azadirachtin and flonicamid

azadirachtin has been researched along with flonicamid* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for azadirachtin and flonicamid

ArticleYear
Non-target effects of commonly used plant protection products in roses on the predatory mite Euseius gallicus Kreiter & Tixier (Acari: Phytoseidae).
    Pest management science, 2016, Volume: 72, Issue:7

    Euseius gallicus Kreiter & Tixier (Acari: Phytoseidae) is a predatory mite recently available for use against various pests in roses. We tested in greenhouse trials the impact on the numbers of eggs and motiles of E. gallicus of the most commonly used plant protection products in roses in northern Europe: the acaricides acequinocyl and etoxazole, the insecticides azadirachtin-A, acetamiprid, flonicamid, imidacloprid, indoxacarb, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam and the fungicides boscalid and kresoxim-methyl, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, dodemorph and fluopyram + tebuconazole.. The neonicotinoids thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid and imidacloprid had a negative impact on the number of eggs (47, 62, 81 and 76% reduction, respectively, compared with a water treatment) and number of motiles of E. gallicus (42.2, 42.9, 59.9 and 60.6% reduction) and were classified as slightly to moderately toxic. Also, the number of motiles was reduced after treatment with acequinocyl (47%) and etoxazole (43.9%) and after two treatments with flonicamid (41%) with a 1 week interval between treatments.. Azadirachtin-A, acetamiprid, flonicamid, boscalid and kresoxim-methyl, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, dodemorph and fluopyram + tebuconazole were harmless for E. gallicus. Special attention should be paid to the impact of neonicotinoids and of acequinocyl and etoxazole, and to the application frequency with flonicamid on E. gallicus. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.

    Topics: Acaricides; Acetates; Animals; Fungicides, Industrial; Imidazoles; Limonins; Mites; Naphthalenes; Neonicotinoids; Niacinamide; Nitro Compounds; Oxazines; Oxazoles; Pyridines; Rosa; Thiamethoxam; Thiazines; Thiazoles

2016
Evaluation of the susceptibility of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, to a selection of novel biorational insecticides using an artificial diet.
    Journal of insect science (Online), 2009, Volume: 9

    An improved technique was developed to assay the toxicity of insecticides against aphids using an artificial diet. The susceptibility of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) was determined for a selection of novel biorational insecticides, each representing a novel mode of action. Flonicamid, a novel systemic insecticide with selective activity as feeding blocker against sucking insects, showed high toxicity against first-instar A. pisum nymphs with an LC(50) of 20.4 microg/ml after 24 h, and of 0.24 microg/ml after 72 h. The toxicity was compared with another feeding blocker, pymetrozine, and the neonicotinoid, imidacloprid. In addition, four insect growth regulators were tested. The chitin synthesis inhibitor flufenoxuron, the juvenile hormone analogue pyriproxyfen, and the azadirachtin compound Neem Azal-T/S showed strong effects and reduced the aphid population by 50% after 3 days of treatment at a concentration of 7-9 microg/ml. The ecdysone agonist tested, halofenozide, was less potent. In conclusion, the improved aphid feeding apparatus can be useful as a miniature screening device for insecticides against different aphid pests. The present study demonstrated rapid and strong toxicity of flonicamid, and other biorational insecticides towards A. pisum.

    Topics: Animals; Aphids; Diet; Feeding Behavior; Imidazoles; Insect Control; Insecticides; Juvenile Hormones; Lethal Dose 50; Limonins; Neonicotinoids; Niacinamide; Nitro Compounds; Nymph; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Triazines

2009