Page last updated: 2024-12-06

n-leucyldoxorubicin

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

N-leucyldoxorubicin: structure given in first source; a prodrug of doxorubicin [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID68897
CHEMBL ID3989596
SCHEMBL ID1231191
MeSH IDM0198519

Synonyms (32)

Synonym
rp-39937
ct-012002
leu-dox
e-88/032
doxogenix l
leurubicin
l-adr
(2s)-2-amino-n-[(2s,3s,4s,6r)-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-6-[[(1s,3s)-3,5,12-trihydroxy-3-(2-hydroxyacetyl)-10-methoxy-6,11-dioxo-2,4-dihydro-1h-tetracen-1-yl]oxy]oxan-4-yl]-4-methylpentanamide
70774-25-3
n-leucyldoxorubicin
n-l-leucyldoxorubicin
n-leucyl-doxorubicin
n-l-leucyl-doxorubicin
leucyl-doxorubicin
leurubicina
leurubicine
unii-1z20mgk851
leurubicin [inn]
1z20mgk851 ,
leurubicinum
(8s,10s)-10-((3-((s)-2-amino-4-methylvaleramido)-2,3,6-trideoxy-alpha-l-lyxo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-8-glycoloyl-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,8,11-trihydroxy-1-methoxy-5,12-naphthacenedione
leurubicina [inn-spanish]
leurubicinum [inn-latin]
leurubicine [inn-french]
(8s,10s)-10-((3-((s)-2-amino-4-methylvaleramido)-2,3,6-trideoxy-.alpha.-l-lyxo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-8-glycoloyl-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,8,11-trihydroxy-1-methoxy-5,12-naphthacenedione
SCHEMBL1231191
CHEMBL3989596
3,5,12-trihydroxy-3-(hydroxyacetyl)-10-methoxy-6,11-dioxo-1,2,3,4,6,11-hexahydrotetracen-1-yl 3-[(2-amino-1-hydroxy-4-methylpentylidene)amino]-2,3,6-trideoxyhexopyranoside
DTXSID50991030
(s)-2-amino-n-((2s,3s,4s,6r)-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-6-(((1s,3s)-3,5,12-trihydroxy-3-(2-hydroxyacetyl)-10-methoxy-6,11-dioxo-1,2,3,4,6,11-hexahydrotetracen-1-yl)oxy)tetrahydro-2h-pyran-4-yl)-4-methylpentanamide
Q27253246
AKOS040747057

Research Excerpts

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"A pharmacokinetic study of N-L-leucyl-doxorubicin, a new derivative of doxorubicin, has been undertaken during a phase I trial in 19 patients with advanced cancer after intravenous bolus administration at doses ranging from 30 to 240 mg/m2."( Human pharmacokinetics of N-L-leucyl-doxorubicin, a new anthracycline derivative, and its correlation with clinical toxicities.
Baurain, R; Bugat, R; Canal, P; de Forni, M; Magis, A; Marty, M; Pujade-Lauraine, E; Ramon, M; Robert, J; Tresca, P, 1992
)
0.28
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Bioassays (2)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1447933Retention time of compound by LC-MS analysis2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Rationalized Computer-Aided Design of Matrix-Metalloprotease-Selective Prodrugs.
AID1447948Cytotoxicity against human U87MG cells treated with MJ02 assessed as reduction in cell survival after 96 hrs by MTT assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Rationalized Computer-Aided Design of Matrix-Metalloprotease-Selective Prodrugs.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (14)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's10 (71.43)18.2507
2000's2 (14.29)29.6817
2010's2 (14.29)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 11.53

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be weak demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index11.53 (24.57)
Research Supply Index2.83 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.36 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index0.00 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index0.00 (0.95)

This Compound (11.53)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials2 (14.29%)5.53%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other12 (85.71%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]