2-amino-3-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-6-7-8-tetrahydrobenzothiophene and 1-3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine

The positive allosteric adenosine receptor modulator, T62 (2-amino-3-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzothiophene), has been shown to reduce mechanical allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. However, whether chronic oral T62 retains efficacy in this pain model has not been examined. Therefore, the authors studied antiallodynic effects of chronic oral T62 in spinal nerved-ligated rats, as well as motor and sedative behavioral effects.. Oral T62, 100 mg/kg, or oral oil was applied daily to spinal nerve-ligated rats for 4 weeks, with rat weights examined daily. Sedation, placing and ambulation scores, and withdrawal threshold were observed for 3 h daily for the first 2 weeks and then once a week. At the end of observation, the animals were killed, and the spinal tissues were collected for radioligand binding. In addition, withdrawal thresholds were also observed in rats with 5 days of treatment with 50 mg/kg oral T62. Furthermore, the effects of intrathecal adenosine on rats with oral T62 or oil treatment were compared.. Chronic oral T62, at 100 mg/kg, initially returned the withdrawal threshold to mechanical testing to preinjury levels, with minor or no sedative or motor effects. Tolerance was observed, with a 60% loss of most possible effects in antiallodynia within 5 days of daily administration. Similarly, tolerance also occurred with chronic oral T62 at 50 mg/kg but did not alter the effect of intrathecal adenosine. Furthermore, 4 weeks of exposure to 100 mg/kg T62 resulted in a small reduction in spinal cord A1 receptor number.. The results imply that chronically administered A1 adenosine modulators lose efficacy over time, partly as a result of receptor down-regulation.

Topics: Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Allosteric Regulation; Animals; Drug Tolerance; Male; Pain; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Adenosine A1; Spinal Nerves; Thiophenes; Xanthines

Novel allosteric enhancers of agonist binding to the rat adenosine A(1) receptor are described. The lead compound for the new series was PD 81,723 ((2-amino-4, 5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone), a compound previously reported by Bruns and co-workers (Mol. Pharmacol. 1990, 38, 950-958). The 4,5-dimethyl group and the benzoyl moiety were targets for further modifications, leading to series of 4, 5-dialkyl (12a-g), of tetrahydrobenzo (12h-u), and of tetrahydropyridine (13a-g) derivatives. A number of compounds, in particular 12b, 12e, 12j, 12n, and 12u, proved superior to PD 81,723. Their EC(50) values for enhancing the binding of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine to the receptor were lower, and/or their antagonistic activity on the adenosine A(1) receptor was shown to be diminished.

Topics: Adenosine; Allosteric Regulation; Animals; Binding, Competitive; Brain; Purinergic P1 Receptor Agonists; Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists; Rats; Thiophenes; Xanthines