/- 3.9 mmol/l, p = 0.0001], and was accompanied by significantly greater compliance (91 < or = 12% vs 66 +/- 26%, p = 0.0001). Weight loss during the study was observed in both the acarbose group (1.9 +/- 3.9 kg, p = 0.001) and glimepiride group [0.4 +/- 5.2 kg, p = 0.8 (NS)].. Improved efficacy and greater compliance were observed in response to treatment with glimepiride compared with acarbose, in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Acarbose; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of glimepiride on insulin sensitivity and secretion in subjects with type 2 diabetes.. After a 2-week washout from prior sulfonylurea therapy, 11 obese subjects with type 2 diabetes underwent euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp studies before and during glimepiride therapy.. Glimepiride resulted in a 2.4-mmol/l decrease in fasting plasma glucose (P = 0.04) that was correlated with reductions in postabsorptive endogenous glucose production (EGP) (16.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 13.5 +/- 0.5 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1), P = 0.01) (r = 0.21, P = 0.01). Postabsorptive EGP on glimepiride was similar to that of control subjects (12.8 +/- 0.9 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1), NS). Fasting plasma insulin (66 +/- 18 vs. 84 +/- 48 pmol/l, P = 0.05), and first-phase (19 +/- 8 vs. 32 +/- 11 pmol/l, P = 0.04) and second-phase incremental insulin responses to glucose (48 +/- 23 vs. 72 +/- 32 pmol/l, P = 0.02) improved with glimepiride therapy. Insulin sensitivity did not change with treatment (4.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.7 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1). pmol(-1)) and remained below that of control subjects (8.1 +/- 1.8 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1). pmol(-1), P = 0.04).. The current study demonstrates that glimepiride improves both first and second phases of insulin secretion, but not insulin sensitivity, in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin Secretion; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Glibenclamide attenuates the protective responses to opening of vascular ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels during ischaemia. Therefore, glibenclamide treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus may have hazardous cardiovascular effects when used under conditions of ischaemia. Glimepiride and metformin seem to lack such characteristics. Based on these data, we hypothesized that, in contrast to glibenclamide, chronic treatment of Type 2 diabetic patients with glimepiride or metformin will not impair the vasodilator function of K(ATP) opening in vivo.. Two groups of 12 Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients participated in a double-blind randomized cross-over study consisting of two 8-week periods, in which treatment with orally administered glibenclamide (15 mg/day) was compared with either glimepiride or metformin (6 mg and 1500 mg/day, respectively). At the end of each treatment period, the increase in forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) in response to intra-arterial administered diazoxide (K(ATP) opener), acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilator) and dipyridamole (adenosine-uptake blocker) and to forearm ischaemia was measured.. There were no significant differences in vasodilator responses to diazoxide, acetylcholine, dipyridamole and forearm ischaemia after glibenclamide compared with glimepiride and metformin.. Chronic treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glimepiride or metformin has similar effects on vascular K(ATP) channels compared with chronic glibenclamide treatment.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diazoxide; Dipyridamole; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forearm; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Vasodilation

Sulfonylureas are used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus when diet and exercise fail. Glimepiride, a new sulfonylurea, can be administered in one daily dose, thanks to its pharmacokinetic properties. We attempted to establish the optimal time of day for the administration of Glimepiride in a group of patients from the Mediterranean area by clinical trial. No relationship was found between the time of administration and fasting blood glucose values, or HbA1c, or the frequency or severity of hypoglycemic episodes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Lipids; Middle Aged; Placebos; Prospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors

A single-center, randomised, placebo- controlled, cross-over study was conducted to characterize the new sulfonylurea glimepiride and to compare its profile of action with the second generation sulfonylurea glibenclamide. The total duration of each experiment was 5 hours. At zero time an i.v. injection of 2 and 4 mg glimepiride, 1 mg glibenclamide or placebo was given i.v. to 24 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected for three hours after the injection (0-3 hours, preprandial experiment). At 3 hours, a standard mixed meal was given (20%, of a 30 Kcal/Kg Body Weight diet) and blood samples were collected for 2 more hours (postprandial experiment). Pre-prandially (0-3 hrs) blood glucose (expressed as the area under the curve divided by the time) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) after the administration of 2 and 4 mg glimepiride (3.8 +/- 0.22 and 3.5 +/- 0.3 mM respectively) compared to placebo (4.63 +/- 0.31 mM), but not compared to glibenclamide. Insulin and C-peptide were not different after glimepiride or glibenclamide. Both glimepiride and glibenclamide had similar effects on insulin secretion. Post-prandially (3-5 hrs) blood glucose was significantly higher after glibenclamide (6.54 +/- 0.8 mM) (p < 0.0001) than after 2 mg glimepiride (5.75 +/- 0.5 mM). Despite this C-peptide was significantly higher (p < 0.002) glibenclamide (5.7 +/- 1.5 ng/ml) compared to glimepiride (5.1 +/- 1.3 ng/ml); the trend was the same for insulin but the results were not significantly different (p = 0.06) In conclusion, in the fasting state, glimepiride and glibenclamide had similar effects on the changes in blood glucose levels after i.v. administration. After the meal, less pronounced hyperglycemia and lower insulin and C-peptide levels following glimepiride (2 mg) suggests either that glimepiride induces insulin secretion through a pathway which is different from that of glibenclamide or that glimepiride facilitates insulin action through extrapancreatic effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Fasting; Food; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Sulfonylurea Compounds

This study tested a simple algorithm for beginning insulin for obese patients with type 2 diabetes after sulfonylurea failure, comparing suppertime 70/30 insulin plus continued glimepiride with insulin alone.. This was a multicenter ambulatory randomized double-masked parallel comparison. There were 208 subjects with secondary failure to sulfonylureas who took glimepiride titrated to 8 mg b.i.d. for 8 weeks; 145 subjects with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 180-300 mg/dl (10-16.7 mmol/l) on this treatment were randomized to placebo plus insulin (PI) or glimepiride plus insulin (GI) for 24 weeks. A dosage of 70/30 insulin before supper was titrated, seeking fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) 120 mg/dl (6.7 mmol/l), equivalent to FPG 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l). Outcome measures included FPG, HbA1c, insulin dosage, weight, serum insulin and lipids, and adverse events.. FPG and HbA1c were equivalent at baseline: 261 vs. 250 mg/dl (14.5 vs. 13.9 mmol/l), and 9.9 vs. 9.7%. At 24 weeks, the FPG target was achieved in both groups (136 vs. 138 mg/dl, 7.6 vs. 7.6 mmol/l), and HbA1c values were equal (7.7 vs. 7.6%). However, with GI, control improved faster and fewer subjects dropped out (3 vs. 15%, P < 0.01), and less insulin was needed (49 vs. 78 U/d, P < 0.001). The outcomes were alike in other respects. No subject had severe hypoglycemia.. Injection of 70/30 insulin before supper safely restored glycemic control of type 2 diabetes not controlled by glimepiride alone. Control was restored more rapidly and with less injected insulin when glimepiride was continued.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Patient Dropouts; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study of glimepiride, a new oral sulfonylurea, was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes for whom dietary treatment was unsuccessful (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] = 151-300 mg/dL) during a 1-week screening period. Patients were randomized to receive glimepiride (n = 123) or placebo (n = 126) once daily for a 10-week dose-titration period, then maintained on an individually determined optimal dose (1-8 mg of glimepiride or placebo) for 12 weeks. Glimepiride lowered FPG by 46 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) by 1.4%, and 2-hour postprandial glucose by 72 mg/dL more than placebo. Glimepiride improved postprandial insulin and C-peptide responses without producing clinically meaningful increases in fasting insulin or C-peptide levels. Good glycemic control (HbA1C < or = 7.2%) was achieved by 69% of the patients taking glimepiride versus 32% of those taking placebo. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. No clinically noteworthy abnormal laboratory values or hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 60 mg/dL) occurred. Glimepiride is safe and effective for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes for whom diet therapy is unsuccessful.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To investigate the metabolic effects and frequency of adverse events with 6 mg of glimepiride, a new oral sulfonylurea, given both in once- and twice-daily dosages to patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).. This 15-week study involved 161 subjects with NIDDM. Subjects were randomized into two groups. For 4 weeks, group 1 received glimepiride 3 mg twice daily, and group 2 received glimepiride 6 mg once daily. After a 3-week placebo-washout period, twice- and once-daily regimens were crossed over for a second 4-week treatment period. Subjects were hospitalized at the end of each placebo or active-treatment phase. Their glucose concentrations were recorded at 20 time points over a 24-hour period, and their insulin and C-peptide concentrations were recorded at 16 time points over the same period. Parameters that were calculated included fasting, 24-hour, and postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide.. One hundred six patients were randomized to receive treatment; 94 completed the entire study. Existing physiologic mechanisms of glucose control were apparently unimpaired by glimepiride treatment. Insulin concentrations increased more during the postprandial glucose peaks than when subjects were fasting. Both twice- and once-daily regimens proved equally effective in reducing concentrations of fasting, postbreakfast, postlunch, and postdinner plasma glucose. Twenty-four-hour mean glucose concentrations showed a slightly greater decrease from baseline for the twice-daily regimen; the difference between the regimens was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. The incidence of adverse events with glimepiride approximated that obtained with placebo, with both groups reporting only one adverse event, headache, in more than 5% of the subjects.. Glimepiride is equally effective whether administered once or twice daily. Glimepiride seems to stimulate insulin production primarily after meals, when plasma glucose concentrations are highest, but controls blood glucose throughout the day.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The aim of the present study was to assess the beta cell response to glimepiride, administered orally, during and following a hyperglycaemic clamp in 14 NIDDM patients (7 males), aged 62.5 (St. Dev. 7.7) years with a body mass index of 27.3 (2.8) kg m(-2) and HbA(Ic) of 7.0 (0.7)% at baseline, in a placebo controlled study. All patients were on stable treatment with a second generation sulphonylurea for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization and received placebo (P) or 5 mg glimepiride (G) daily for 7 days and 10 mg prior to a hyperglycaemic clamp (10.9 mmol l(-1) for 60 min, preceded by i.v. insulin infusion to stabilize fasting blood glucose levels at 4.0 mmol l(-1)). The clamp was followed by an observation period of 2 h in 5 subjects and 3.5 h in the next 9 subjects, during which blood glucose and plasma insulin, C-peptide and proinsulin levels were measured at regular intervals to determine the effect of glimepiride on the interaction between changes in glycaemia and plasma levels of beta cell products. Neither G nor P elicited a first phase insulin response. Areas under plasma insulin curve during the 1 h hyperglycaemic clamp were 94.2 (39.5) vs 69.1 (26.5) pmol.h l(-1) in G and P clamps, respectively (p = 0.002). Total areas (AUC) under the plasma insulin curve were 377 (145) vs 271 (113) pmol.h l(-1) in G and P clamps (< 0.05). Total AUCs of C-peptide were 309 (96) and 259 (102 pmol.h.(-1), in G and P clamps, respectively, p = 0.01. Total AUCs of proinsulin were 176 (77) versus 119 (56) pmol.h l(-1) in G and P clamps, respectively, p = 0.004. Five hours after G and P administration blood glucose levels were 4.7) 92.1) mmol(-1) in the G clamp vs 6.2 (1.9) mmol l(-1) in the P clamp (p = 0.001). The number of hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 3.0 mmol l(-1)) in the 3.5 h observation period was 3 in G clamps vs 0 in P clamps (p = ns). In conclusion, glimepiride stimulates the second phase insulin and proinsulin secretion. The lowering of blood glucose levels is not accompanied by a commensurate inhibition of the insulin secretion. Further studies are required to compare this new drug with currently available oral hypoglycaemic agents, with respect to glycaemic control and the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Proinsulin; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Sulfonylureas predispose to hypoglycaemia during and after exercise. The hypoglycaemic effect of the novel sulfonylurea glimepiride (G; CAS 93479-97-1) in male healthy volunteers under these conditions. Each subject was exposed to three experimental situations, administration of 3 mg G and rest, administration of 3 mg G and 60 min of bicycle ergometry (E) (work load adjusted to a heart rate of 120 bpm), or placebo (P) and bicycle ergometry as mentioned. Each of these was preceded and followed by 60 min of physical rest. Base line glycaemia was comparable (PE 83 +/- 8 mg/dl, GR 84 +/- 5 mg/dl, GE 86 +/- 7 mg/dl) and fell during GR to 63 +/- 6 mg/dl after 150 min. During GE glycaemia ceased to decline after 30 min exercise, and rose thereafter reaching values comparable to PE after 150 min (80 +/- 8 vs. 82 +/- 7 mg/dl). Serum insulin concentrations rose during exercise following administration of G to 6-7 microU/ml (AUC during the period 60-120 min after administration: GE 371 +/- 81 microU/ml.60 min, GR 414 +/- 77 microU/ml.60 min), and fell during PE to 4 microU/ml (265 +/- 49 microU/ml.60; p < 0.001 vs. GE and GR). During GE serum insulin concentrations fell to 6 microU/ml at the end of exercise and thereafter (AUC during the period 120-180 min after administration: 340 +/- 82 microU/ml.60 min), whereas they remained at 7 microU/ml during GR (399 +/- 109 microU/ml.60 min; p = 0.087 vs. GE). In conclusion, exercise blunts the hypoglycaemic effect of glimepiride in healthy individuals.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Exercise; Exercise Test; Female; Glucagon; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Lactates; Lactic Acid; Male; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Glimepiride is a new sulphonylurea which is eliminated by the formation of a hydroxy-metabolite (hydroxy-gli) and a carboxymetabolite (carboxy-gli). Animal studies have shown hydroxy-gli to exhibit some hypoglycaemic effects while carboxy-gli does not appear to have any pharmacological activity. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of hydroxy-gli were assessed in humans. 12 healthy male volunteers received an intravenous injection of hydroxy-gli (1.5 mg) or placebo in a single blind, randomised, cross-over study. Samples were collected for up to 24 hours (blood) or 48 hours (urine) following administration of hydroxy-gli or placebo. Hydroxy-gli significantly decreased the minimum serum concentration (Cmin) of glucose by 12% and the average serum glucose concentration over the first four hours of treatment (Cavg0-4) by 9% compared with placebo (P < or = 0.05). In addition, maximum serum C-peptide concentration (Cmax) and Cavg0-4 were both increased by 7% after hydroxy-gli (p < or = 0.05). Serum insulin concentrations (Cmax and Cavg0-4) increased by 4% but the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported during the study. In conclusion, the hydroxymetabolite of glimepiride shows pharmacological activity in human subjects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Biotransformation; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Half-Life; Humans; Hydroxylation; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Intravenous; Insulin; Male; Single-Blind Method; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To compare the efficacy and safety of two daily doses of the new sulfonylurea, glimepiride (Amaryl), each as a once-daily dose or in two divided doses, in patients with NIDDM.. Of the previously treated NIDDM patients, 416 entered this multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled fixed-dose study. After a 3-week placebo washout, patients received a 14-week course of placebo or glimepiride 8 mg q.d., 4 mg b.i.d., 16 mg q.d., or 8 mg b.i.d.. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c values were similar at baseline in all treatment groups. The placebo group's FPG value increased from 13.0 mmol/l at baseline to 14.5 mmol/l at the last evaluation endpoint (P < or = 0.001). In contrast, FPG values in the four glimepiride groups decreased from a range of 12.4-12.9 mmol/l at baseline to a range of 8.6-9.8 mmol/l at endpoint (P < or = 0.001, within-group change from baseline; P < or = 0.001, between-group change [vs. placebo] from baseline). Two-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) findings were consistent with FPG findings. In the placebo group, the HbA1c value increased from 7.7% at baseline to 9.7% at endpoint (P < or = 0.001), whereas HbA1c values for the glimepiride groups were 7.9-8.1% at baseline and 7.4-7.6% at endpoint (P < or = 0.001, within-group change from baseline; P < or = 0.001, between-group change from baseline). There were no meaningful differences in glycemic variables between daily doses of 8 and 16 mg or between once- and twice-daily dosing. Adverse events and laboratory data demonstrate that glimepiride has a favorable safety profile.. Glimepiride is an effective and well-tolerated oral glucose-lowering agent. The results of this study demonstrate maximum effectiveness can be achieved with 8 mg q.d. of glimepiride in NIDDM subjects.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors

We report on the results of a one-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group titration study of the new sulfonylurea agent, glimepiride, versus use of non-micronized glyburide to treat 577 patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Similar decreases in both fasting plasma glucose and HbA1C were found using glimepiride and glyburide. There was a lower incidence of hypoglycemia with glimepiride than glyburide.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glyburide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The comparative effects of glimepiride (Amaryl; HOE 490) and glibenclamide on insulin and glucose metabolism under hyperglycaemic and hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp conditions were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Patients with sulfonylurea-controlled non insulin-dependent diabetes were allocated in random order to placebo, glimepiride (5 mg) or glibenclamide (5 mg) and received one week treatment of each with no wash-out period. At the end of each treatment week a clamp study was performed. Two protocols were used. Protocol 1 used a 5 h hyperglycaemic clamp at 10.9 mmol/l whole blood glucose concentration and Protocol II used a 3 h hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic damp at 3.5 mmol/l whole blood glucose concentration. Both glimepiride and glibenclamide exhibited a hypoglycaemic effect. A significant reduction in fasting whole blood glucose concentration was observed after one-week treatment of each active agent (fasting glucose: glimepiride v. placebo, 9.3 +/- 0.7 v. 10.7 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, p < 0.02; glibenclamide v. placebo, 8.9 +/- 0.9 v. 10.7 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, p < 0.005). This hypoglycaemic action of both preparations administered in equivalent daily dose appeared comparable. Glimepiride and glibenclamide stimulated beta-cell secretion and in the basal state both beta-cell secretory products insulin and C-peptide, were elevated in the plasma (basal C-peptide concentration: glimepiride v. placebo, 0.79 +/- 0.08 v. 0.68 +/- 0.07 nmol/l, p < 0.01; glibenclamide v. placebo, 0.79 +/- 0.07 v. 0.68 +/- 0.07 nmol/l, p < 0.004). This insulinotropic effect appeared to be comparable with no demonstrable difference in the efficacy of the two preparations. Under steady-state hyperglycaemic conditions both agents promoted insulin release (stimulated C-peptide concentration; glimepiride v. placebo, 1.39 +/- 0.16 v. 1.11 +/- 0.20 nmol/l, p < 0.006; glibenclamide v. placebo. 1.60 +/- 0.18 v. 1.11 +/- 0.20 nmol/l, p < 0.001) and there was no statistically significant difference between active treatments. Under steady-state euglycaemia both preparations continued to stimulate insulin release as evidenced by the mean plasma C-peptide concentrations (glimepiride v. placebo, 0.69 +/- 0.10 v. 0.28 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, p < 0.01; glibenclamide v. placebo, 0.76 +/- 0.12 v. 0.28 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, p < 0.01). Both glimepiride and glibenclamide had a comparable and significant enhancing effect on glucose metabolism (Protocol II: M: glimepiride v. placebo 4

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glyburide; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Placebos; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The effects of exercise on metabolic control in type II diabetic patients given glimepiride or glibenclamide were studied in a multinational phase II clinical trial (14 centers in 4 countries). A total of 167 type II diabetic out-patients (117 men, 50 women) completed the trial as planned. The study was of parallel group, 2 x 2 factorial design: patients were first stabilized in a randomized, double-blind manner on 3 mg of glimepiride or 10 mg of glibenclamide treatment once daily over 14-28 days and were then assigned in randomized open fashion to a group with or without exercise. Exercise consisted of riding a bicycle ergometer for 1 hour at pulse rate 120 beats per minute. Three-hour blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were made after the stabilization phase (baseline profiles) and 7 days later with or without exercise (endpoint profiles). Pairwise comparisons of changes in blood glucose AUC/1-3 h revealed a statistically significant decrease in patients who exercised vs those who did not, which was comparable for both sulfonylureas used. There was a statistically significant decrease in C-peptide AUC/1-3 h and insulin AUC/1-3 h in the glimepiride exercise group vs the glimepiride group without exercise. Physical exercise did not lead to statistically significant changes in C-peptide AUC/1-3 h and insulin AUC/1-3 h under glibenclamide treatment. In conclusion, a blood-glucose-lowering response to acute exercise was demonstrated in type II diabetic patients treated with either sulfonylurea, but a significant suppression of endogenous insulin secretion was observed for glimepiride only.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Exercise; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

This study evaluates stimulated insulin production rate (incremental AUC x MCR (metabolic clearance rate) of C-peptide) and blood glucose (BG) response after i.v. administration of glimepiride (Hoe 490, GLI, CAS 93479-97-1) (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50 mg) in healthy man (27 +/- 4 yrs). It was shown that i.v. bolus administration of GLI (0.25, 0.50, 1.25 and 1.50 mg) caused a dose-related rise in insulin production from 18 +/- 17 to 25 +/- 13, 36 +/- 14 and 54 +/- 34 pmol/kg body weight, respectively. This effect did not yet plateau at 1.5 mg GLI and was paralleled by a fall in BG (decremental area below BG baseline) by 40 +/- 36, 69 +/- 20, 161 +/- 47 and 113 +/- 62 mmol.min/l. It is concluded that insulin release is increased by i.v. GLI in a dose related manner, while a parallel decline in BG was induced only up to 1.25 mg GLI. The less marked fall of BG after injection of 1.50 mg GLI may reflect interference by insulin-counterregulatory hormones secondary to induced hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Intravenous; Insulin; Male; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a group of disorders accounting for 2-5% of diabetes; MODY2 is caused by inactivating GCK mutations. We report a case of MODY2 caused by a novel GCK mutation and demonstrate differential glycemic/C-peptide responses to treatment with insulin, no medication, and an oral sulfonylurea.

Topics: Adolescent; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Glucokinase; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Mutation; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Given evidence of both indirect and direct signaling, we tested the hypothesis that increased beta-cell-mediated signaling of alpha-cells negates direct alpha-cell signaling in the regulation of glucagon secretion in humans.. We measured plasma glucagon concentrations before and after ingestion of a formula mixed meal and, on a separate occasion, ingestion of the sulfonylurea glimepiride in 24 basal insulin-infused, demonstrably beta-cell-deficient patients with type 1 diabetes and 20 nondiabetic, demonstrably beta-cell-sufficient individuals; the latter were infused with glucose to prevent hypoglycemia after glimepiride.. After the mixed meal, plasma glucagon concentrations increased from 22 +/- 1 pmol/l (78 +/- 4 pg/ml) to 30 +/- 2 pmol/l (103 +/- 7 pg/ml) in the patients with type 1 diabetes but were unchanged from 27 +/- 1 pmol/l (93 +/- 3 pg/ml) to 26 +/- 1 pmol/l (89 +/- 3 pg/ml) in the nondiabetic individuals (P < 0.0001). After glimepiride, plasma glucagon concentrations increased from 24 +/- 1 pmol/l (83 +/- 4 pg/ml) to 26 +/- 1 pmol/l (91 +/- 4 pg/ml) in the patients with type 1 diabetes and decreased from 28 +/- 1 pmol/l (97 +/- 5 pg/ml) to 24 +/- 1 pmol/l (82 +/- 4 pg/ml) in the nondiabetic individuals (P < 0.0001). Thus, in the presence of both beta-cell and alpha-cell secretory stimuli (increased amino acid and glucose levels, a sulfonylurea) glucagon secretion was prevented when beta-cell secretion was sufficient but not when beta-cell secretion was deficient.. These data indicate that, among the array of signals, indirect reciprocal beta-cell-mediated signaling predominates over direct alpha-cell signaling in the regulation of glucagon secretion in humans.

Topics: C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Eating; Epinephrine; Fasting; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Secreting Cells; Homeostasis; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Reference Values; Signal Transduction; Sulfonylurea Compounds

One of the clinical features of myotonic dystrophy is insulin resistance with non-obese diabetes mellitus (DM). Recently, the mechanism of insulin resistance in patients with myotonic dystrophy was revealed. The optimal treatment of DM with myotonic dystrophy has not been established. We report the effect of metformin in a patient with myotonic dystrophy without obesity.. A 58-year-old woman (BMI = 22.1 kg/m2) with myotonic dystrophy and DM was followed at our clinic. She had been treated with glimepiride for DM for the last 6 months, without achieving good control (HbA(1c) 9.3%). She was admitted with congestive heart failure and cholecystitis. She was treated with diuretics, antibiotics and insulin. As her blood glucose fell, we discontinued insulin and started glimepiride, but her glycaemic control had worsened. We started metformin instead of glimepiride. After 4 weeks of metformin, HbA(1c) was decreased to 7.4%, while HOMA-IR during glimepiride treatment was 4.9, and 3.7 with metformin. Three months later, HbA(1c) was maintained (7.5%).. It is important to choose the optimal treatment for DM in myotonic dystrophy, because the patients have hyperinsulinemia caused by specific mechanism and could not reduce the insulin resistance. Metformin improved hyperglycemia through increased insulin-independent glucose uptake in peripheral muscle. We believe metformin is the optimal agent for these patients.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Metformin; Middle Aged; Myotonic Dystrophy; Sulfonylurea Compounds

We retrospectively investigated the effects of adding glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes showing suboptimal control by insulin therapy. Of 63 patients with poorly controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (baseline HbA1c, 8.4 +/- 0.6%), 32 were treated with insulin alone and 31 were given glimepiride in addition to insulin. HbA1c values, daily insulin dose, body weight, blood pressure, plasma lipid concentrations, and the number of hypoglycemic events were recorded at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72. HbA1c decreased by 1.1%, from 8.5 +/- 0.6% to 7.4 +/- 0.8% (P<0.0001) in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride at 12 weeks, and improved glycemic control continued throughout the study. Required insulin dose was reduced significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 29.4 +/- 14.5 to 22.3 +/- 12.1 units/day, P = 0.0187). Body weight increased significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 57.0 +/- 8.7 to 59.5 +/- 9.2 kg, P = 0.0232). Adding glimepiride showed little effect on blood pressure, plasma total cholesterol, triglyceride, or HDL-cholesterol. Serum C peptide concentrations increased significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 1.01 +/- 0.71 to 1.28 +/- 0.65 ng/ml, P = 0.0367). The number of hypoglycemic events did not differ between groups. Adding glimepiride to insulin therapy resulted in sustained improvement of glycemic control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Patients with type 2 diabetes who are failing on oral agents will generally gain a large amount of body fat when switched to insulin treatment. This adverse effect may be related to chronic hyperinsulinism induced by long-acting insulin compounds.. To test the concept that regain of glycaemic control can be achieved without causing weight gain, using a regimen free of long-acting insulin.. In a 3-month open-label pilot study including 25 patients with moderate overweight and secondary failure, we investigated whether nocturnal glycaemic control could be achieved with glimepiride administered at 20:00 hours. The starting dose was 1-2 mg, with subsequent titration up to a maximum of 6 mg. Rapid-acting insulin analogues were used three times daily to regain postprandial glucose control.. Glycaemic control at 3 months was established with glimepiride in a dose of 4.4 +/- 0.3 mg/day (mean +/- standard error of the mean), and a total daily insulin dose of 24.1 +/- 2.6 IU. Fasting glucose levels decreased from 12.7 +/- 0.6 mmol/l to 8.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (p < 0.001), and target levels were reached in 14 of 25 patients (56%). Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.5 +/- 0.4 to 7.7 +/- 0.2% (p < 0.001). Symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycaemia was not reported. Body weight did not change (85.7 +/- 3.6 kg vs. 85.7 +/- 3.3 kg, p = 0.99).. The data suggest that this new approach may be useful in about 50% of type 2 diabetes patients presenting with failure on maximal oral treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Gain

We report a case of an 82 year-old woman who had two episodes of documented hypoglycemia. Initial laboratory testing revealed hyperinsulinemia and a negative serum sulfonylurea screen. While these data suggested the presence of an insulinoma, further evaluation of the case revealed inadvertent ingestion of glimepiride, a sulfonylurea not included in the standard serum sulfonylurea screen.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Overdose; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Sulfonylurea Compounds

This study addressed whether acute infusion of glimepiride influences glucose metabolism independent of its effect on insulin secretion.. Ten healthy, glucose-tolerant but insulin-resistant probands were subjected to a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study. Each individual received infusions of either 0.15 mol/l saline or glimepiride in randomized order on two separate occasions. A three-step hyperinsulinemic (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mU. kg(-1). min(-1))-euglycemic glucose clamp was performed on both occasions to determine insulin sensitivity. Glimepiride-induced insulin secretion was inhibited by octreotide. Endogenous glucose production and glucose elimination were measured with the "hot" glucose infusion method using U-[(13)C]glucose as tracer. Glucose oxidation was determined from indirect calorimetry. Lipolysis was evaluated by measurements of nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) and glycerol concentration and measurement of glycerol production.. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were not significantly different between glimepiride or saline infusions. There was a significant increase in the rate of glucose infusion necessary to maintain euglycemia during infusion of glimepiride during the low- (12.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 16.1 +/- 1.7 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1)) and intermediate-dose insulin infusion (24.4 +/- 1.7 vs. 30.0 +/- 2.8 micro mol. kg(-1). min(-1)). This was explained by an increased rate of glucose elimination and to a lesser degree by a decrease in glucose production. Glucose oxidation rate was not different. NEFA and glycerol concentration and glycerol production were equally suppressed.. Glimepiride improves peripheral glucose uptake and decreases endogenous glucose production independent of its insulin secretagogue action. The effects shown in this acute study are, however, too small to be considered therapeutically beneficial for the individual patient.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Kinetics; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Nuclear Family; Reference Values; Sulfonylurea Compounds