bivalirudin and cangrelor

Mortality and morbidity in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), caused principally by plaque erosion or rupture leading to thrombus formation and myocardial ischemia, have been reduced by a combination of antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants) and early revascularization. Aspirin is the foundation antiplatelet agent. New P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have clear benefits compared with clopidogrel for dual antiplatelet therapy, and cangrelor or vorapaxar, a thrombin receptor inhibitor, may be of value in specific settings. Anticoagulation uses 1 of 4 choices: bivalirudin, unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux. Moreover, some patients (such as those who have chronic atrial fibrillation) require triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, plus an anticoagulant, frequently a vitamin K antagonist. New oral anticoagulants have been shown to be at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation and led to fewer bleeding complications. Finally, the combination of aspirin, clopidogrel, and low-dose rivaroxaban has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (but not the Food and Drug Administration) for secondary prevention after ACS. Several strategies have been developed to balance the potential benefit of antithrombotic therapy against the risk of bleeding complications, for example, radial access in coronary angiography or restricted use of combination therapy, and others are under investigation, such as discontinuation of aspirin. This overview summarizes the current status of antithrombotic therapy in ACS and describes strategies currently explored to optimize its benefit/risk ratio.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Eptifibatide; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Lactones; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Recombinant Proteins; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Tirofiban; Tyrosine; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and bleeding outcomes of cangrelor in patients in the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin.. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor with rapid onset and offset. In the CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced 48-h ischemic events including stent thrombosis, without increasing major bleeding. Bivalirudin has demonstrated ischemic outcomes similar to those with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, with reduced bleeding but increased early stent thrombosis.. In the modified intent-to-treat population, 2,059 patients (18.8%) received bivalirudin, with 1,014 patients in the cangrelor treatment arm and 1,045 in the clopidogrel treatment arm.. At 48 h, the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis was lower with cangrelor versus clopidogrel (48 [4.7%] vs. 70 [6.7%]; odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, p = 0.047). Death was similar in both arms (2 [0.2%] vs. 2 [0.2%]). Myocardial infarction was reduced by cangrelor (37 [3.6%] vs. 59 [5.6%]; OR: 0.63, p = 0.03), as was death/myocardial infarction (39 [3.8%] vs. 61 [5.8%]; OR: 0.65, p = 0.04). Cangrelor was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward less stent thrombosis (7 [0.7%] vs. 15 [1.4%]; OR: 0.48, p = 0.10), which was evident within 2 h after percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.057). GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries) severe bleeding was similar in both arms (2 of 1,021 [0.2%] vs. 2 of 1,055 [0.2%]) as were other bleeding definitions and transfusions. Efficacy and safety results were consistent in patients with stable angina, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (p for interaction: 0.62 and 0.29).. Cangrelor may offer an attractive benefit risk profile when used in combination with bivalirudin.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Anticoagulants; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Hirudins; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

VA-ECMO is commonly used for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory cardiac arrest (CA) undergoing PCI for ACS. In this setting at high risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, optimal anti-thrombotic therapy remains ill-defined. We hypothesized that an anti-thrombotic therapy comprising a parenteral anticoagulant (bivalirudin) and a parenteral anti-platelet agent (cangrelor) may prove safe and effective in this scenario. From November 2019 to December 2021, 14 patients received at least one dose of cangrelor (starting dose: 0.125 μg/kg/min) plus bivalirudin, without background aspirin, in the context of PCI and VA-ECMO for ACS-related CS/CA, and were included in this study. Efficacy endpoint was occurrence of thrombotic events and safety endpoint was major bleeding occurrence. Median age was 58 years. The majority (64%) presented with refractory CA. A thrombotic event occurred in 14%, while major bleeding occurred in 21% patients. One patient experienced arterial thrombosis after VA-ECMO arterial cannula removal, another experienced ischemic cerebellar stroke without functional sequelae. Bleeding events were: 29% BARC 3a, 14% BARC 3b, and 7% BARC 5b. Overall in-hospital mortality was 50%. Cangrelor was continued for 5 (4-10) days; temporary discontinuation was necessary in 36%, either for VA-ECMO cannula removal or for bleeding events. A low dose of cangrelor, associated with standard-intensity anticoagulation with bivalirudin was a feasible anti-thrombotic strategy in patients undergoing PCI during VA-ECMO support for ACS-related CS/CA. Bleeding events rates outweighed thrombotic events rates in this critically-ill population, although the observed rates were lowest among available studies.

Topics: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Shock, Cardiogenic; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Platelets are activated in vivo by multiple agonists; however, platelet function testing in vitro has been performed predominantly with only one or two agonists of platelet activation. Greater insight into anticipated effects of antithrombotic regimens should enhance the design of successful clinical trials. To test this concept, we assessed platelet activation induced by multiple agonists and two antithrombotic regimens, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and eptifibatide compared with bivalirudin and cangrelor. Blood samples from 10 patients with coronary artery disease were spiked with pharmacologic concentrations achieved in vivo of either UFH (1.2 U/ml) and eptifibatide (1.7 microg/ml), or with bivalirudin (8 microg/ml) and cangrelor (500 nmol/l). Platelet function was assessed with the use of flow cytometry. Agonists included thrombin (50 nmol/l), adenosine diphosphate (1 micromol/l), the collagen-mimetic convulxin (5 ng/ml), and platelet-activating factor (10 nmol/l). When platelet activation was identified by the surface expression of P-selectin in response to multiple agonists, the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed activation more than UFH and eptifibatide. When platelet activation was identified by the activation of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (PAC-1 binding), the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor was more effective in suppressing activation in response to thrombin and adenosine diphosphate, whereas UFH and eptifibatide more effectively prevented binding of PAC-1 when platelets were activated with the collagen-mimetic convulxin. In conclusion, bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed platelet activation in response to diverse agonists in vitro more than UFH and eptifibatide. These results and this approach to selection of promising interventions should be helpful in streamlining the design of clinical trials.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Monophosphate; Animals; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Crotalid Venoms; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eptifibatide; Fibrinolytic Agents; Flow Cytometry; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Lectins, C-Type; P-Selectin; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Pilot Projects; Platelet Activating Factor; Platelet Activation; Platelet Function Tests; Recombinant Proteins; Research Design; Thrombin