buprenorphine has been researched along with acetylcodeine* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for buprenorphine and acetylcodeine
Article | Year |
---|---|
Evaluation of an on-site test device for the heroin metabolite 6-acetylmorphine in urine.
Detection of heroin use is an important task in clinical drug testing and can be best performed by using 6-acetylmorphine as the target analyte. This study was performed to evaluate an on-site test for 6-acetylmorphine screening in urine with an assigned cut-off limit at 10 ng/mL. The reference method was a forensic accredited liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The study confirmed that negative controls and negative authentic specimen resulted in negative readings. Low cross-reactivity was recorded from other potential interfering opioids. Prepared standards and commercial calibrators demonstrated that the cutoff level of the test was lower than the assigned value and rather 2 ng/mL. A study using authentic specimens from patients on substitution treatment with methadone, morphine, and buprenorphine confirmed that the real cut-off level was 2 ng/mL. Using this value as cutoff limit the sensitivity and specificity of the test was 100%. Topics: Buprenorphine; Codeine; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Heroin; Humans; Methadone; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Reagent Strips; Sensitivity and Specificity; Substance Abuse Detection | 2019 |
Prevalence of heroin markers in urine for pain management patients.
Surveys of current trends indicate heroin abuse is associated with nonmedical use of pain relievers. Consequently, there is an interest in evaluating the presence of heroin-specific markers in chronic pain patients who are prescribed controlled substances. A total of 926,084 urine specimens from chronic pain patients were tested for heroin/diacetylmorphine (DAM), 6-acetylmorphine (6AM), 6-acetylcodeine (6AC), codeine (COD), and morphine (MOR). Heroin and markers were analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Opiates were analyzed following hydrolysis using LC-MS-MS. The prevalence of heroin use was 0.31%, as 2871 were positive for one or more heroin-specific markers including DAM, 6AM, or 6AC (a known contaminant of illicit heroin). Of these, 1884 were additionally tested for the following markers of illicit drug use: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), methamphetamine (MAMP), 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ(9)-tetracannabinol (THCCOOH), and benzoylecgonine (BZE); 654 (34.7%) had positive findings for one or more of these analytes. The overall prevalence of heroin markers were as follows: DAM 1203 (41.9%), 6AM 2570 (89.5%), 6AC 1082 (37.7%). MOR was present in 2194 (76.4%) and absent ( Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Biomarkers; Buprenorphine; Chromatography, Liquid; Chronic Pain; Codeine; Heroin; Heroin Dependence; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Methadone; Morphine Derivatives; Pain Clinics; Tandem Mass Spectrometry | 2014 |