betadex and octanoic-acid

The molecular dynamics of spin-labeled compounds included into the solid phase of cyclodextrins (CDs) has been studied using conventional (X-band) ESR at 9 GHz and high-field high-frequency (HFHF) ESR at 240 and 170 GHz. The patterns of axial rotation at these higher frequencies are clear just by inspection of the spectrum, unlike the case for 9 GHz spectra. That is HFHF ESR is sensitive to molecular motion about the diffusion axis collinear with the X, Y or Z-direction of the magnetic g- and A-tensors of the nitroxide moiety (referred to, respectively, as X, Y or Z-rotation). For doxyl stearic acids (Z-rotation) and TEMPOyl caprylate (X-rotation) included in beta- and gamma-CDs we were able to determine the rate of molecular motion and the corresponding potential barriers. We emphasize that determining the rate of Z-rotation by ESR is feasible only using HFHF ESR. For the X-rotation case we suggest that the motion of the nitroxide moiety consists of fast small-angle librations about the magnetic X-axis superimposed by rotational diffusion about the same axis. The potential barrier of 1.7 Kcal mol(-1) for this rotational diffusion is unusually low. A fascinating feature of TEMPO derivatives included in beta-CD is the detectable molecular motion at temperatures below 77 K. For the other CD-spin probe systems, we used multifrequency analysis to assign the conformations of spin-labeled molecules. A dramatic spectral change for 16-sasl in beta- and gamma-CDs at approximately 260 K corresponds to a tilting of the position of the nitroxide moiety on the rotating molecule relative to the long diffusion axis, while for TEMPO derivatives in gamma-cyclodextrin below 200 K, we observe a rapid transition from fast to very slow rotational motion. More complex features are best studied by means of multifrequency ESR experiments. The visual clarity and the simplicity of analysis of the ESR spectra shown in this work should provide a benchmark for future studies of molecular motion by HFHF ESR.

Topics: beta-Cyclodextrins; Caprylates; Cyclic N-Oxides; Cyclodextrins; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy; Fatty Acids; gamma-Cyclodextrins; Models, Molecular; Palmitic Acids; Spin Labels; Stearic Acids; Temperature

This study investigates the role of lipid rafts and caveolae, a subclass of lipid raft microdomains, in the binding and uptake of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) by 3T3-L1 cells during differentiation. Disruption of lipid rafts by beta-cyclodextrin (betaCD) or selective inhibition of caveolae by overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of caveolin-3 (Cav(DGV)) resulted in disassembly of caveolae structures at the cell surface, as assessed by electron microscopy. While in 3T3-L1 fibroblasts, which express few caveolae, Cav(DGV) or betaCD had no effect on LCFA uptake, in 3T3-L1 adipocytes the same treatments decreased the level of [(3)H]oleic acid uptake by up to 55 +/- 8 and 49 +/- 7%, respectively. In contrast, cholesterol loading of 3T3-L1 adipocytes resulted in a 4-fold increase in the extent of caveolin-1 expression and a 1.7-fold increase in the level of LCFA uptake. Both the inhibitory and enhancing effects of these treatments were constantly increasing with the [(3)H]oleic acid incubation time up to 5 min. Incubation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with [(3)H]stearate followed by isolation of a caveolin-1 positive detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) fraction revealed that [(3)H]stearate binds to caveolae. Fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) was found to be present in this DRM fraction as well. Our data thus strongly indicate a critical involvement of lipid rafts in the binding and uptake of LCFA into 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Furthermore, our findings suggest that caveolae play a pivotal role in lipid raft-dependent LCFA uptake. This transport mechanism is induced in conjunction with cell differentiation and might be mediated by FAT/CD36.

Topics: 3T3-L1 Cells; Adipocytes; Animals; beta-Cyclodextrins; Binding Sites; Caprylates; Caveolae; Caveolin 3; Caveolins; CD36 Antigens; Cholesterol; Cholic Acids; Cyclodextrins; Detergents; Fatty Acids; Membrane Microdomains; Mice; Oleic Acid; Stearic Acids