aluminum-tetrasulfophthalocyanine has been researched along with phytochlorin* in 4 studies
1 review(s) available for aluminum-tetrasulfophthalocyanine and phytochlorin
Article | Year |
---|---|
Photodynamic treatment outcomes of potentially-malignant lesions and malignancies of the head and neck region: A systematic review.
The aim of the present study was to systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of oral potentially-malignant disorders (PMDS) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).. From 1985 to 2015, PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched using different combinations of the following key words: PDT, oral precancer, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, erythroleukoplakia, verrucous hyperplasia, oral submucous fibrosis, and HNSCC. Review articles, experimental studies, case reports, commentaries, letters to the editor, unpublished articles, and articles published in languages other than English were excluded.. Twenty-six studies were included in the present study. The number of patients ranged from 2 to 147, with a mean age of 50-67 years. The reported numbers of PMDS and HNSCC ranged between 5 and 225. Photosensitizers used were aminolevulinic acid, meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin, Foscan, hematoporphyrin derivatives, Photofrin, Photosan, and chlorine-e6. Laser wavelength, power density, irradiation duration were 585-652 nm, 50-500 mW/cm. PDT is effective in the management of PMDS and HNSCC. Topics: Aminolevulinic Acid; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chlorophyllides; Databases, Factual; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Erythroplasia; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hematoporphyrins; Humans; Hyperplasia; Indoles; Laser Therapy; Lasers; Leukoplakia; Leukoplakia, Oral; Mesoporphyrins; Oral Submucous Fibrosis; Organometallic Compounds; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Treatment Outcome | 2018 |
3 other study(ies) available for aluminum-tetrasulfophthalocyanine and phytochlorin
Article | Year |
---|---|
Enhancement of photodynamic tumor therapy effectiveness by electroporation in vitro.
The aim of our study was to determine if electroporation could improve the efficacy of photodynamic tumor therapy. A disadvantage of photodynamic therapy is a slow and in some cases insufficient accumulation of photosensitizer in tumor tissue, which could restrict the achievement of an efficient dose. Under the action of electric pulses, cells undergo membrane electroporation, which results in an increased permeability to various exogenous molecules. In this study, murine hepatoma MH22A cells were exposed to light in vitro in the presence of a photosensitizer, either chlorin e6 or aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate, following electroporation. Accumulation of the photosensitizers was registered by fluorescence microscopy. Cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. Our results demonstrate that electroporation improves an access of chlorin e6 and aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate to MH22A cells. Electroporation in combination with photosensitization significantly reduces viability of the treated cells even at low doses of photosensitizers. Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Chlorophyllides; Electrochemotherapy; Electroporation; Humans; Indoles; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Neoplasms; Organometallic Compounds; Photochemotherapy; Porphyrins; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents | 2009 |
Electroporation of transplantable tumour for the enhanced accumulation of photosensitizers.
The aim of this study was to verify whether electroporation could increase the accumulation of the hydrophilic photosensitizers: aluminium phthalocyanine tetrasulphonate (AlPcS(4)) and chlorin e(6) (C e(6)) in tumour tissue. The experiment was performed in vivo using hybrid mice (C57Bl/CBA) bearing hepatoma A22 (MH-A22) tumours transplanted in the right haunch. The time dependence of the fluorescence intensity of administered photosensitizers was measured after the ordinary and electrically stimulated delivery. The obtained fluorescence spectroscopy results implied the tumour being affected by an electrical field in a way, which led to a higher accumulation of both photosensitizers (AlPcS(4) and C e(6)) in the periphery of the tumour and it superficial layer. Our pilot study suggests that electroporation could be considered as a useful procedure seeking for the more effective application of photodynamic tumour treatment. Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chlorophyllides; Electroporation; Indoles; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred CBA; Neoplasm Transplantation; Organometallic Compounds; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Spectrometry, Fluorescence | 2005 |
Localization of rose bengal, aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate, and chlorin e6 in the rabbit eye.
The localization and site of action of photosensitizers in the eye may be important for photodynamic therapy for fundus disorders but remain poorly understood for most agents. We investigated the intraocular localization of xanthene, phthalocyanine, and chlorin photosensitizers by using fluorescence microscopy and digital fundus fluorescence angiography.. Rose bengal (40 mg/kg), aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (CASPc) (5 mg/kg), or chlorin e6 (2 mg/kg) was intravenously administered to albino rabbits. The eyes were enucleated and examined by means of fluorescence microscopy 5, 20, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after dye injection. In vivo digital fundus fluorescence angiography with use of rose bengal (2-4 mg/kg), CASPc (2 mg/kg), and chlorin e6 (2 mg/kg) was performed.. For all agents studied pathologically, there was moderate fluorescence from the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium 5 minutes after dye injection. Mild fluorescence detected from the photoreceptor outer segments at 5 minutes was increased at 20 minutes. Angiographic studies with use of rose bengal, CASPc, and chlorin e6 revealed differences in the pattern and rate of photosensitizer accumulation.. Rose bengal, CASPc, and chlorin e6 accumulate rapidly in the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium and less rapidly in the outer retina. Differences in ocular localization of these photosensitizers were demonstrated. The significance of these findings for potential photodynamic therapy with these agents requires further investigation. Topics: Animals; Chlorophyllides; Eye; Fluorescein Angiography; Indoles; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Organometallic Compounds; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Rabbits; Rose Bengal; Tissue Distribution | 2002 |