betadex has been researched along with tulobuterol* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for betadex and tulobuterol
Article | Year |
---|---|
In situ immobilization of sulfated-β-cyclodextrin as stationary phase for capillary electrochromatography enantioseparation.
In this work, a novel sulfated-β-cyclodextrin (S-β-CD) coated stationary phase was prepared for open-tubular capillary electrochromatography (OT-CEC). The capillary was developed by attaching polydopamine/sulfated-β-cyclodextrin (PDA/S-β-CD) onto the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) coated capillary which was pretreated with polydopamine. The results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis spectroscopy (EDS) indicated that polydopamine/sulfated-β-cyclodextrin was successfully fixed on the gold nanoparticles coated capillary. To evaluate the performance of the prepared open tubular (OT) column, the enantioseparation was carried out by using ten chiral drugs as model analytes. Under the optimal conditions, salbutamol, terbutaline, trantinterol, tulobuterol, clorprenaline, pheniramine, chlorpheniramine, brompheniramine, isoprenaline and tolterodine were baseline separated with the resolution (Rs) values of 3.25, 1.76, 2.51, 1.89, 3.17, 2.17, 1.99, 1.72, 2.01 and 3.20, respectively. Repeatability of the column was studied, with the relative standard deviations for run-to-run, day-to-day and column-to-column lower than 5.7%. Topics: Albuterol; beta-Cyclodextrins; Brompheniramine; Capillary Electrochromatography; Chlorpheniramine; Clenbuterol; Isoproterenol; Particle Size; Pheniramine; Surface Properties; Terbutaline; Tolterodine Tartrate | 2019 |
Quantitative determination of clenbuterol, salbutamol and tulobuterol enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis.
Enantiomers of clenbuterol, salbutamol and tulobuterol were directly separated and quantitated from a spiked sample by capillary electrophoresis (CE) using sulfaited beta-cyclodextrin (SCD) as chiral selector and phosphate as running buffer. The SCD and buffer concentration, pH and field strength were the parameters studied to optimize the separation. Optimal separation was obtained using 50 mM of phosphate monobasic at pH = 2.24, 0.25% (w/w) of sulfated cyclodextrin and a field strength of 10 kV, with 20 min total time analysis. Comparison between two different injection modes (hydrodynamic and electrokinetic) was made. In the hydrodynamic mode, repeatability (expressed as relative standard deviation, RSD) was less than 1.2% for migration times for all the analyte peaks and less than 2% for peak area percentages. With respect to reproducibility, RSD was less than 3.8% for migration time and less than 3% for peak area percentages. Calibration curves were set up for two different sample concentration ranges (1 to 10 microg mL(-1) and 160-800 ng mL(-1), of each of the racemates studied). Although the electrokinetic injection mode for an aqueous sample appeared to suffer from some enantiodiscrimination, calibration curves were linear in the range between 1 and 10 ng mL(-1) with regression coefficients ranging from 0.9996 to 0.9952. As in the case of hydrodynamic injection, the method was tested with a spiked sample. Topics: Albuterol; beta-Cyclodextrins; Bronchodilator Agents; Buffers; Clenbuterol; Cyclodextrins; Electrophoresis, Capillary; Indicators and Reagents; Molecular Structure; Reproducibility of Results; Stereoisomerism; Terbutaline | 2001 |