1-1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and astragalin

The antioxidant activities of flavonoids and their glycosides were measured with the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH radical, DPPH(·)) scavenging method. The results show that free hydroxyl flavonoids are not necessarily more active than O-glycoside. Quercetin and kaempferol showed higher activity than apigenin. The C- and O-glycosides of flavonoids generally showed higher radical scavenging activity than aglycones; however, kaempferol C3-O-glycoside (astragalin) showed higher activity than kaempferol. In the radical scavenging activity of flavonoids, it was expected that OH substitutions at C3 and C5 and catechol substitution at C2 of B ring and intramolecular hydrogen bonding between OH at C5 and ketone at C3 would increase the activity; however, the reasons have yet to be clarified. We here show that the radical scavenging activities of flavonoids are controlled by their absolute hardness (η) and absolute electronegativity (χ) as a electronic state. Kaempferol and quercetin provide high radical scavenging activity since (i) OH substitutions at C3 and C5 strikingly decrease η of flavones, (ii) OH substitutions at C3 and C7 decrease χ and η of flavones, and (iii) phenol or o-catechol substitution at C2 of B ring decrease χ of flavones. The coordinate r(χ, η) as the electron state must be small to increase the radical scavenging activity of flavonoids. The results show that chemically soft kaempferol and quercetin have higher DPPH radical scavenging activity than chemically hard genistein and daidzein.

Topics: Biphenyl Compounds; Flavones; Flavonols; Free Radical Scavengers; Glycosides; Hydrogen Bonding; Kaempferols; Picrates; Quercetin

Natural flavonoids are secondary phenolic plant metabolites known for their bioactivity as antioxidants. The evaluation of this property is generally done by the estimation of their direct free radical-scavenging activity as hydrogen or electron donating compounds. This paper reviews experimental results available in the literature for a selection of flavonoids and compares them with calculated quantities characteristic of the hydrogen or electron donation. For that purpose, bond dissociation energies, ionization potentials and electron transfer enthalpies are computed by using DFT methods and the ONIOM procedure implemented in the ab initio program Gaussian. This process has been chosen because it can be extended to the study of large molecules. When acid dissociation and interaction with the solvent are taken into account, the results present very good concordance with experimental results, enlightening the complexity of the processes involved in the classical assays which measure the ability of compounds to scavenge the (2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt) radical cation (ABTS (+)) or the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl radical (DPPH(·)). This study demonstrates the good accuracy of theoretical calculations in obtaining the relative energies involved in free radical scavenging abilities and its capacity for predictive behaviour. It also highlights the necessity to take into account the pK(a) of the compounds and the solvent interaction. The ability of the method to calculate the antioxidant properties of larger molecules are tested on glycosylated flavonoids and the effects of sugar substitution on the antioxidant properties of flavonoids are investigated, pointing out the importance of the charges on the oxygen atoms.

Topics: Antioxidants; Apigenin; Benzothiazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Electrons; Flavonoids; Free Radical Scavengers; Glycosylation; Hydrogen; Hydrolysis; Kaempferols; Models, Chemical; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Oxidation-Reduction; Picrates; Quercetin; Solvents; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonic Acids; Thermodynamics

Six phenolics were obtained from the leaves of Prunus padus by activity-guided isolation: isorhamnetin 3-O-β-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-galactopyranoside (1), astragalin (2), hyperoside (3), quercetin 3-O-β-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-galactopyranoside (4), quercetin 3-O-β-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-glucopyranoside (5) and chlorogenic acid (6). The antioxidant potential of 70% methanolic extracts from the flowers and leaves collected over the growing season was evaluated using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and 2,2′-azobis-(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced linoleic acid (LA) peroxidation tests in relation to the contents of the isolates 1-6, total phenolics, total proanthocyanidins and total quercetin. The IC₅₀ values were expressed in gram dry weight per gram of DPPH or LA, respectively, and were in the range of 1.42-2.42 for the DPPH test and 1.78-4.92 for the LA peroxidation, with superior activity found for the flowers and the autumn leaves. Significant linear correlation of these values to the sum of proanthocyanidins and compounds 1-6 (R² > 0.87) showed that the listed phenolics are synergists of the tested activity.

Topics: Antioxidants; Biphenyl Compounds; Chlorogenic Acid; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Flowers; Free Radical Scavengers; Glycosides; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Kaempferols; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Mass Spectrometry; Phenols; Picrates; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Prunus; Quercetin; Ultraviolet Rays