abacavir and fosamprenavir

abacavir has been researched along with fosamprenavir* in 8 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for abacavir and fosamprenavir

ArticleYear
The continuing evolution of HIV therapy.
    The AIDS reader, 2003, Volume: 13, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Deoxycytidine; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Monitoring; Emtricitabine; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oxazines; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stavudine; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

2003

Trials

4 trial(s) available for abacavir and fosamprenavir

ArticleYear
Comparison of once-daily fosamprenavir boosted with either 100 or 200 mg of ritonavir, in combination with abacavir/lamivudine: 96-week results from COL100758.
    AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    The long-term efficacy of once-daily (qd) fosamprenavir (FPV) 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg (FPV/r100) has not been evaluated previously. A 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared the efficacy/safety of FPV/r100 with FPV 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 200 mg qd (FPV/r200), plus abacavir/lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg qd, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL)> or =1000 copies/ml. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving VL <400 copies/ml or discontinuing for drug-related reasons. In the intent-to-treat:exposed (ITT-E) population, missing = failure (M = F), and observed approaches were used to assess between-arm differences in VL responses by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and CD4(+) count by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. One hundred and fifteen (115) patients enrolled, with 58 on FPV/r100 (median VL 4.7 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 259 cells/mm(3)) and 57 on FPV/r200 (median VL 4.9 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 179 cells/mm(3)). Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients discontinued treatment prematurely (12 vs. 24) and experienced virologic failure (5 vs. 8, none developing major protease inhibitor resistance mutations). At week 96, more FPV/r100-treated patients had VL <400 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 78% (45/58) vs. 53% (30/57), p = 0.006; observed: 98% (45/46) vs. 94% (30/32)] and VL<50 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 66% (38/58) vs. 53% (30/57); observed: 83% (38/46) vs. 94% (30/32)]. The FPV/r100 and FPV/r200 arms were similar at week 96 regarding median change from baseline in CD4(+) count (+265 vs. +260 cells/mm(3)) and total cholesterol (+33 vs. +35 mg/dl), and in total-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (4.0 vs. 4.1) and type/frequency of treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events, although FPV/r100 was associated with a lower elevation in triglycerides (+27 vs. +48 mg/dl). In conclusion, through 96 weeks, FPV/r100 was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides than FPV/r200.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

2009
The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2006, Aug-05, Volume: 368, Issue:9534

    Lopinavir-ritonavir is a preferred protease inhibitor co-formulation for initial HIV-1 treatment. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir has shown similar efficacy and safety to lopinavir-ritonavir when each is combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We compared the two treatments directly in antiretroviral-naive patients.. This open-label, non-inferiority study included 878 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients randomised to receive either fosamprenavir-ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily, each with the co-formulation of abacavir-lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL at week 48 and treatment discontinuations because of an adverse event. The intent-to-treat analysis included all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00085943.. At week 48, non-inferiority of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to lopinavir-ritonavir (95% CI around the treatment difference -4.84 to 7.05) was shown, with 315 of 434 (73%) patients in the fosamprenavir-ritonavir group and 317 of 444 (71%) in the lopinavir-ritonavir group achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL. Treatment discontinuations due to an adverse event were few and occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups (fosamprenavir-ritonavir 53, 12%; lopinavir-ritonavir 43, 10%). Diarrhoea, nausea, and abacavir hypersensitivity were the most frequent drug-related grade 2-4 adverse events. Treatment-emergent drug resistance was rare; no patient had virus that developed reduced susceptibility to fosamprenavir-ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir.. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir twice daily in treatment-naive patients provides similar antiviral efficacy, safety, tolerability, and emergence of resistance as lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine.

    Topics: Carbamates; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Organophosphates; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

2006
Six-week randomized controlled trial to compare the tolerabilities, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activities of GW433908 and amprenavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004, Volume: 48, Issue:1

    This study compared the plasma amprenavir pharmacokinetics of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors amprenavir (Agenerase) 1,200 mg twice daily (BID) and the amprenavir prodrug GW433908, a formulation that substantially reduces the number of tablets per dose compared with amprenavir, at doses of 1,395 mg and 1,860 mg BID, in combination with abacavir 300 mg BID and lamivudine 150 mg BID in patients with HIV infection. Overall, 78 patients received study treatment. Compared with amprenavir 1,200 mg BID, both GW433908 1,395 mg BID and GW433908 1,860 mg BID delivered equivalent steady-state (ss) values for area under the plasma amprenavir concentration-time curve (AUC) at the end of a dosing interval (tau), lower maximum plasma amprenavir concentrations (30% lower), and higher plasma amprenavir concentrations at the end of a dosing interval (28% higher for GW433908 1,395 mg BID and 46% higher for GW433908 1,860 mg BID). Time-variant plasma amprenavir pharmacokinetics were observed with reductions in plasma amprenavir exposure over the first 4 weeks of dosing; the decrease in plasma amprenavir AUC(tau,ss) versus the AUC from 0 h to infinity was 27% for GW43308 1,395 mg, 45% for GW433908 1,860 mg, and 23% for amprenavir 1,200 mg. All three regimens reduced plasma HIV-1 RNA ( approximately 2 log(10) copies/ml) and increased CD4(+) cell counts ( approximately 100 cells/mm(3)) over the initial 28 days. Adverse event profiles were consistent with those previously reported for amprenavir. Although not statistically tested, the GW433908 groups appeared to have fewer gastrointestinal symptoms. In conclusion, the protease inhibitor GW433908 delivered comparable plasma amprenavir concentrations to those delivered by amprenavir 1,200 mg BID. GW433908, in combination with abacavir and lamivudine, demonstrated potent antiviral activity and was generally well tolerated over a 4-week period.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cross-Over Studies; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

2004
The NEAT study: a 48-week open-label study to compare the antiviral efficacy and safety of GW433908 versus nelfinavir in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2004, Jan-01, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    To compare the efficacy, durability, and tolerability of GW433908 (908), 1400 mg twice-daily (BID), with nelfinavir (NFV), 1250 mg BID.. This was an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label study (NEAT) in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV-infected adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) at screening > or =5000 copies/mL (c/mL). Patients were randomly assigned to 908 or NFV (2:1) for a minimum of 48 weeks, with a background of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC).. A total of 166 patients received randomized treatment with 908 BID and 83 received NFV BID. The population was diverse with regard to race and gender (76% Hispanics and blacks, 31% female) and had advanced HIV disease at screening (45% had vRNA >100,000 c/mL, 48% had CD4 cell counts <200 cells/mm3, 20% had a history of Centers for Disease Control class C events). After 48 weeks of study by an intention-to-treat rebound or discontinuation = failure analysis, a greater proportion of patients in the 908 BID group (66%) than the NFV BID group (51%) achieved vRNA <400 c/mL. Furthermore, more patients with screening vRNA >100,000 c/mL (67 vs. 35%) or CD4 <50 cells/mm3 (48 vs. 24%) achieved undetectable viral loads taking 908 BID compared with NFV BID, respectively. Favorable immunologic responses were observed for both groups. Diarrhea, which was more common in the NFV BID group (18 vs. 5%), was the only drug-related grade 2-4 adverse event with a significant difference (P = 0.002) in incidence between groups.. Administration of 908 BID resulted in a potent and sustained antiretroviral response, notably in ART-naive patients with advanced HIV disease. GW433908 was generally well tolerated and provides a convenient dosing option without food or fluid restrictions.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Organophosphates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

2004

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for abacavir and fosamprenavir

ArticleYear
Impact of individual antiretroviral drugs on the risk of myocardial infarction in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a case-control study nested within the French Hospital Database on HIV ANRS cohort CO4.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2010, Jul-26, Volume: 170, Issue:14

    The role of exposure to specific antiretroviral drugs on risk of myocardial infarction in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is debated in the literature.. To assess whether we confirmed the association between exposure to abacavir and risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and to estimate the impact of exposure to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and non-NRTIs on risk of MI, we conducted a case-control study nested within the French Hospital Database on HIV. Cases (n = 289) were patients who, between January 2000 and December 2006, had a prospectively recorded first definite or probable MI. Up to 5 controls (n = 884), matched for age, sex, and clinical center, were selected at random with replacement among patients with no history of MI already enrolled in the database when MI was diagnosed in the corresponding case. Conditional logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders.. Short-term/recent exposure to abacavir was associated with an increased risk of MI in the overall sample (odds ratios [ORs], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.64) but not in the subset of matched cases and controls (81%) who did not use cocaine or intravenous drugs (1.27; 0.64-2.49). Cumulative exposure to all PIs except saquinavir was associated with an increased risk of MI significant for amprenavir/fosamprenavir with or without ritonavir (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.21-1.94 per year) and lopinavir with ritonavir (1.33; 1.09-1.61 per year). Exposure to all non-NRTIs was not associated with risk of MI.. The risk of MI was increased by cumulative exposure to all the studied PIs except saquinavir and particularly to amprenavir/fosamprenavir with or without ritonavir and lopinavir with ritonavir, whereas the association with abacavir cannot be considered causal.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; France; Furans; HIV Infections; Hospitals, Isolation; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Organophosphates; Regression Analysis; Risk; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

2010
Highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated ptosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.
    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2009, Volume: 127, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Blepharoptosis; Carbamates; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oculomotor Muscles; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

2009
Phase III trials for new PI.
    AIDS patient care and STDs, 2001, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dideoxynucleosides; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nelfinavir; Organophosphates; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

2001