abt-267 and ledipasvir

Hepatitis C treatment has changed considerably in recent years, and many interferon (IFN)-free therapies are now available. Considering the high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) presented by clinical trials for these treatments, high rates of effectiveness are also expected in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of IFN-free therapies for hepatitis C.. The search was performed in four electronic databases and included cohort studies that evaluated IFN-free schemes and provided data on SVR at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) as the primary outcome. Overall and subgroup meta-analyses of patients' clinical conditions (e.g. co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cirrhosis, liver transplant, specific genotypes, and other conditions) were performed.. Sixty-eight studies encompassing a total of 24,151 patients were included for quantitative and qualitative analyses, evaluating six treatments: sofosbuvir with ledipasvir, daclatasvir, or simeprevir; daclatasvir with asunaprevir; paritaprevir/ritonavir in combination with ombitasvir and dasabuvir; and sofosbuvir with ribavirin. The overall analysis showed SVR rates of 88-96% for all treatments except sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin, which had SVR rates of approximately 80%. The results of subgroup analyses showed that the genotype 3 virus appears to be the most difficult to treat.. In order to choose the best treatment option, it is necessary to consider the patients' conditions and characteristics. In conclusion, the use of IFN-free therapies meets the high expectations created by clinical trials, including patients in special clinical conditions.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

There has been a revolution in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Several oral regimens combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) from different families [NS5B nucleotide inhibitors, NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitors, NS5A replication complex inhibitors and NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PI)] have been developed. These regimens result in an increase in sustained virological response (SVR) rates to above 90% and reduce the duration of treatment to 12 weeks or less. As of 2016 several regimens will be approved with additive potencies, without cross-resistance and with a good safety profile. Remaining issues will include increasing screening and access to care so that HCV may become the first chronic viral infection eradicated worldwide. This review summarizes results obtained with oral DAA combinations that have been approved and/or have completed phase 3 clinical trials for HCV infection and discusses future perspectives.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Chronic hepatitis C, without treatment, can cause liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. The availability of new oral direct acting antivirals, such as the protease inhibitors simeprevir, asunaprevir and paritaprevir, the NS5A inhibitors daclatasvir, ledipasvir, and ombitasvir, the polymerase inhibitors Sofosbuvir and dasabuvir have resulted an enormous progress in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, leading to >90% sustained viral response rates. Even the hard-to-treat or previously treatment ineligible patients can be cured with the combination of these drugs. Furthermore the treatment duration is much shorter, and the side effects are minimal. Today, treatment of all hepatitis C virus infected patients is recommended, and the best choices are the interferon-free options. Eradication of hepatitis C virus has become realistic, however, appropriate screening programs are mandatory to achieve this goal.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Imidazoles; Interferons; Isoquinolines; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine; Viral Load; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Virus Replication

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Genotype; Germany; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Liver Cirrhosis; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine

Hepatitis C virus infection is a major health problem worldwide and no vaccine has yet been developed against this virus. In addition, currently approved pharmacotherapies achieve suboptimal cure rates and have side effects that result in non-compliance and premature treatment discontinuation. Significant research has been devoted to developing direct-acting antiviral agents that inhibit key viral functions. In particular, several novel drug candidates that inhibit the viral non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) have been demonstrated to possess high potency, pan-genotypic activity, and a high barrier to resistance. Clinical trials using combination therapies containing NS5A inhibitors have reported results that promise high cure rates and raise the possibility of developing interferon-free, all-oral regimens.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Proline; Pyrrolidines; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

New potent direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens against hepatitis C virus have been approved in recent years. However, information about the rate of adverse events (AEs) across different DAA regimens is limited. We aimed to evaluate differences in AEs and treatment efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), genotype (GT) 1 or 3, randomized to two different treatment arms, correspondingly.. We randomly assigned 96 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio, to treatment for 12 weeks with either paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir/dasabuvir/ribavirin (RBV) or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (SOF)/RBV if infected with GT1 (72 patients) or to daclatasvir/SOF/RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/RBV for 24 weeks, if infected with GT3 (24 patients). Data on AEs were collected throughout the entire study period.. A total of 70 (97%) patients with CHC with GT1 and 20 (83%) patients with GT3 achieved cure. The GT3 treatment arm was prematurely terminated, owing to change in national treatment guidelines. Thus, only AEs for GT1 patients are described. AEs occurred in 70 (97%) GT1 patients, and most common AEs were anemia (n=56/78%), fatigue (n=53/74%), and headache (n=33/46%). No difference was observed in relation to treatment group (P=1.0), anemia (P=1.0), or liver cirrhosis (P=0.53). In seven (11%) patients, AEs assessed by the investigator to be possibly related to the DAA regimen were still present 12 weeks after treatment.. We found no difference in AEs possibly related to the DAA regimen in patients with CHC, but surprisingly, AEs possibly related to the DAA regimen persisted in a significant number of patients after treatment. This finding can be of importance for clinicians in relation to patient information concerning AEs possibly related to DAA treatment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anemia; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Headache; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine; Viral Load

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a highly divergent virus currently classified into seven major genotypes and 86 subtypes (ICTV, June 2017), which can have differing responses to therapy. Accurate genotyping/subtyping using high-resolution HCV subtyping enables confident subtype identification, identifies mixed infections and allows detection of new subtypes. During routine genotyping/subtyping, one sample from an Equatorial Guinea patient could not be classified into any of the subtypes. The complete genomic sequence was compared to reference sequences by phylogenetic and sliding window analysis. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) were assessed by deep sequencing. The unclassified HCV genome did not belong to any of the existing genotype 1 (G1) subtypes. Sliding window analysis along the complete genome ruled out recombination phenomena suggesting that it belongs to a new HCV G1 subtype. Two NS5A RASs (L31V+Y93H) were found to be naturally combined in the genome which could limit treatment possibilities in patients infected with this subtype.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Viral; Equatorial Guinea; Female; Fluorenes; Gene Expression; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Humans; Imidazoles; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Mutation; Phylogeny; Proline; Pyrrolidines; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Fluorenes; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

Interferon-based regimens are associated with a substantial survival benefit for persons infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Survival data with direct-acting antiviral agents are not available. We conducted this study to quantify the effect of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir (PrOD) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) regimens upon mortality.. In the Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES), a well-established national cohort of HCV-infected Veterans, we identified HCV-infected persons initiated on PrOD or LDV/SOF, excluding those with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, hepatocellular carcinoma, or missing HCV RNA or FIB-4 scores. For each case, we identified a propensity score-matched control never initiated on treatment. Primary outcome was survival. Outcomes were assessed using frequency of events, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.. We identified 1473 persons on PrOD, 5497 on LDV/SOF, and 6970 propensity score-matched untreated persons. Treated persons were more likely to be obese and have cirrhosis, but less likely to have stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), alcohol or drug abuse or dependence diagnosis, and anemia. The proportion of persons who died was higher in the untreated group compared with either treatment group (PrOD, 0.3%; LDV/SOF, 1.4%; untreated controls, 2.5%; P < .001). A significantly larger percentage of treated patients survived to 18 months of follow-up, compared with untreated controls (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, treatment with either regimen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], .33-.57) and attainment of sustained virologic response (SVR) were associated with significantly lower mortality (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, .33-.99).. Treatment with PrOD or LDV/SOF and SVR are associated with a significant mortality benefit, apparent within the first 18 months of treatment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapies currently recommended for treating genotypes (GT) 1 and 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in the US.. A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for CHC from a US payer's perspective over a lifelong time horizon was performed. A Markov model based on the natural history of CHC was used for a population that included treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Treatment alternatives considered for GT1 included ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin (3D ± R), sofosbuvir + ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), sofosbuvir + simeprevir (SOF + SMV), simeprevir + pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SMV + PR) and no treatment (NT). For GT4 treatments, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + ribavirin (2D + R), SOF/LDV and NT were compared. Transition probabilities, utilities and costs were obtained from published literature. Outcomes included rates of compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related death (LrD), total costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.. In GT1 patients, 3D ± R and SOF-containing regimens have similar long-term outcomes; 3D ± R had the lowest lifetime risks of all liver disease outcomes: CC = 30.2%, DCC = 5.0 %, HCC = 6.8%, LT = 1.9% and LrD = 9.2%. In GT1 patients, 3D ± R had the lowest cost and the highest QALYs. As a result, 3D ± R dominated these treatment options. In GT4 patients, 2D + R had lower rates of liver morbidity and mortality, lower cost and more QALYs than SOF/LDV and NT.. While the results are based on input values, which were obtained from a variety of heterogeneous sources-including clinical trials, the findings were robust across a plausible range of input values, as demonstrated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. Among currently recommended treatments for GT1 and GT4 in the US, 3D ± R (for GT1) and 2D + R (for GT4) have a favorable cost-effectiveness profile.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrosis; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Proline; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Real-world data are needed to inform hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment decisions.. To assess the comparative effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (LDV/SOF ± RBV) vs. ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir (OPrD) ± RBV in genotype 1 HCV patients treated in routine medical practice.. Observational intent-to-treat cohort of genotype 1 patients initiating 8 or 12 weeks of LDV/SOF ± RBV or 12 weeks of OPrD ± RBV. Sustained virological response (SVR) required RNA below the limit of quantification at least 10 weeks after end of treatment.. 6961 patients initiated LDV/SOF (N = 4478), LDV/SOF + RBV (N = 1269), OPrD (N = 297), and OPrD + RBV (N = 917) at 126 facilities. Intention-to-treat SVR rates were 91.4% (3813/4170) for LDV/SOF, 90.0% (1098/1220) for LDV/SOF + RBV, 95.1% (269/283) for OPrD and 85.8% (746/869) for OPrD + RBV. SVR rates in those completing 8 weeks of LDV/SOF were 91.7% (1223/1333) and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF 94.6% (2475/2615), LDV/SOF + RBV 92.2% (1033/1120), OPrD 98.0% (248/253) and OPrD + RBV 95.5% (705/738). Significant predictors of SVR were African American race (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.59-0.86, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, P = 0.002), FIB4 > 3.25 (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.72, P < 0.001), OPrD + RBV compared to LDV/SOF (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.76, P < 0.001) and subtype 1b (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.71, P = 0.003). For those completing 12 weeks, FIB-4 > 3.25 and high BMI remained significant predictors.. In this robust real-world cohort, SVR rates were similar to clinical trials. FIB-4 > 3.25 and high BMI were significant negative predictors of SVR. Reduced odds of SVR in African Americans and with OPrD + RBV likely arose from excess early discontinuation as these factors were no longer significant, when limited to patients completing a 12-week course.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Black or African American; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine; Young Adult

New treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are highly effective in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of treatments for genotype 1 (GT1) HCV in HIV-coinfected patients.. A Markov model based on HCV natural history was used. The base-case analysis included both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Alternatives were ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (3D ± R) for 12 or 24 weeks, sofosbuvir plus peginterferon and R (SOF + PR) for 12 weeks, SOF + R for 24 weeks, and no treatment (NT). A subgroup analysis restricted to treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic patients compared 3D ± R for 12 weeks to SOF plus ledipasvir (LDV) for 12 weeks and NT. Transition probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from the published literature. Outcomes were measured over a lifetime horizon and included rates of compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death, total costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).. In the base-case, SOF + R was dominated by both SOF + PR and 3D ± R. Compared to SOF + PR, 3D ± R had an ICER of $45,581. The lifetime rates of liver morbidity and mortality were lower among those treated with 3D ± R compared to SOF + PR, SOF + R, or NT. In the subgroup analysis, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY (ICER $27,496). SOF/LDV had an ICER of $104,489 per QALY gained compared to 3D ± R.. In the GT1 HCV population coinfected with HIV, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT, SOF + R, and SOF + PR. In the treatment-naïve sub-population, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT and SOF/LDV.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Proline; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; United States; Uracil; Valine

Topics: Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; England; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Public Health; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine