azilsartan and olmesartan

The comparison of antihypertensive effects between azilsartan and olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension has been investigated in several studies. The results were not consistent. We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan versus olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension.. Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched for all published randomized studies comparing the antihypertensive effects between azilsartan and olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension.. The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 1402 patients included in five trials. The reduction of office systolic blood pressure treated with azilsartan was greater than olmesartan (weighted mean differences (WMD) - 2.15 (95% confidence interval (CI), - 3.78, - 0.53) mm Hg, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in reduction of office diastolic blood pressure between azilsartan and olmesartan (WMD - 0.99 (95% CI, - 2.06, 0.08) mm Hg, p > 0.05). The reduction of office systolic blood pressure treated with azilsartan was greater than olmesartan at same dose for both drugs (WMD - 2.24 (95% CI, - 4.03, - 0.44) mm Hg, p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in reduction of office diastolic blood pressure between azilsartan and olmesartan (WMD - 0.55 (95% CI, - 1.76, 0.66) mm Hg, p > 0.05).. This meta-analysis provides the evidence that the reduction of office systolic blood pressure treated with azilsartan was greater than olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension. These findings suggest the importance of strict designed randomized controlled trials in determining antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers in clinical practice.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Imidazoles; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Early phase studies of novel interventions for hypertension, such as renal sympathetic denervation, are sometimes single-armed (uncontrolled). We explored the wisdom of this by quantifying the blood pressure fall in the placebo arms of contemporary trials of hypertension. We searched Medline up to June 2014 and identified blinded, randomized trials of hypertension therapy in which the control arm received placebo medication or a sham (placebo) procedure. For nonresistant hypertension, we have identified all such trials of drugs licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2000 (5 drugs). This US Food and Drug Administration-related restriction was not applied to resistant hypertension trials. This produced 7451 patients, who were allocated to a blinded control from 52 trials of nonresistant hypertension and 694 patients from 8 trials of resistant hypertension (3 drugs and 2 interventions). Systolic blood pressure fell by 5.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 5.14-6.71; P<0.0001) in the nonresistant cohort and by 8.76 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 4.83-12.70; P<0.0001) in the resistant cohort. Using metaregression, the falls were larger in trials that did not use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as an inclusion criterion (z=2.84; P=0.0045), in those with higher baseline blood pressures (z=-0.3; P=0.0001), and in those where the patients were prescribed a continuous background of antihypertensives (z=-2.72; P=0.0065). The nontrivial magnitude of these apparent blood pressure reductions with perfectly ineffective intervention (placebo) illustrates that efficacy explorations of novel therapies for hypertension, once safety is established, should be performed with a randomized, appropriately controlled, and blinded design.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzopyrans; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Control Groups; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Eplerenone; Ethanolamines; Fumarates; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Kidney; Nebivolol; Oxadiazoles; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Research Design; Spironolactone; Sympathectomy; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

In the last few years, a number of important clinical trials have been completed that have investigated the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. New drugs, focusing on this system, have now emerged as a result.. The authors review the most relevant information available, reported from the last 5 years, pertaining to the most important clinical trials on renin-angiotensin system blockers (ARBs). The authors' data review includes the trials of aliskiren, telmisartan, olmesartan and azilsartan. The authors also review the possible risk of cancer with ARBs.. The results of ASPIRE and ALTITUDE trials strongly suggested that dual inhibition of aliskiren with either ARBS or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) should be avoided. Olmesartan is an effective and safe antihypertensive agent, but special attention should be paid to high-risk patients, such as those with coronary disease, to avoid an excessive reduction in blood pressure. The authors also note that while azilsartan is probably the most potent ARB, there is still a lack of data regarding potential organ damage and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Lastly, recent evidence has shown a lack of a relationship between ARB therapy and the occurrence of cancer.

Topics: Amides; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation; Fumarates; Humans; Imidazoles; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Neoplasms; Oxadiazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Factors; Telmisartan; Tetrazoles

Many patients still have high blood pressure (BP) after treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Essential Hypertension; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Male; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Olmesartan and azilsartan, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), are expected to decrease blood pressure more than the other ARBs. We conducted randomized-controlled trials to compare the practical efficacy of olmesartan with azilsartan.. Eighty-four patients treated with the conventional ARBs for more than 3 months were assigned randomly to receive either 20 mg of olmesartan (olmesartan medoxomil, OL group) or 20 mg of azilsartan (azilsartan, not azilsartan medoxomil, AZ group) once daily for 16 weeks. The practical efficacy on blood pressure was compared between the OL and AZ groups.. Office blood pressure of both groups decreased significantly (OL group: 152/86-141/79 mmHg, P<0.05, AZ group: 149/83-135/75 mmHg; P<0.05). Diastolic home blood pressure in the AZ group decreased significantly (79±9-74±7 mmHg; P<0.05), but not in the OL group (79±11-75±10 mmHg; P=0.068). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. The dosage of olmesartan and azilsartan increased significantly and slightly for 16 weeks (OL group: 20.3-23.1 mg; P<0.05, AZ group: 20.5-23.2 mg; P<0.05), without a significant difference between groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in renal function, lipid profiles, brain natriuretic peptide, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, and urinary L-type fatty acid-binding protein between the two groups.. Both olmesartan and azilsartan equally reduced blood pressures. Both olmesartan and azilsartan showed a renoprotective effect and were well tolerated without any major adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been widely used to treat hypertension and large-scale clinical studies have shown various benefits. In this study, we compared olmesartan with azilsartan, the newest ARB.. The subjects were outpatients who were clinically stable after cardiac surgery. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either azilsartan or olmesartan for 1 year and were switched to the other drug for the following 1 year. The primary endpoints were the levels of plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone.. Home blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and additional antihypertensive medication was administered to 12 patients (20 episodes) in the azilsartan group versus 4 patients (4 episodes) in the olmesartan group, with the number being significantly higher in the azilsartan group. After 1 year of treatment, both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Left ventricular mass index was also significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group.. This study showed that olmesartan reduces angiotensin II and aldosterone levels more effectively than azilsartan. Accordingly, it may be effective in patients with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity after cardiac surgery or patients with severe cardiac hypertrophy.

Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Substitution; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Imidazoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Remodeling

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chlorthalidone; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Olmesartan Medoxomil; Oxadiazoles; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Tetrazoles

The increasing popularity of noninferiority trials reflects the ongoing efforts to replace existing treatments (reference treatments) with new treatments (experimental treatments) that retain a substantial fraction of the effect of the reference treatments. The adoption of any new treatment has to be vindicated by a demonstration of benefits that outweigh a possible clinically insignificant reduction in the reference treatment efficacy. Statistical methods have been developed to analyze data collected from noninferiority trials. However, these methods focus on cases with only one reference treatment. In this paper, we provide the statistical inferential procedures for situations with multiple reference treatments. The computation of the corresponding critical values for simultaneous testings of noninferiority of several new treatments to multiple reference treatments in the presence of a placebo is provided. Furthermore, for a prespecified level of test power, a technique to determine the optimal sample size before the onset of a noninferiority trial is derived. A clinical example is given to illustrate our proposed procedure.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Oxadiazoles; Reference Standards; Research Design; Sample Size; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

We aimed to examine the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect and the time to attain the maximal antihypertensive effect (stabilization time) of several angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) based on home BP measurements.. We surveyed consecutive newly diagnosed, untreated patients with hypertension who started the treatment with a mid-level dose of one of seven ARBs (losartan 50 mg, telmisartan 40 mg, candesartan 8 mg, olmesartan 20 mg, valsartan 80 mg, irbesartan 100 mg, or azilsartan 20 mg). All study participants measured home BP in the morning for at least 1 week during an untreated period and 4 weeks during the treatment period.. Age, the proportion of men, and baseline home BP levels did not differ significantly between groups (total n = 232; age, 62.2 years; 50.9% men; home SBP/DBP, 151.6/90.0 mmHg). Significant differences in the BP-lowering effect and the stabilization time between ARBs were observed (P ≤ 0.02). The extent of BP-lowering effects of azilsartan 20 mg was significantly greater than that of valsartan 80 mg or irbesartan 100 mg (15.3 vs. 7.9 or 8.2 mmHg, respectively P ≤ 0.03). The stabilization time of losartan for home SBP was significantly longer than that of valsartan, irbesartan, or azilsartan (22.8 vs. 7.1, 4.7, or 7.1 days, respectively, P ≤ 0.01).. The maximum effect and the stabilization time differed among ARBs used at the mid-level dose in Japan. An ARB should be chosen based on its desired characteristics.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Irbesartan; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Self Care; Telmisartan; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Valsartan

The possible counteracting effect of angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE)2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas axis against the ACE/Ang II/Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor axis in blood pressure control has been previously described. We examined the possibility that this pathway might be involved in the anti-hypertensive effect of a newly developed AT1 receptor blocker (ARB), azilsartan, and compared azilsartan's effects with those of another ARB, olmesartan. Transgenic mice carrying the human renin and angiotensinogen genes (hRN/hANG-Tg) were given azilsartan or olmesartan. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as determined by radiotelemetry, were significantly higher in hRN/hANG-Tg mice than in wild-type (WT) mice. Treatment with azilsartan or olmesartan (1 or 5 mg kg(-1) per day) significantly decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and the blood pressure-lowering effect of azilsartan was more marked than that of olmesartan. The urinary Na concentration decreased in an age-dependent manner in hRN/hANG-Tg mice. Administration of azilsartan or olmesartan increased urinary Na concentration, and this effect was weaker with olmesartan than with azilsartan. Azilsartan decreased ENaC-α mRNA expression in the kidney and decreased the ratio of heart to body weight. Olmesartan had a similar but less-marked effect. ACE2 mRNA expression was lower in the kidneys and hearts of hRN/hANG-Tg mice than in WT mice. This decrease in ACE2 mRNA expression was attenuated by azilsartan, but not by olmesartan. These results suggest that the hypotensive and anti-hypertrophic effects of azilsartan may involve activation of the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas axis with AT1 receptor blockade.

Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Cardiomegaly; Epithelial Sodium Channels; Imidazoles; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Oxadiazoles; Peptide Fragments; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Sodium; Tetrazoles