all-bond-2 and reactive-orange-14

The ability of a restorative material to bond and seal the interface with tooth structure is perhaps the most significant factor in determining resistance to marginal caries. Thus, the quality and durability of marginal seal and bond strength are major considerations in the selection of restorative materials. The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength and marginal discrepancies of five adhesive systems: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond, KB 200, ProBond and AELITE Bond. Twenty-five buccal and 25 lingual cavities were prepared in 25 caries-free extracted molar teeth, giving 10 cavities for each of the 5 adhesive systems. All teeth were restored with the resin composite Pertac Hybrid, or PRISMA Total Performance Hybrid with their appropriate adhesive systems. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled, were stained with a 1.5% aqueous solution of a procion dye (reactive orange 14) and sectioned coronally with a saw microtome. Three sections of 200 microns thickness were prepared from each restoration which were then examined microscopically to measure marginal gap widths using a confocal tandem microscope. Shear bond strength measurements were carried out on the dentine bond using a universal testing machine. The All-Bond 2 adhesive system was found to have higher shear bond strength and to have the least gap width at the cementodentinal margin.

Topics: Adhesives; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; Coloring Agents; Composite Resins; Dental Bonding; Dental Caries; Dental Cavity Lining; Dental Cavity Preparation; Dental Cementum; Dental Leakage; Dental Marginal Adaptation; Dental Restoration, Permanent; Dental Stress Analysis; Dentin; Dentin-Bonding Agents; Humans; Materials Testing; Methacrylates; Microscopy, Confocal; Molar; Stress, Mechanical; Surface Properties; Thermodynamics; Triazines