5-(2-2-dimethyl-1-3-propoxy-cyclophosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-n-oxide has been researched along with 5-5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for 5-(2-2-dimethyl-1-3-propoxy-cyclophosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-n-oxide and 5-5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide
Article | Year |
---|---|
Kinetic analysis of reactive oxygen species generated by the in vitro reconstituted NADPH oxidase and xanthine oxidase systems.
The nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and the xanthine oxidase (XOD) systems generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). In the present study, to characterize the difference between the two systems, the kinetics of ROS generated by both the NADH oxidase and XOD systems were analysed by an electron spin resonance (ESR) spin trapping method using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO), 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-pyrroline N-oxide (DEPMPO) and 5-(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propoxy cyclophosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (CYPMPO). As a result, two major differences in ROS kinetics were found between the two systems: (i) the kinetics of (•)OH and (ii) the kinetics of hydrogen peroxide. In the NADH oxidase system, the interaction of hydrogen peroxide with each component of the enzyme system (NADPH, NADH oxidase and FAD) was found to generate (•)OH. In contrast, (•)OH generation was found to be independent of hydrogen peroxide in the XOD system. In addition, the hydrogen peroxide level in the NADPH-NADH oxidase system was much lower than measured in the XOD system. This lower level of free hydrogen peroxide is most likely due to the interaction between hydrogen peroxide and NADPH, because the hydrogen peroxide level was reduced by ~90% in the presence of NADPH. Topics: Cyclic N-Oxides; Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide; Hydrogen Peroxide; Kinetics; NADP; NADPH Oxidases; Pyrroles; Reactive Oxygen Species; Spin Trapping; Superoxides; Xanthine Oxidase | 2011 |
Comparison of superoxide detection abilities of newly developed spin traps in the living cells.
This study compared the superoxide detection abilities of four spin traps, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO), 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DEPMPO), 5-(diphenylphosphinoyl)-5-methyl-1pyrroline N-oxide (DPPMPO) and 5-(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propoxy cyclophosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (CYPMPO) in living cells. Electron spin resonance (ESR) signals of the superoxide adducts were observed when spin traps were added to a suspension of human oral polymorphonuclear leukocytes (OPMNs) stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. The ESR signal of the CYPMPO-superoxide adduct (CYPMPO-OOH) increased for 24 min after the initiation of the reaction, whereas the signals from DMPO-OOH and DPPMPO-OOH peaked at 6 and 10 min, respectively. The maximum concentrations of DMPO-OOH, DPPMPO-OOH and CYPMPO-OOH in OPMNs were 1.9, 6.0 and 10.7 microM, respectively. Furthermore, CYPMPO could more efficiently trap superoxide in blood PMNs compared with DEPMPO. From these results, it was concluded that CYPMPO performs better than DMPO, DPPMPO and DEPMPO for superoxide measurements in living cell systems because it has lower cytotoxicity and its superoxide adduct has a longer lifetime. Topics: Carcinogens; Cells, Cultured; Cyclic N-Oxides; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy; Free Radicals; Humans; Neutrophils; Reactive Oxygen Species; Spin Labels; Superoxides; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate | 2009 |