alfaprostol and norgestomet

One hundred fifty beef heifers and 403 beef cows suckling calves were administered norgestomet implants (8 d) and alfaprostol, a PGF2 alpha analogue, approximately 28 h before implant removal. Thirty hours after implant removal, females were administered either GnRH via injection, GnRH via implantation, or no GnRH. The dosage of GnRH was 250 micrograms, and implants prolong the induced LH surge. Ovulation response, incidence of short cycles, and calving rate were analyzed as a 2 x 2 x 3 completely randomized factorial design with female (heifers and cows), estrous cycles (with or without), and GnRH as the main effects. There were no interactions (P > .10), and because heifers and cows had responses that did not differ (P > .25), they were summarized together. Females with estrous cycles had a higher (P < .05) ovulation response, fewer (P < .01) short luteal phases, and a higher (P < .01) calving rate than females without estrous cycles. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment increased the ovulation response (P < .01) and the calving rate (P < .05), and these responses were not affected (P > .10) by the method of GnRH administration. Based on these data, the increased ovulation response to GnRH may account for 29% of the increase in calving rate observed in the GnRH-treated females. In summary, in norgestomet- and alfaprostol-synchronized females, GnRH enhanced calving rate regardless of how it was administered. This increase was due to more than an increased ovulation rate.

Topics: Animals; Cattle; Drug Implants; Estrus Synchronization; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Injections, Intramuscular; Luteal Phase; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovulation; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Pregnenediones; Progesterone Congeners; Prostaglandins F; Random Allocation

Seventy-eight Simmental-Angus-Hereford crossbred yearling heifers, in 1983, and 99 similar heifers, in 1984, were used to compare two estrous synchrony regimens. One treatment group (SMB) was synchronized using the commercially available Syncro-Mate-B procedure, which involved placing a norgestomet implant in the ear for 9 d and giving an injection of norgestomet and estradiol valerate at the time of implantation. A second group (PR + PG) was given a norgestomet implant (PR) for 7 d and a 5-mg injection of alfaprostol (PG) at implant removal. Percentage of heifers cycling during the synchronization period and percent conceiving in 5 d or 30 d were not different (P greater than .10) due to treatment. The interval from implant removal to onset of behavioral estrus was shorter (P less than .01) for the heifers treated with SMB than for the heifers treated with PR + PG (42.8 vs 58.0 h). The group treated with SMB had a more uniform synchrony of estrus than the group treated with PR + PG. The effect of day of the estrous cycle at implantation on hours to estrus after implant removal was determined by a regression analysis, which showed a linear response for the SMB group with a slope of .78 (P = .09); the PR + PG group regression was cubic (P less than .01); this also indicated a more uniform response by the SMB group. These results indicate that the combination of norgestomet and alfaprostol produced more variation in interval from treatment to estrus than the Syncro-Mate-B procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Cattle; Drug Implants; Estrus Synchronization; Female; Pregnancy; Pregnenediones; Progestins; Prostaglandins F