benzofurans and regorafenib

Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of three agents by a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.. We included phase III randomized controlled trials in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov registry from initiation until January 2019. Data from randomized controlled trials including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted. Direct meta-analysis and indirect meta-analysis using network meta-analysis were assessed.. Five trials comprising a total of 2586 patients were included. For efficacy analysis of OS, no statistically significant differences were observed between regorafenib and TAS-102 (HR 0.945, 95% CI [0.677, 1.320], P = 0.753), regorafenib and fruquintinib (HR 1.056, 95% CI [0.690, 1.621], P = 0.814), or TAS-102 and fruquintinib (HR 1.117, 95% CI [0.740, 1.685], P = 0.610). However, fruquintinib was superior in PFS compared with TAS-102 (HR 1.756, 95% CI [1.079, 2.857], P = 0.023). Regorafenib and TAS-102 appeared to have a similar effect on PFS (HR 0.907, 95% CI [0.611, 1.346], P = 0.641), as did regorafenib and fruquintinib (HR 1.592, 95% CI [0.968, 2.618], P = 0.067). None of the three agents were better in terms of all grade AEs or any grade of 3-5 AEs. However, subgroup analysis of AEs exhibited different toxicity profiles between the three drugs.. Indirect comparison suggested that the three agents had similar OS but that fruquintinib was superior in terms of PFS compared with that of TAS-102. These three agents had different toxicity profiles.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Network Meta-Analysis; Phenylurea Compounds; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thymine; Time Factors; Trifluridine; Uracil

BACKGROUND This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify key randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), followed by network meta-analysis, to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of regorafenib, fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Systematic literature review was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library online databases to identify published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the odds ratios (ORs) for the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and fatal adverse events (FAEs) were compared indirectly using network meta-analysis based on a random-effects model. RESULTS Five RCTs that included 2,604 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Indirect comparisons showed that fruquintinib was associated with significant superiority for PFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95) and DCR (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.08-3.01) when compared with TAS-102 in patients with mCRC. However, there was no significant difference between OS or ORR between regorafenib, fruquintinib, and TAS-102. Fruquintinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of SAEs when compared with TAS-102 or regorafenib. There was no significant difference in the risk of AEs or FAEs following indirect comparison between fruquintinib, regorafenib, and TAS-102. CONCLUSIONS The findings from network meta-analysis showed that fruquintinib was associated with significant superiority for PFS and DCR compared with TAS-102, but fruquintinib was associated with significantly increased risk for SAEs compared with regorafenib and TAS-102.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzofurans; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Rectal Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil

The optimal treatment in the third-line and later-line setting for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been established. As reported, regorafenib and fruquintinib have shown to be superior to placebo in mCRC. However, no direct clinical comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib has been conducted; we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and fruquintinib.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib versus placebo for patients with mCRC were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. After that, we performed pairwise direct meta-analyses (regorafenib vs. placebo and fruquintinib vs. placebo) and indirect comparison (regorafenib vs. fruquintinib) using network meta-analyses methods.. Three RCTs involving 1380 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the direct meta-analysis, regorafenib and fruquintinib both showed survival benefits when compared with placebo. For the indirect comparison, fruquintinib shows no significant difference in OS compared to regorafenib (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.46). Regarding PFS, there was a tendency that fruquintinib was superior to regorafenib (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.39-1.08); however, there was no statistic difference. For the safety analysis, in indirect comparison, fruquintinib showed significant difference in all-grade toxicity compared to regorafenib (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82), especially in subgroup of proteinuria (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.86). For the grade 3-5 toxicity, fruquintinib showed no significant difference when compared with regorafenib (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.64-1.32).. Based on efficacy and safety, there was a tendency that fruquintinib was superior to regorafenib, as a whole, regorafenib and fruquintinib demonstrated similar clinical benefit for patients with refractory mCRC. It seems that fruquintinib has less toxic in all-grade toxicity when compared with regorafenib.

Topics: Benzofurans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Network Meta-Analysis; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Treatment Outcome

Regorafenib and fruquintinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are recommended for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) in China. However, to date, no head-to-head trials have been conducted to guide clinical practice.. An ambispective observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Cancer Hospital. Patients with metastatic CRC who received regorafenib or fruquintinib were retrospectively collected between January 2018 and April 2020, and prospectively enrolled between May 2020 and February 2021. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. An additional goal of the study was to explore the appropriate sequence of regorafenib and fruquintinib treatment.. A total of 366 patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled to receive regorafenib (n = 260) or fruquintinib (n = 106) between January 2018 and February 2021. No difference was observed for median TTF (regorafenib 2.7 months vs. fruquintinib 3.1 months, P = .200) or median OS (regorafenib 13.8 months vs. fruquintinib 11.3 months, P = .527). The propensity score analysis showed similar results for median TTF and median OS between the 2 groups, as did the results of subgroup analysis for prospective set (n = 146). For sequence analysis, patients with regorafenib followed by fruquintinib (n = 84) showed longer OS than that with the reverse (n = 29) (28.1 months vs. 18.4 months, P = .024). Most patients tolerated regorafenib at a reduced dose (93.1%), and most patients tolerated fruquintinib at a standard dose (68.9%). The incidences of most adverse events were similar between the two groups, while any grade of hand-foot skin reaction and hyperbilirubinemia were more frequently observed in the regorafenib group and ≥grade 3 hypertension was more common in the fruquintinib group.. Regorafenib and fruquintinib had similar efficacy and toxicity profiles with various frequency. Regorafenib followed by fruquintinib showed longer OS than the reverse, but the sequence needs to be further confirmed.

Topics: Benzofurans; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies

This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib combined with camrelizumab in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) and/or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Medical records of MSS/pMMR mCRC patients who received regorafenib (80 mg) or fruquintinib (3 mg) once a day (21 days on/7 days off) plus camrelizumab (200 mg) every three weeks in Yuhuangding Hospital between January 2020 and June 2020 were retrospectively collected. Follow-up data up to November 1st, 2020 was gathered. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The safety profile was the secondary endpoint. A total of 16 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 25.0% (4/16) and the DCR was 62.5% (10/16). The main adverse events (AEs) included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (81.3%), fatigue (43.8%), hypertension (37.5%), hand-foot skin reaction (25.0%), and thyroid dysfunction (25.0%). Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with only 1 patient of grade 3 liver dysfunction. All the AEs were ameliorated by effective symptomatic treatment. Regorafenib or fruquintinib plus camrelizumab exhibited promising efficacy in patients with MSS/pMMR mCRC. The toxicity was moderate and manageable.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzofurans; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Mismatch Repair; Humans; Microsatellite Repeats; Phenylurea Compounds; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Retrospective Studies

The clinical efficiency and adverse reactions of anlotinib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as a third-line treatment compared with chemotherapy and regorafenib or fruquintinib was explored in this study. Clinical data from 105 mCRC patients who failed at least two lines of chemotherapy were collected. The patients were divided into three groups based on their third-line therapeutic regimen: third-line chemotherapy only (group A); anlotinib (group B); and fruquintinib or regorafenib (group C). The result showed that the ORR and DCR of group B (14.29%, 85.71%) were higher than those of group A (0%, 40.00%). The ORRs of group B and group C were 14.29% and 20.00%, respectively. Group B and group C had the same DCR, 85.71%. The mean PFS values of group B (3.46 months) and group C (3.33 months) were longer than that of group A (2.25 months) (χ2=84.255, p<0.001) and the mean PFS values of group B and group C were similar (χ2=0.884, p=0.347). The mean OS of group B was 9.22 months, which was longer than that of group A (6.95 months) (χ2=38.837, p<0.001). The mean OS values of group B (9.22 months) and group C (9.38 months) were not significantly different (χ2=0.456, p=0.499). The incidences of proteinuria, hand-foot skin reaction, myelosuppression, and gastrointestinal reaction were similar between group B and group C (p=0.173, 0.188, 1.00, 0.154, respectively). Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reaction were more common in group A than in group B and group C (p<0.001). For mCRC, anlotinib as a third-line treatment is better than chemotherapy and similar to regorafenib or fruquintinib. The associated adverse reactions are tolerable.

Topics: Benzofurans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Indoles; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Quinolines