biapigenin and hyperforin

The example of St. John's wort offers convincing evidence for the concept that modern methods of pharmacological and phytochemical research are effective in advancing the development of traditional herbal remedies. As a consequence of these efforts, it is known today that several compounds from different structural groups and with different mechanisms of action seem to be responsible for the observed antidepressant efficacy of St. John's Wort. Co-effectors in the extract improve the bioavailability of active constituents such as hypericin (1) (pharmacokinetic synergy). Unwanted side effects are preventable without remarkable loss of activity when the responsible constituent(s) are carefully removed during the extraction process, as demonstrated for hyperforin (3), which is responsible for the induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-metabolizing enzymes (CYP3A4, in particular). On the basis of our findings, it is likely that positive interactions between single compounds occur more frequently in traditionally used herbal preparations than is known presently.

Topics: Anthracenes; Antidepressive Agents; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hypericum; Molecular Structure; Perylene; Phloroglucinol; Plant Preparations; Plants, Medicinal; Terpenes

A quantitative near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) method was established for the determination of two major constituents (hyperforin and I3,II8-biapigenin) in St. John's wort extracts. Hyperforin was chosen due to the fact that it is found in a concentration range from 1 to 5%, a common one for NIRS determinations. I3,II8-Biapigenin on the other hand was selected as a constituent with very low concentrations (0.1-0.7%) but an extensive chromophore that allows very precise measurements in the ultraviolet (UV) and thus exact reference values that are vital for proper NIRS calibrations. Reference measurements were performed by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), determining the constituents' content in 35 pharmaceutical dry extracts of different origins. The reference method was validated according to the ICH guideline Q2B. Using partial-least squares (PLS) regression a multivariate calibration was done for the two ingredients each (PLS1). Satisfactory calibration statistics were obtained for hyperforin with a root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) of 0.17 and a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.22 at a concentration range from 1 to 6% in the dry extracts. Due to the very low concentrations of I3,II8-biapigenin the accuracy of prediction is somewhat lower. However, it is possible to obtain very good results and reliable prediction by dividing the concentration range at 0.35%. The study emphasizes the potential of NIRS as a rapid and highly effective alternative method to conventional quantitative analysis of plant extracts.

Topics: Apigenin; Biflavonoids; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds; Calibration; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Flavonoids; Hypericum; Multivariate Analysis; Phloroglucinol; Plant Extracts; Reference Standards; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared; Terpenes

Interactions between neurotransmitter receptors involved in the pathophysiology of depression, anxiety and ethanol consumption and two extracts (hydromethanolic and lipophilic extracts obtained with hypercritical CO2) from Hypericum Perforatum L or St. John's wort (SJW) and three constituents (hyperforin, hypericin and biapigenin) were evaluated by in vitro binding assays. The two extracts, tested at 10 microg/ml, did not inhibit ligand binding at the following receptors: serotonin 5-HT6 and 5-HT7, benzodiazepine, sigma and neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 and Y2 receptors. The hydromethanolic extract, but not the lipophilic extract, interacted with GABA(A) receptors (IC50 5.5 microg/ml), while both interacted with the dopamine (DA) transporters, albeit with high IC50 values (24.5 and 12.9 microg/ml, respectively). Biapigenin (1 microg/ml, 2 microM) inhibited ligand binding at benzodiazepine receptors only (IC50: 2 microM). Hyperforin (1 microg/ml, 2 microM) only inhibited [3H]WIN-35,428 binding to DA transporters, although the IC50 (5 microM) was higher than the IC50 found for inhibition of the synaptosomal DA reuptake (0.8 microM). This finding extended the same observation previously described for the 5-HTergic system to the DAergic system, confirming that the inhibition of monoamine reuptake is due to a different mechanism than that of synthetic antidepressants. Hypericin showed micromolar affinities for both NPY-Y1 and Y2 receptors and for sigma receptors (IC50 3-4 microM). These hypericin activities might be of interest because NPY and sigma receptors have been associated with anxiety disorders, depressive illnesses and ethanol consumption. However, they were present at relatively high hypericin concentrations, and were also light-dependent (i.e. the IC50 values increased when binding assays were carried out in the dark). Thus, our in vitro binding results may suggest that either the pharmacological effects of SJW are due to other molecules than hypericin or hyperforin (other constituents or active metabolites), or that the mechanism of action is different from those that have been considered up to now.

Topics: Animals; Anthracenes; Antidepressive Agents; Apigenin; Biflavonoids; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Flavonoids; Hypericum; In Vitro Techniques; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Transport Proteins; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Perylene; Phloroglucinol; Plant Extracts; Radioligand Assay; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, GABA-A; Receptors, Neuropeptide Y; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, sigma; Terpenes