Page last updated: 2024-12-11

efavirenz, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate drug combination

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination: Inhibitor of reverse transcriptases or of RNA-directed DNA polymerases. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID9833525
MeSH IDM0548057

Synonyms (8)

Synonym
efavirenz, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate drug combination
731772-50-2
efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
efavirenz / emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil
qdrmcfdxpieygx-nwrgjbojsa-n
4-amino-5-fluoro-1-[(2r,5s)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-oxathiolan-5-yl]pyrimidin-2-one;[[(2r)-1-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)propan-2-yl]oxymethyl-(propan-2-yloxycarbonyloxymethoxy)phosphoryl]oxymethyl propan-2-yl carbonate;(e)-but-2-enedioic acid;(4s)-6-chloro-4-(2-cyc
efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovirdisoproxilfumaratemixt.
efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate mixt.

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" There is a need for an effective and safe first-line regimen, to cope with the ever-increasing incidence of non-adherence and primary resistance."( WITHDRAWN. Effectiveness and safety of first-line tenofovir + emtricitabine + efavirenz for patients with HIV.
Okwundu, CI; Omeje, I, 2012
)
0.38
" More patients in the AZT-3TC group than in the TDF-FTC group had adverse events resulting in discontinuation of the study drugs (9% vs."( WITHDRAWN. Effectiveness and safety of first-line tenofovir + emtricitabine + efavirenz for patients with HIV.
Okwundu, CI; Omeje, I, 2012
)
0.38
" There is a need for an effective and safe first-line regimen, to cope with the ever-increasing incidence of non-adherence and primary resistance."( WITHDRAWN: Effectiveness and safety of first-line tenofovir + emtricitabine + efavirenz for patients with HIV.
Okwundu, CI; Omeje, I, 2012
)
0.38
" More patients in the AZT-3TC group than in the TDF-FTC group had adverse events resulting in discontinuation of the study drugs (9% vs."( WITHDRAWN: Effectiveness and safety of first-line tenofovir + emtricitabine + efavirenz for patients with HIV.
Okwundu, CI; Omeje, I, 2012
)
0.38
" Adverse events were mostly mild and no serious adverse events or drug discontinuations were reported."( Efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine combined with first-line tuberculosis treatment in tuberculosis-HIV-coinfected Tanzanian patients: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Aarnoutse, RE; Boeree, MJ; Burger, DM; Fillekes, Q; Kibiki, GS; Kisanga, ER; Kisonga, RM; Mleoh, L; Mtabho, CM; Ndaro, A; Semvua, HH; van den Boogaard, J; van der Ven, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Overall, 71 of 281 raltegravir recipients (25%) and 98 of 282 efavirenz recipients (35%) discontinued the study; discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 14 (5%) and 28 (10%) patients in the respective groups."( Durable efficacy and safety of raltegravir versus efavirenz when combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: final 5-year results from STARTMRK.
DeJesus, E; DiNubile, MJ; Leavitt, R; Lennox, JL; Miller, M; Nguyen, BY; Rockstroh, JK; Rodgers, AJ; Saag, MS; Sklar, P; Teppler, H; Walker, ML; Wan, H; Yazdanpanah, Y, 2013
)
0.39
" Over the entire study, fewer patients experienced neuropsychiatric and drug-related adverse events in the raltegravir group than in the efavirenz group."( Durable efficacy and safety of raltegravir versus efavirenz when combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: final 5-year results from STARTMRK.
DeJesus, E; DiNubile, MJ; Leavitt, R; Lennox, JL; Miller, M; Nguyen, BY; Rockstroh, JK; Rodgers, AJ; Saag, MS; Sklar, P; Teppler, H; Walker, ML; Wan, H; Yazdanpanah, Y, 2013
)
0.39

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" To summarize, the pharmacokinetic profile of efavirenz remained similar in the pregnant and non-pregnant rats."( Pharmacokinetic profiling of efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir fixed dose combination in pregnant and non-pregnant rats.
Bhyrapuneni, G; Kandikere, V; Komarneni, P; Muddana, N; Mudigonda, K; Mukkanti, K; Nirogi, R; Saralaya, R, 2012
)
0.38
"This was a Phase II open-label multiple dose pharmacokinetic and safety study."( Efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine combined with first-line tuberculosis treatment in tuberculosis-HIV-coinfected Tanzanian patients: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Aarnoutse, RE; Boeree, MJ; Burger, DM; Fillekes, Q; Kibiki, GS; Kisanga, ER; Kisonga, RM; Mleoh, L; Mtabho, CM; Ndaro, A; Semvua, HH; van den Boogaard, J; van der Ven, A, 2013
)
0.39
"A total of 25 patients (56% male) completed the study; 21 had evaluable pharmacokinetic profiles."( Efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine combined with first-line tuberculosis treatment in tuberculosis-HIV-coinfected Tanzanian patients: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Aarnoutse, RE; Boeree, MJ; Burger, DM; Fillekes, Q; Kibiki, GS; Kisanga, ER; Kisonga, RM; Mleoh, L; Mtabho, CM; Ndaro, A; Semvua, HH; van den Boogaard, J; van der Ven, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Coadministration of efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine with a standard first-line TB treatment regimen did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of these drugs and was tolerated well by Tanzanian TB patients who are coinfected with HIV."( Efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine combined with first-line tuberculosis treatment in tuberculosis-HIV-coinfected Tanzanian patients: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Aarnoutse, RE; Boeree, MJ; Burger, DM; Fillekes, Q; Kibiki, GS; Kisanga, ER; Kisonga, RM; Mleoh, L; Mtabho, CM; Ndaro, A; Semvua, HH; van den Boogaard, J; van der Ven, A, 2013
)
0.39
" Pharmacokinetic assessments occurred on days 7, 28, 35, and 42; trough samples (Ctrough) were collected periodically until day 63."( Pharmacokinetics of Co-Formulated Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate After Switch From Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Healthy Subjects.
Custodio, JM; Dave, A; Fordyce, M; Kearney, BP; Ling, KH; Ramanathan, S; Szwarcberg, J; Wang, H; Wei, X, 2016
)
0.43
" CYP2B6 poor metabolizers displayed higher EFV AUCtau and Cmax (125% and 91%, respectively) versus non-poor metabolizers, and lower EVG and COBI exposures."( Pharmacokinetics of Co-Formulated Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate After Switch From Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Healthy Subjects.
Custodio, JM; Dave, A; Fordyce, M; Kearney, BP; Ling, KH; Ramanathan, S; Szwarcberg, J; Wang, H; Wei, X, 2016
)
0.43

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" For TB drugs, equivalence was suggested for peak plasma concentrations when administered with and without efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine."( Efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine combined with first-line tuberculosis treatment in tuberculosis-HIV-coinfected Tanzanian patients: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Aarnoutse, RE; Boeree, MJ; Burger, DM; Fillekes, Q; Kibiki, GS; Kisanga, ER; Kisonga, RM; Mleoh, L; Mtabho, CM; Ndaro, A; Semvua, HH; van den Boogaard, J; van der Ven, A, 2013
)
0.39

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Many HIV-1-infected patients who are treatment-naive or treatment-experienced with susceptible virus will potentially have more options to reduce pill burden and optimize dosage schedules with one pill once-daily regimens."( Once-daily single-tablet regimens: a long and winding road to excellence in antiretroviral treatment.
Clotet, B; Llibre, JM,
)
0.13
"In this highly adherent population, the number of daily pills was related to self-reported health status but not to self-reported adherence, whereas the dosing interval did not influence self-reported adherence or health status."( Number of daily pills, dosing schedule, self-reported adherence and health status in 2010: a large cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy.
Bocchiola, B; Cahua, T; Castagna, A; Danise, A; Galli, L; Gianotti, N; Lazzarin, A; Maillard, M; Panzini, P; Pazzi, A; Salpietro, S; Zandonà, D, 2013
)
0.39
" "Untimed" EFV concentrations with unknown dosing and collection time were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method."( Untimed Efavirenz Drug Levels After Switching From Brand to Generic Formulations: A Short Communication.
Atkinson, K; Auyeung, K; Barrios, R; Baynes, KA; Brumme, CJ; Lepik, KJ; Sereda, P; Toy, J; Watson, BE, 2021
)
0.62
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (66)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's16 (24.24)29.6817
2010's40 (60.61)24.3611
2020's10 (15.15)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 10.27

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be weak demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index10.27 (24.57)
Research Supply Index4.45 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.72 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index0.00 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index0.00 (0.95)

This Compound (10.27)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials12 (16.44%)5.53%
Reviews6 (8.22%)6.00%
Case Studies10 (13.70%)4.05%
Observational1 (1.37%)0.25%
Other44 (60.27%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (29)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir and Tenofovir-diphosphate, Emtricitabine and Emtricitabine-triphosphate, and Efavirenz Once Daily Over 10 Days Following Drug Intake Cessation in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01108926]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study to Determine if Raltegravir Eradicates HIV From Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells [NCT01173510]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-23Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was not feasible due to facility budget and contractual issues.)
Pilot Study of the Effect of a Non-tenofovir, Non-efavirenz-based HIV Regimen on Bone Density and Vitamin D Levels in African-American Patients With HIV Infection [NCT01343225]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-05-31Not yet recruiting
Systematic Empirical vs. Test-guided Anti-tuberculosis Treatment Impact in Severely Immunosuppressed HIV-infected Adults Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy With CD4 Cell Counts <100/mm3: the STATIS Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02057796]Phase 41,050 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Change in Sleep Architecture and Neuropsychological Performance Following Switch From Atripla to Stribild. [NCT02283060]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
A Phase IV Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Dual-arm, Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Switching Individuals Receiving Efavirenz With Continuing Central Nervous System (CNS) Toxicity, to Dolutegravir [NCT02285374]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-30Not yet recruiting
Phase III Study of the Virologic Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir-Containing Versus Efavirenz-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in HIV-1-Infected Pregnant Women and Their Infants [NCT03048422]Phase 3643 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-19Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elvitegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/GS-9350 Versus Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naiv [NCT01095796]Phase 3707 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety and Efficacy of GSK1349572 Plus Abacavir/Lamivudine Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy Administered Once Daily Compared to Atripla Over 96 Weeks in HIV-1 Infected Antiretroviral Therapy Naive Adult Subjects [NCT01263015]Phase 3844 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-01Completed
Phase IIb, Double-Blinded, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Assess the Effect on Central Nervous System (CNS) Toxicity of Switching From ATRIPLA™ (Efavirenz, Tenofovir, Emtricitabine) to MK-1439A (Doravirine, Tenofovir, Lamivudine) in Virologically-Suppre [NCT02652260]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-04Active, not recruiting
Open Label, Randomized Trial of TDF/FTC+Raltegravir Vs. TDF/FTC+Efavirenz in HIV-1-Infected Women: Differential Effects on Viral Suppression/Reservoir, & Immune Parameters in Different Compartments, Including Gut & Genital Tract [NCT00984152]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Decision not to go forth with study.)
The Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Intracellular Tenofovir-diphosphate and Tenofovir When Coadministered With Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate During the Maintenance Phase of Tuberculosis Treatment in TB/HIV-1 Coinfected Participants [NCT04424264]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-05Completed
A Phase 4, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess the Effect on Lipid Profile of Switching From a Stable HAART Regimen of Fixed Dose Abacavir/Lamivudine (Kivexa) Plus Efavirenz, to Once Daily Atripla in Adult HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Raise [NCT00615810]Phase 4159 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Nucleoside-Sparing Combination Therapy With Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) + Raltegravir (RAL) vs. Efavirenz (EFV) + Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate + Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients [NCT00752856]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-26Completed
Potential Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Antiretroviral Agents as Fixed-dose Combinations and Riociguat in HIV Patients [NCT02556268]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-23Completed
A Phase IV, Open-label, Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate Virological Response in Antiretroviral-Experienced HIV 1 Infected Subjects Switching to Atripla (Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF) on an Empty Stomach [NCT00615745]Phase 4115 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elvitegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/GS-9350 Versus Atripla® (Efavirenz 600 mg/Emtricitabine 200 mg/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 300 mg) in HIV-1 Infected, Anti [NCT00869557]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Phase 3 Randomized Trial Evaluating the Virological Efficacy and the Tolerance of 4 New Simplified Antiretroviral Treatments in Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients in Dakar and Yaounde [NCT00573001]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Reducing Early Mortality and Early Morbidity by Empiric Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens (REMEMBER) [NCT01380080]Phase 4851 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Phase III Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1439A Once-Daily Versus ATRIPLA™ Once-Daily in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1 Infected Subjects [NCT02403674]Phase 3734 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-05Completed
A Phase 3B, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Tablet Regimen of Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Compared With a Single Tablet Regimen of Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumara [NCT01309243]Phase 3799 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effects of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) Versus Statin Therapy on Endothelial Function and Markers of Inflammation/Coagulation In HIV-Infected Individuals With High CD4 Cell Counts [NCT01515813]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to On 05/08/12, team working on revising protocol and re-open study under version 2.0)
WRHI 060 (ADVANCE): A Randomised, Phase 3 Non-inferiority Study of DTG + TAF + FTC Compared With DTG + TDF + FTC and EFV + TDF + FTC in Patients Infected With HIV-1 Starting First-line Antiretroviral Therapy - Extension to 192 Weeks [NCT03122262]Phase 31,110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-16Completed
Virological and Immunological Safety of a Dose Reduction Strategy Antiretroviral Regimen With Efavirenz / Tenofovir / Emtricitabine [NCT01778413]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Switching From a Regimen Consisting of Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) to Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine/ Tenofovir Alafenamide (FTC/RPV/TAF [NCT02345226]Phase 3881 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-26Completed
A Randomized Evaluation of Antiretroviral Therapy Alone or With Delayed Chemotherapy Versus Antiretroviral Therapy With Immediate Adjunctive Chemotherapy for Treatment of Limited Stage AIDS-KS in Resource-Limited Settings (REACT-KS) AMC 067 [NCT01352117]Phase 3192 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-18Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected Virologically Suppressed Adults [NCT03532425]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-29Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties enrolling participants)
A Randomized Comparison of Three Regimens of Chemotherapy With Compatible Antiretroviral Therapy for Treatment of Advanced AIDS-KS in Resource-Limited Settings [NCT01435018]Phase 3334 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-01Completed
HIV Testing and Treatment to Prevent Onward HIV Transmission Among MSM and Transgender Women in Lima, Peru [NCT01815580]Phase 4225 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00752856 (4) [back to overview]Viral Suppression Efficacy at 48 Weeks
NCT00752856 (4) [back to overview]To Compare the Phase 1 Viral Decay Rates Between LPV/r + RAL vs. EFV/TDF/FTC Treatment Combinations.
NCT00752856 (4) [back to overview]Compare Late Activated CD4+ T-cell Recovery Rates Between Treatment Regimens From Baseline to Week 48
NCT00752856 (4) [back to overview]Compare Early Activated CD4+ T-cell Recovery Rates From Baseline to Week 4.
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 24
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success at Weeks 24 and 48 Using FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis and HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL
NCT00869557 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA (log_10 Copies/mL)
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 Using the FDA-defined Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 144
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 192
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96
NCT01095796 (7) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Time to Viral Suppression (<50 c/mL)
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40,48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Confirmed Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level >=1000 c/mL at or After Week 16 and Before Week 24, or a Confirmed Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level >=200 c/mL at or After Week 24
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Genotypic Resistance With Virological Failure (VF) Through 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 1 to 4 Clinical and Hematology Toxicities at Week144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Post-baseline HIV-associated Conditions and Progression, Excluding Recurrences at Week 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Responding Based on Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 96 and Week 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144
NCT01263015 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Symptom Bother Score (SBS) at Week 4 Through Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, Participants With Viral Resistance
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, All Participants
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 48
NCT01309243 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Suppression
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Etoposide Dose Modification
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Suppression
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Partial or Complete Response by Week 96
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Progressive Disease by Week 96
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of KS Progressive Disease After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of KS Response After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of KS-IRIS
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Change in Peripheral Blood CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Change in Peripheral Blood CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count
NCT01352117 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ARV Dose Modification
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of First AIDS Progression by Week 96
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Any Component of TB Treatment by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Targeted Laboratory Value That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Reportable Hospitalization by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Death or Unknown Vital Status by Week 24
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of TB Treatment by Week 96
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]CD4+ T-cell Count
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]CD4+ T-cell Count Change From Baseline
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 24
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 48
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Death by Week 24
NCT01380080 (16) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With TB Diagnosis by Week 96
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, Virologic Failure, or KS-IRIS by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, or Virologic Failure by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, or Virologic Failure by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of IERC-confirmed KS Progression by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of IERC-confirmed KS Progression by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Death for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Death for BV+ART vs PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Death by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Death by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Change in KS Treatment by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Change in KS Treatment by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Response for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of AIDS-defining Event by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of AIDS-defining Event by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Kaposi's Sarcoma-Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (KS-IRIS) for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Kaposi's Sarcoma-Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (KS-IRIS) for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Progression-Free Survival by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of Progression-Free Survival by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, or AIDS Defining Event by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, or AIDS Defining Event by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, Virologic Failure, or KS-IRIS by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Response for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Time to IERC-confirmed KS Progression or Death for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Time to IERC-confirmed KS Progression or Death for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Changes in CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Changes in CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 2
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 3
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 4
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Peripheral Neuropathy (PN)
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Symptomatic Peripheral Neuropathy (SPN)
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related Toxicities and Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01435018 (37) [back to overview]Self-reported Adherence to ART Therapy
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Adherence to ART Regimen (Percentage of Pills Taken)
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Diagnosed With Acute HIV Infection Who Were Linked to Care
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Partner Tracing
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Whose HIV Sequences Appear in Phylogenetically Defined Clusters
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Adherence to CD4 Procedure
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Adherence to Questionnaires
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Adherence to Viral Load (VL) Procedure
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Retained in Care
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HIV Viral Load Suppression in Plasma
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HIV Viral Load Suppression in Semen
NCT01815580 (11) [back to overview]Sequence Clusters Identified Using Phylogenetic Analysis Among Participants With Early HIV Infection
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HIV Symptoms Index Score (HIVSI) at Week 48
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HIVSI Score at Week 96
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Hip BMD at Week 96
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot
NCT02345226 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tier-1 Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Cholesterol at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to an AE(s)
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 AE
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies/mL at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Below the Limit of Quantification (BLoQ) at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tier-2 Neuropsychiatric AEs
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Doravirine at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C at Week 48
NCT02403674 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C at Week 48
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 and <40 Copies/ml at Week 24 Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Lipids Between Time of Switch and Week 24 Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least One CNS Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Week 4
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least One CNS Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Time of Switch, and at 24 Weeks Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least One Central Nervous System (CNS) Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug-related SAEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug-related AEs Through Study Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug-related AEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More AEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) Through Study Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE Through Study Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Change From Time of Switch to Week 24 Post Switch in CD4 T-cell Count for the Combined Treatment Groups
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CNS Toxicity Score at Week 4
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CNS Toxicity Score at Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]CNS Toxicity Scores at Time of Switch, and at 24 Weeks Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through Study Week 12
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More SAEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch
NCT02652260 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug-related SAEs Through Study Week 12
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Change in Maternal Weight Antepartum
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Infant Deaths
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery Based on FDA Snapshot Algorithm
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at 50 Weeks Postpartum Based on FDA Snapshot Algorithm
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Delivery Measured at Central Laboratory
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at 50 Weeks Postpartum
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 ARV Drug Resistance Mutations at the Time of Maternal Virologic Failure
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mother-Infant Pairs With Preterm Deliveries
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mother-infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome or Major Congenital Anomaly
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mother-Infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Infants Born Small for Gestational Age
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Maternal Change in Creatinine Clearance
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Women Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Infants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Infants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mother-infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Infant HIV-infection
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Count of Infants With HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Mutations at the Time of Infant HIV Diagnosis
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Change in Maternal Weight Postpartum
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Change in Maternal Weight Overall
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Infant Creatinine Clearance
NCT03048422 (23) [back to overview]Time to First HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Through Delivery

Viral Suppression Efficacy at 48 Weeks

To determine the antiviral efficacy of LPV/r + RAL compared to EFV/TDF/FTC after 48 weeks of treatment by achieving undetectable viral load (NCT00752856)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 - Kaletra + Isentress Taken Twice Daily86
2 - Atripla Taken Once Daily87.5

[back to top]

To Compare the Phase 1 Viral Decay Rates Between LPV/r + RAL vs. EFV/TDF/FTC Treatment Combinations.

Repeated HIV RNA measured at different time points (baseline, days 2, 7, 10, 14) will be treated as the outcome variable in a linear mixed-effects model. The primary fixed effects will include time, treatment group, treatment group-by-time interaction; random effects will include both intercept and slope allowing each subject to have individual baseline viral load and viral decay (rate of decrease in viral load following initiation of antiretroviral therapy). The treatment group-by- time interaction term in the model will indicate the difference in viral decay rates between the two treatment groups. Baseline covariate adjustment will be included if necessary. (NCT00752856)
Timeframe: Baseline, days 2, 7, 10, 14

Interventionlog(10)/day (Median)
1 - Kaletra + Isentress Taken Twice Daily0.47
2 - Atripla Taken Once Daily0.55

[back to top]

Compare Late Activated CD4+ T-cell Recovery Rates Between Treatment Regimens From Baseline to Week 48

To compare late (baseline to Week 48) activated CD4+ T-cell recovery rates between treatment regimens. (NCT00752856)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Mean)
1 - Kaletra + Isentress Taken Twice Daily-2.24
2 - Atripla Taken Once Daily-5.65

[back to top]

Compare Early Activated CD4+ T-cell Recovery Rates From Baseline to Week 4.

To compare early (baseline to Week 4) activated CD4+ T-cell recovery rates between treatment regimens. (NCT00752856)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Mean)
1 - Kaletra + Isentress Taken Twice Daily-3.81
2 - Atripla Taken Once Daily-1.18

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

The percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was summarized. (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild89.6
Atripla87.0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 24

The percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was summarized. (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild89.6
Atripla87.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
Stribild240
Atripla166

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24

Change = Week 24 value minus baseline value (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
Stribild161
Atripla117

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success at Weeks 24 and 48 Using FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis and HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL

The percentage of participants with virologic success at Weeks 24 and 48 assessed using the FDA-defined snapshot analysis for an HIV-1 RNA cutoff of 50 copies/mL was summarized. (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Virologic Success at Week 24Virologic Success at Week 48
Atripla87.082.6
Stribild89.691.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA (log_10 Copies/mL)

Change = Week 24 or 48 value minus baseline value (NCT00869557)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48

,
Interventionlog_10 copies/mL (Mean)
Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 48
Atripla-2.88-2.71
Stribild-2.87-2.89

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild87.6
Atripla84.1

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 Using the FDA-defined Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild85.9
Atripla83.2

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 144

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 144

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild80.2
Atripla75.3

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild88.8
Atripla85.5

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 192

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 192

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild76.1
Atripla78.1

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96

(NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stribild84.2
Atripla81.5

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

Change = value of the relevant time point minus the baseline value (NCT01095796)
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

,
Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
Change at Wk 48 (Stribild, n=325; Atripla, n=315)Change at Wk 96 (Stribild, n=307; Atripla, n=302)Change at Wk 144 (Stribild, n=294; Atripla, n=283)Change at Wk 192 (Stribild, n=62; Atripla, n=69)
Atripla206273300328
Stribild239295321360

[back to top]

Time to Viral Suppression (<50 c/mL)

Viral suppression is defined as the first viral load value<50 c/mL. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to viral suppression, defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment until the first viral load value <50 c/mL was reached. Participants who withdrew for any reason without having suppressed prior to the analysis were censored. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 144) (average of 877.4 days for DTG; average of 788.8 study days for EFV/TDF/FTC)

InterventionDays (Median)
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily28
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144

CD4 lymphocyte cells (also called T-cells or T-helper cells) are the primary targets of HIV. The CD4 count and the CD4 percentage mark the degree of immunocompromise. The CD4 count is used to stage the patient's disease, determine the risk of opportunistic illnesses, assess prognosis, and guide decisions about when to start antiretroviral therapy. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Indicated visit minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were assessed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144

,
Interventioncells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3) (Mean)
Week 4, n=404,390Week 8, n=396,382Week 12, n=394,378Week 16, n=386,366Week 24, n=388,361Week 32, n=380,353Week 40, n=364,347Week 48, n=368,344Week 60, n=359,330Week 72, n=354,319Week 84, n=352,314Week 96, n=343,309Week 108, n=339,300Week 120, n=332,287Week 132, n=323,283Week 144, n=313,270
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily117.6164.6187.5214.7216.9250.5265.5267.5271.3306.1315.2322.6349.3347.0377.9379.5
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily80.9124.4153.0174.1177.8208.1216.2209.5235.3269.6272.1286.0298.9311.0327.2333.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40,48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of HIV-1 RNA in plasma. Changes from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were assessed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144

,
Interventionlog10 copies/mL (Mean)
Week 2, n=387, 376Week 4, n=404, 391Week 8, n=395, 386Week 12, n=394, 377Week 16, n=386, 366Week 24, n=389, 364Week 32, n=380, 355Week 40, n=370, 345Week 48, n=370, 343Week 60, n=360, 330Week 72, n=354, 320Week 84, n=353, 314Week 96, n=345, 310Week 108, n=340, 300Week 120, n=333, 289Week 132, n=323, 284Week 144, n=313,269
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily-2.46-2.88-2.99-3.01-3.03-3.05-3.04-3.05-3.03-3.03-3.03-3.02-2.99-3.01-3.00-3.03-3.02
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily-1.96-2.25-2.60-2.85-2.98-3.01-3.05-3.04-3.04-3.05-3.06-3.07-3.06-3.08-3.07-3.06-3.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Confirmed Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level >=1000 c/mL at or After Week 16 and Before Week 24, or a Confirmed Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level >=200 c/mL at or After Week 24

Data are presented as Kaplan Meier estimates of virologic failure (VF), defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >=1000 c/mL at or after Week 16 and before Week 24, or a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >=200 c/mL at or after Week 24. A plasma HIV-1 RNA value was considered to be confirmed failure if a consecutive measurement satisfied the same failure criterion. The number of participants who experienced autoimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) VFs was measured. For participants who withdrew from the study/were not documented to have reached confirmed VF at the cut off date of the Week 48 analysis, time to VF was to be censored at the planned visit week of the last measured plasma HIV-1 RNA sample. Data for participants who missed three consecutive scheduled plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements were to be censored at the planned visit week of the last assessment prior to the 3 consecutive missed visits. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 144) (average of 877.4 days for DTG; average of 788.8 study days for EFV/TDF/FTC)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ACTG virologic failuresCensored participants
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily11403
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily8411

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Genotypic Resistance With Virological Failure (VF) Through 144

Whole blood samples were collected from participants to provide plasma for storage samples for potential viral genotypic and phenotypic analyses. Participants with confirmed virological failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL throughout the study and/or confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=200 copies/mL at Week 144) had plasma samples tested for HIV-1 RT genotype and HIV-1 integrase genotype from Baseline samples and from samples collected at the time of virological failure. Genotype testing was conducted at Day 1 and at the time of suspected protocol-defined virological failure (PDVF). A genotyping assessment was made of change across all amino acids within the integrase (IN)-encoding region, with particular attention paid to specific amino acid changes associated with the development of resistance to RAL, ELV, or DTG. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Through Week 144

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 144, RT mutation K65K/RWeek 144, RT mutation K101EWeek 144, RT mutation K103K/NWeek 144, RT mutation K103NWeek 144, RT mutation G190G/A
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily00000
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily11222

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 1 to 4 Clinical and Hematology Toxicities at Week144

All Grade 1 to 4 post-Baseline-emergent chemistry toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), asparate aminotransferase (AST), carbon dioxide (CO2) content/bicarbonate, cholesterol, creatine kinase (CK), creatinine, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol calculation, lipase, phosphorus inorganic, total bilirubin, and triglycerides. All Grade 1 to 4 post-Baseline-emergent hematology toxities included hemoglobin, platelet count, total neutrophils, and white blood cell count. The Division of AIDS (DAIDS) defined toxicity grades as follows: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening; Grade 5, death. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 144

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 144, ALTWeek 144, AlbuminWeek 144, ALPWeek 144, ASTWeek 144, CO2 content/bicarbonateWeek 144, CholesterolWeek 144, CKWeek 144, CreatinineWeek 144, HyperglycaemiaWeek 144, HyperkalemiaWeek 144, HypernatremiaWeek 144, HypoglycaemiaWeek 144, HypokalemiaWeek 144, HyponatremiaWeek 144, LDL cholesterol calculationWeek 144, LipaseWeek 144, Phosphorus, inorganicWeek 144, Total bilirubinWeek 144, TriglyceridesWeek 144, HemoglobinWeek 144, Platelet countWeek 144, Total neutrophilsWeek 144, White Blood Cell count
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily620177713515691171214112438631241111092211720709
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily811538513414079610512921218611111013441111198018

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Post-baseline HIV-associated Conditions and Progression, Excluding Recurrences at Week 144

Clinical disease progression (CDP) was assessed according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HIV-1 classification system. Category (CAT) A: one or more of the following conditions (CON), without any CON listed in Categories B and C: asymptomatic HIV infection, persistent generalized lymphadenopathy, acute (primary) HIV infection with accompanying illness or history of acute HIV infection. CAT B: symptomatic CON that are attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or that are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection; and not included among CON listed in clinical CAT C. CAT C: the clinical CON listed in the AIDS surveillance case definition. Indicators of CDP were defined as: CDC CAT A at Baseline (BS) to a CDC CAT C event (EV); CDC CAT B at BS to a CDC CAT C EV; CDC CAT C at BS to a new CDC CAT C EV; or CDC CAT A, B, or C at BS to death. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 144

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 144, Any category conditionWeek 144, Any Category B conditionWeek 144, Any Category C conditionWeek 144, Any deathWeek 144, Progression from CAT A to CAT CWeek 144, Progression from CAT C to new CAT CWeek 144, Progression from CAT A, B, or C to death
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily171250410
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily241762422

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Responding Based on Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48

The percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48 was assessed. Plasma samples were collected for the quantitative assessment of HIV-1 RNA based on the Missing, Switch, or Discontinuation equals Failure (MSDF) algorithm,as codified by the Food and Drug Administration's Snapshot algorithm. This algorithm treats all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigationl product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) in certain scenarios. Since changes in ART were not permitted in this protocol, all such participants who changed ART were to be considered non-responders. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was to be determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on treatment within the visit of interest window. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily88
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily81

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 96 and Week 144

The percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96 and Week 144 was assessed. Plasma samples were collected for the quantitative assessment of HIV-1 RNA based on the Missing, Switch, or Discontinuation equals Failure (MSDF) algorithm,as codified by the Food and Drug Administration's Snapshot algorithm. This algorithm treats all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigationl product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) in certain scenarios. Since changes in ART were not permitted in this protocol, all such participants who changed ART were to be considered non-responders. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was to be determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on treatment within the visit of interest window. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Week 96 and Week 144

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 96Week 144
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily7771
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily7063

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144

Cluster of differentiation (CD4) lymphocyte cells (also called T-cells or T-helper cells) are the primary targets of HIV. The CD4 count and the CD4 percentage mark the degree of immunocompromise. The CD4 count is used to stage the patient's disease, determine the risk of opportunistic illnesses, assess prognosis, and guide decisions about when to start antiretroviral therapy. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 144 value minus the Baseline value. The least squares mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts at Week 144 calculated from a repeated measures model including the following covariates: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment*visit interaction, Baseline HIV-1 RNA*visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count*visit interaction. No assumptions were made about the correlations between a participant's readings of CD4+, i.e., the correlation matrix for within-participant errors is unstructured. (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 144

Interventioncells per millimeters cubed (cells/mm^3) (Least Squares Mean)
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily378.48
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily331.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Symptom Bother Score (SBS) at Week 4 Through Week 48

"The Symptom Distress Module (SDM) is a 20-item, self-reported questionnaire measuring the presence/perceived distress linked to symptoms associated with HIV/its treatments. Developed with support from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, it has demonstrated construct validity and has shown strong associations with physical/mental health summary scores and with disease severity. The SDM consists of 2 main scores: symptom count and the SBS, ranging from 0 (best) to 80 (worst) and based on the degree of bother that each symptom present posed. The SBS was calculated by adding the 20 individual bother item scores, which were calculated as: 0, I do not have this symptom; 1, It doesn't bother me; 2, It bothers me a little; 3, It bothers me; 4, It bothers me a lot. Estimates are calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for age, sex, race, Baseline (BL) viral load, BL CD4+ cell count, and BL SBS." (NCT01263015)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 through 48

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
DTG 50 mg Plus ABC/3TC 600/300 mg Once Daily-1.818
EFV/TDF/FTC 600/200/300 mg Once Daily-1.246

[back to top]

Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, Participants With Viral Resistance

Resistance Analysis Set: participants with either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and < 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with > 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis. (NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline through Week 48Week 48 through Week 96Baseline through Week 96
EFV/FTC/TDF314
FTC/RPV/TDF17421

[back to top]

Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, All Participants

Participants who experienced either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed for resistance. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and < 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with > 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis. (NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline through Week 48Week 48 through Week 96Baseline through Week 96
EFV/FTC/TDF0.80.31.0
FTC/RPV/TDF4.31.05.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm. (NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TDF77.9
EFV/FTC/TDF72.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF-8
EFV/FTC/TDF8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF1
EFV/FTC/TDF22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

"The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm.~The snapshot algorithm defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time." (NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TDF85.8
EFV/FTC/TDF81.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventioncells/μL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF200
EFV/FTC/TDF191

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 48

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF1
EFV/FTC/TDF14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 48

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF2
EFV/FTC/TDF8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96

(NCT01309243)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

Interventioncells/μL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TDF278
EFV/FTC/TDF259

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Suppression

HIV-1 RNA suppression was defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL. Only Arm A participants could enter Step 2 to initiate delayed ET. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: Entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48, 72, 96; Step 2 entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48 and 72.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Entry: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 12: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 24: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 32: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 48: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 72: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 96: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 entry: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 Week 12: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 Week 24: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 Week 32: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 Week 48: HIV-1 RNA suppressionStep 2 Week 72: HIV-1 RNA suppression
Arm A: ART Alone or With Delayed ET4.390.394.592.095.391.292.993.3100.095.896.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Etoposide Dose Modification

Etoposide (ET) was administered for a maximum of 8 cycles (16 weeks) from study entry (Arm B) or from Step 2 entry (Arm A). Dose modifications were reported as temporarily held, resumed at a different dose, deferred, prematurely discontinued and underdosed. The percentage of participants who experienced each dose modification is provided in the data table below. The categories are not mutually exclusive. A participant may have experienced multiple dose modifications and may be counted in more than one category. Each participant is counted at most once within category. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From ET dispensation to ET discontinuation (total duration of ET was up to 16 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temporarily heldResumed at a different doseDeferredDiscontinuedUnderdosed
Arm A: ART With Delayed ET (Step 2)015.637.56.30
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET5.29.424.010.41.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Suppression

HIV-1 RNA suppression was defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL. Only Arm A participants could enter Step 2 to initiate delayed ET. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: Entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48, 72, 96; Step 2 entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48 and 72.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Entry: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 12: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 24: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 32: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 48: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 72: HIV-1 RNA suppressionWeek 96: HIV-1 RNA suppression
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET4.290.697.594.798.696.693.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Partial or Complete Response by Week 96

KS partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) compared to study entry based on clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). Cumulative incidence was estimated with death and initiation of delayed KS treatment (alternate KS treatment or delayed ET in Arm A) as competing risks. Time at risk was censored at the end of Step 1 (Week 96 or premature study discontinuation) or on the date when the DSMB's recommendation to close the study became public, whichever occurred earlier. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From entry through 96 weeks

Interventioncumulative events per 100 participants (Number)
Arm A: ART Alone Period (Step 1)39.89
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET64.08

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Progressive Disease by Week 96

KS progressive disease (PD) compared to study entry or best response based on clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). Cumulative incidence was estimated with death and initiation of alternate KS treatment as competing risks. Time at risk was censored at the end of Step 1 (Week 96 or premature study discontinuation) or on the date when the DSMB's recommendation to close the study became public, whichever occurred earlier. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From entry through 96 weeks

Interventioncumulative events per 100 participants (Number)
Arm A: ART Alone Period (Step 1)60.61
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET52.73

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of KS Progressive Disease After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A

KS progressive disease (PD) compared to Step 2 entry (prior to initiation of delayed ET) or Step 2 best response based on clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). Cumulative incidence was estimated with death and initiation of alternate KS treatment as competing risks. Time at risk was censored at the end of Step 2 (at up to 84 weeks or premature study discontinuation) or on the date when the DSMB's recommendation to close the study became public, whichever occurred earlier. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From initiation of etoposide (Step 2 entry) to up to 84 weeks (end of Step 2)

Interventioncumulative events per 100 participants (Number)
Arm A: ART With Delayed ET Period (Step 2)35.78

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of KS Response After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A

KS response, partial or complete (PR or CR) compared to Step 2 entry (prior to initiation of delayed ET) based on clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). Cumulative incidence was estimated with death and initiation of alternate KS treatment as competing risks. Time at risk was censored at the end of Step 2 (at up to 84 weeks or premature study discontinuation) or on the date when the DSMB's recommendation to close the study became public, whichever occurred earlier. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From initiation of etoposide (Step 2 entry) to up to 84 weeks (end of Step 2)

Interventioncumulative events per 100 participants (Number)
Arm A: ART With Delayed ET Period (Step 2)62.57

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of KS-IRIS

KS-IRIS was defined as KS progressive disease that occurs within 12 weeks of initiation of ART that is associated with an increase in peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocyte cell count of at least 50 cells/mm^3 above the study screening value and/or a decrease in the HIV RNA level by at least 0.5 log10 below the study entry value prior to, or at the time of, documented KS progressive disease. Cumulative incidence was estimated with death and initiation of alternate KS treatment as competing risks. Time at risk was censored (1) when lost to follow-up, (2) at the study visit following Week 12 or (3) on the date when the DSMB's recommendation to close the study became public, whichever occurred earlier. Time of KS-IRIS was defined as the time of the initial KS progressive disease. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From study entry to Week 12

Interventioncumulative events per 100 participants (Number)
Arm A: ART Alone or With Delayed ET23.14
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET7.40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Number of participants who experienced an AE (sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality) of Grade 3 or higher. The AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see reference in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From study treatment dispensation through up to Week 96, until long-term follow-up began in Step 3 or until study discontinuation.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: ART Alone or With Delayed ET47
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET42

[back to top]

Change in Peripheral Blood CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count

Absolute change in CD4+ cell count was calculated as value at a given visit minus the value at study screening in Step 1, and as value at a given visit minus Step 2 entry in Step 2. Only participants in Arm A could enter Step 2 to initiate delayed ET. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: Screening and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48, 72, 96; Step 2 entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48 and 72.

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
Week 12: CD4 changeWeek 24: CD4 changeWeek 32: CD4 changeWeek 48: CD4 changeWeek 72: CD4 changeWeek 96: CD4 changeStep 2 Week 12: CD4 changeStep 2 Week 24: CD4 changeStep 2 Week 32: CD4 changeStep 2 Week 48: CD4 changeStep 2 Week 72: CD4 change
Arm A: ART Alone or With Delayed ET405790125143149-13-1528251

[back to top]

Change in Peripheral Blood CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count

Absolute change in CD4+ cell count was calculated as value at a given visit minus the value at study screening in Step 1, and as value at a given visit minus Step 2 entry in Step 2. Only participants in Arm A could enter Step 2 to initiate delayed ET. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: Screening and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48, 72, 96; Step 2 entry and Weeks 12, 24, 32, 48 and 72.

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
Week 12: CD4 changeWeek 24: CD4 changeWeek 32: CD4 changeWeek 48: CD4 changeWeek 72: CD4 changeWeek 96: CD4 change
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET67121119121125206

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ARV Dose Modification

ARV dose modifications were reported as temporarily held, prematurely discontinued and increased. The percentage of participants who experienced each dose modification is provided in the data table below. The categories are not mutually exclusive. A participant may have experienced multiple dose modifications and may be counted in more than one category. Each participant is counted at most once within category. (NCT01352117)
Timeframe: From treatment dispensation to Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temporarily heldPrematurely discontinuedIncreased
Arm A: ART Alone or With Delayed ET7.426.61.1
Arm B: ART With Immediate ET11.521.90

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of First AIDS Progression by Week 96

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of first AIDS progression which was defined as the identification of a new World Health Organization (WHO) stage 3 or 4 condition (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm A: Empiric16.6
Arm B: IPT11.3

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy by Week 48

Proportion of participants with premature discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) by Week 48 (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.19
Arm B: IPT0.21

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Any Component of TB Treatment by Week 48

Proportion of participants with premature discontinuation of any component of TB treatment by Week 48 (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.13
Arm B: IPT0.05

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48

Proportion of participants with at least one new Grade 3 or 4 laboratory or sign or symptom that is at least a one-grade increase from baseline by Week 48. Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-Threatening according to DAIDS AE Grading Table (see references). (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.32
Arm B: IPT0.30

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Targeted Laboratory Value That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48

"Proportion of participants with at least one new Grade 3 or 4 that is at least a one-grade increase from baseline for the following targeted laboratory values by Week 48~The targeted laboratory events include hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ALT and AST" (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48. The lab events were collected at study entry, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 48.

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.11
Arm B: IPT0.13

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) by Week 48

Proportion of participants with IRIS (using current ACTG definition Appendix 60, see References) by Week 48. IRIS in participants with TB and other opportunistic infections may occur shortly after the initiation of potent combination ART, particularly in participants with advanced HIV disease. (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.04
Arm B: IPT0.05

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Reportable Hospitalization by Week 48

Proportion of participants with reportable hospitalization reported by Week 48 (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.10
Arm B: IPT0.12

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Death or Unknown Vital Status by Week 24

"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or unknown vital status by week 24.~The vital status was considered unknown at week 24 if a participant prematurely discontinued from the study before week 24 and no vital status was obtained at week 48." (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm A: Empiric5.2
Arm B: IPT5.2

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of TB Treatment by Week 96

Median time to TB treatment initiation since study entry (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm A: Empiric0
Arm B: IPT0

[back to top]

CD4+ T-cell Count

The absolute levels of CD4+ T-cell counts (cells/mm^3) (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: At weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48

,
Interventioncells/ mm^3 (Median)
Week 0Week 4Week 24Week 48
Arm A: Empiric1874121176
Arm B: IPT1976121172

[back to top]

CD4+ T-cell Count Change From Baseline

Change was calculated as the CD4+ T-cell count at the later weeks (4, 24 and 48) minus the baseline (week 0) CD4+ T-cell count. (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 24 and 48

,
Interventioncells/ mm^3 (Median)
Week 4Week 24Week 48
Arm A: Empiric4996158
Arm B: IPT54102146

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL

Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/mL. (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: At weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48

,
InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Week 0Week 4Week 24Week 48
Arm A: Empiric00.460.840.87
Arm B: IPT0.010.490.850.89

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 24

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or AIDS progression by week 24. AIDS progression was defined as new WHO stage 3 or 4 conditions occurred after study entry. (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm A: Empiric17.1
Arm B: IPT12.5

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 48

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or AIDS progression by week 48. AIDS progression was defined as new WHO stage 3 or 4 conditions occurred after study entry. (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm A: Empiric19.3
Arm B: IPT15.3

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Death by Week 24

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative probability of death by week 24 (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm A: Empiric4.8
Arm B: IPT5.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With TB Diagnosis by Week 96

Proportion of participants with TB diagnosis per current ACTG Diagnosis Appendix 60 by week 96 (NCT01380080)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Empiric0.08
Arm B: IPT0.05

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, Virologic Failure, or KS-IRIS by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, AIDS defining event, virologic failure, or KS-IRIS. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART54.5
PTX+ART36.2

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, or Virologic Failure by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, AIDS defining event, or virologic failure by week 48 (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART77.5
PTX+ART54.6

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, or Virologic Failure by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, AIDS defining event, or virologic failure by week 48 (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART60.9
PTX+ART42.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of IERC-confirmed KS Progression by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of IERC-confirmed KS progression by week 48. IERC-confirmed KS progression was defined as KS disease progression confirmed by the IERC based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART69.8
PTX+ART41.2

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of IERC-confirmed KS Progression by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of IERC-confirmed KS progression by week 48. IERC-confirmed KS progression was defined as KS disease progression confirmed by the IERC based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART43.9
PTX+ART25.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

Virologic failure is defined as two successive measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA >=1000 copies/mL at week 12 to week 24 or RNA >=400 copies/mL at week 24 or later. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART7.4
PTX+ART1.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Death for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of death. Time to death was computed as the number of weeks between study entry and date of death. For participants who did not have the event, time to death was censored at the week of last contact with the participant or at the participant's off study week, whichever is later. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 240

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART25.6
PTX+ART10.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Death for BV+ART vs PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of death. Time to death was computed as the number of weeks between study entry and date of death. For participants who did not have the event, time to death was censored at the week of last contact with the participant or at the participant's off study week, whichever is later. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 240

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART18.5
PTX+ART10.3

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Death by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of death by week 48. Time to death was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to date of death. For participants who did have the event, time to death was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Time to death above 48 were censored at week 48. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART25.6
PTX+ART10.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Death by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of death by week 48. Time to death was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to the death date. For participants who did have the event, time to death was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Time to death above 48 were censored at week 48. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART18.5
PTX+ART10.3

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Change in KS Treatment by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of change in KS treatment by week 48. Change in KS treatment was defined as stopping Step 1 randomized chemotherapy and initiating a different chemotherapy. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART59.5
PTX+ART26.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Change in KS Treatment by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of change in KS treatment by week 48. Change in KS treatment was defined as stopping Step 1 randomized chemotherapy and initiating a different chemotherapy. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART32.5
PTX+ART18.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Response for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The number of participants with objective response (complete response or partial response) as best overall KS response in Step 1. Overall KS response status (complete response, partial response, stable, disease progression) was based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry up to week 144

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ET+ART18
PTX+ART34

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

Virologic failure is defined as two successive measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA >=1000 copies/mL at week 12 to week 24 or RNA >=400 copies/mL at week 24 or later. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART7.8
PTX+ART0.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of AIDS-defining Event by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of AIDS-defining events by week 48. AIDS-defining events refer to non-KS AIDS-defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2007), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis, Chagas disease and visceral leishmaniasis). Time to event was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to the first AIDS-defining event. For participants who did not have any of the events, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Follow-up time beyond 48 was censored at week 48. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART15.2
PTX+ART28.6

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of AIDS-defining Event by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of AIDS-defining events by week 48. AIDS-defining events refer to non-KS AIDS-defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2007), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis, Chagas disease and visceral leishmaniasis). Time to event was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to the first AIDS-defining event. For participants who did not have any of the events, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Follow-up time beyond 48 was censored at week 48. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART17.9
PTX+ART19.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Kaposi's Sarcoma-Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (KS-IRIS) for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

KS-IRIS is defined as any IERC-confirmed KS-progression that occurs within 12 weeks of ART-initiation that is associated with an increase in CD4 cell count of at least 50 cells/mm^3 above the study entry value and/or a decrease in the HIV-1 RNA level by at least 0.5 log below the study entry value prior to or at the time of documented KS progression. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ET+ART6
PTX+ART0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Kaposi's Sarcoma-Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (KS-IRIS) for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

KS-IRIS is defined as any IERC-confirmed KS-progression that occurs within 12 weeks of ART-initiation that is associated with an increase in CD4 cell count of at least 50 cells/mm^3 above the study entry value and/or a decrease in the HIV-1 RNA level by at least 0.5 log below the study entry value prior to or at the time of documented KS progression. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BV+ART2
PTX+ART0

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

Duration of objective response is the number of weeks from first complete or partial response to the earliest among progression, death or off study week. The 25th percentile duration is presented. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry up to week 144

Interventionweeks (Number)
ET+ART10.1
PTX+ART19.9

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

Duration of objective response is the number of weeks from first complete or partial response to the earliest among progression, death or off study week. The 25th percentile duration is presented. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry up to week 144

Interventionweeks (Number)
ET+ART21.0
PTX+ART45.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Progression-Free Survival by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

Progression-free survival (PFS) by week 48 is defined as a lack of the following events: (a) Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)-confirmed KS progression, (b) death, (c) entry into an additional step, or (d) loss to follow-up, prior to week 48. PFS rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival probability at week 48. Time to event was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to the first among these events. For participants who did not have any of the events, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Follow-up time beyond 48 was censored at week 48. Overall KS outcome status (complete response, partial response, stable, disease progression) was based on comparing follow-up to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART19.7
PTX+ART49.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of Progression-Free Survival by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

Progression-free survival (PFS) by week 48 is defined as a lack of the following events: (a) Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)-confirmed KS progression, (b) death, (c) entry into an additional step, or (d) loss to follow-up, prior to week 48. PFS rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival probability at week 48. Time to event was computed as the number of weeks from study entry to the first among these events. For participants who did not have any of the events, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant. Follow-up time beyond 48 was censored at week 48. Overall KS outcome status (complete response, partial response, stable, disease progression) was based on comparing follow-up to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART44.1
PTX+ART64.2

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, or AIDS Defining Event by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, or AIDS defining event by week 48 (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART72.4
PTX+ART54.6

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, or AIDS Defining Event by Week 48 for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, or AIDS defining event by week 48 (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
BV+ART56.7
PTX+ART42.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Rate of KS Progression, Death, AIDS Defining Event, Virologic Failure, or KS-IRIS by Week 48 for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative rate of KS progression, death, AIDS defining event, virologic failure, or KS-IRIS. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

InterventionCumulative events per 100 persons (Number)
ET+ART57.6
PTX+ART33.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Response for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

The number of participants with objective response (complete response or partial response) as best overall KS response in Step 1. Overall KS response status (complete response, partial response, stable, disease progression) was based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry up to week 144

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BV+ART80
PTX+ART91

[back to top]

Time to IERC-confirmed KS Progression or Death for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

Time to IERC-confirmed KS progression or death was computed as the number of weeks between study entry and the earlier between date of IERC-confirmed KS progression or date of death. For participants who did not have the event, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant or at the participant's off study week, whichever is later.The 25-th percentile and hazard ratio are presented. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 240

Interventionweeks (Number)
BV+ART24.7
PTX+ART38.6

[back to top]

Time to IERC-confirmed KS Progression or Death for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

Time to IERC-confirmed KS progression or death was computed as the number of weeks between study entry and the earlier between date of IERC-confirmed KS progression or date of death. For participants who did not have the event, event time was censored at the week of last contact with the participant or the participant's off study week, whichever is later. The 25-th percentile and hazard ratio are presented. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From study entry to week 240

Interventionweeks (Number)
ET+ART17.9
PTX+ART30.0

[back to top]

Changes in CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count for BV+ART vs. PTX+ART

Baseline CD4 lymphocyte cell count is the mean of screening and Step 1 entry CD4 values. Absolute change in CD4+ lymphocyte cell count was calculated as value at a given visit minus the baseline CD4 lymphocyte cell count. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 12, 24, 48

,
Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
Week 12 CD4 changeWeek 24 CD4 changeWeek 48 CD4 change
BV+ART2143112
PTX+ART3765105

[back to top]

Changes in CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count for ET+ART vs. PTX+ART

Baseline CD4 lymphocyte cell count is the mean of screening and Step 1 entry CD4 values. Absolute change in CD4+ lymphocyte cell count was calculated as value at a given visit minus the baseline CD4 lymphocyte cell count. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 12, 24, 48

,
Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
Week 12 CD4 changeWeek 24 CD4 changeWeek 48 CD4 change
ET+ART3710669
PTX+ART4795157

[back to top]

Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 2

IERC-confirmed KS progression refers to KS disease progression confirmed by the IERC based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). AIDS-defining events refer to non-KS AIDS-defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2007), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis, Chagas disease and visceral leishmaniasis). Virologic failure is defined as two successive measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA >=1000 copies/mL at week 12 to week 24 or RNA >=400 copies/mL at week 24 or later. Objective response refers to complete response or partial response as best overall KS response. Results are presented by Step 2 treatment arm. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From Step 2 study entry to Step 2 discontinuation, up to 144 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With IERC-confirmed KS progressionWith dose-limiting toxicityDiedWith AIDS-defining eventsWith virologic failureWith objective response
BV+ART101127
ET+ART100010
PTX+ART105015

[back to top]

Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 3

IERC-confirmed KS progression refers to KS disease progression confirmed by the IERC based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). AIDS-defining events refer to non-KS AIDS-defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2007), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis, Chagas disease and visceral leishmaniasis). Virologic failure is defined as two successive measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA >=1000 copies/mL at week 12 to week 24 or RNA >=400 copies/mL at week 24 or later. Objective response refers to complete response or partial response as best overall KS response. Results are presented by Step 3 treatment arm. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From Step 3 study entry to Step 3 discontinuation, up to 144 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With IERC-confirmed KS progressionWith dose-limiting toxicityDiedWith AIDS-defining eventsWith virologic failureWith objective response
BV+ART6035218
ET+ART200025
PTX+ART8077129

[back to top]

Number of Participants With IERC-Confirmed KS Disease Progression, Dose-Limiting Toxicity, Death, AIDS-Defining Events, Virologic Failure and Objective Response in Step 4

IERC-confirmed KS progression refers to KS disease progression confirmed by the IERC based on comparing follow-up KS response to study entry or best KS response with respect to clinical assessment of KS cutaneous lesions (count, character and marker lesion area), oral KS, visceral KS and tumor-associated edema and as described in the publications (Krown et al 1989, Cianfrocca et al 2002). AIDS-defining events refer to non-KS AIDS-defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2007), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis, Chagas disease and visceral leishmaniasis). Virologic failure is defined as two successive measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA >=1000 copies/mL at week 12 to week 24 or RNA >=400 copies/mL at week 24 or later. Objective response refers to complete response or partial response as best overall KS response. Results are presented by Step 4 treatment arm. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: From Step 4 study entry to Step 4 discontinuation, up to 96 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With IERC-confirmed KS progressionWith dose-limiting toxicityDiedWith AIDS-defining eventsWith virologic failureWith objective response
BV+ART203013
PTX+ART302003

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Peripheral Neuropathy (PN)

Presence of PN is defined as having all of the following results: presence of symptomatic PN, abnormal perception of vibrations, and absent or hypoactive deep tendon reflexes. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: Screening, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21. Assessment of PN for ET+ART was only done at screening, weeks 9 and 21.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ScreeningWeek 3Week 6Week 9Week 12Week 15Week 18Week 21
BV+ART71133265
ET+ART10000000
PTX+ART00224312

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Symptomatic Peripheral Neuropathy (SPN)

"SPN consists of three assessments: (1) pain, aching or burning in feet, legs, (2) pins and needles in feet, legs, and (3) numbness (lack of feeling) in feet, legs. SPN is graded on a severity scale from 0 (not present), 1 (mild) to 10 (severe). Presence of SPN is defined as having grade >=1 in at least one of the three assessments." (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: Screening, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21. Assessment of SPN for ET+ART was only done at screening, weeks 9 and 21.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ScreeningWeek 3Week 6Week 9Week 12Week 15Week 18Week 21
BV+ART7662464036262530
ET+ART2400140004
PTX+ART5934322723161520

[back to top] [back to top]

Self-reported Adherence to ART Therapy

ART adherence is based on participant's recall of the number of missed ART doses for the past month. Perfect adherence is defined as having zero missed ART doses. (NCT01435018)
Timeframe: At Weeks 6, 12, 18, 30 and 48

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 6 Perfect AdherenceWeek 12 Perfect AdherenceWeek 18 Perfect adherenceWeek 30 Perfect adherenceWeek 48 Perfect adherence
BV+ART101101856613
ET+ART433629130
PTX+ART106103978520

[back to top]

Adherence to ART Regimen (Percentage of Pills Taken)

To determine percentage of ART pills taken by participants randomized to immediate and deferred ART initiation. (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionPercent of dispensed pills taken (Mean)
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)93.6
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)91.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Diagnosed With Acute HIV Infection Who Were Linked to Care

To determine the proportion of individuals with evidence of acute infection (HIV-1 RNA-positive) who are successfully contacted for confirmatory HIV testing and are then linked to care. (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: within 3 months of diagnosis of acute HIV infection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute71

[back to top]

Partner Tracing

Partner tracing and notification (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: within 3 months of diagnosis

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HIV Positive Participants0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Whose HIV Sequences Appear in Phylogenetically Defined Clusters

HIV present in blood samples from recently infected study participants was sequenced. Sequences that were similar to each other were grouped together in clusters. For this analysis, clusters were defined using a patristic distance threshold of 0.01, and a minimum cluster size of two. (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: HIV diagnosis visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cluster Membership27

[back to top]

Adherence to CD4 Procedure

To determine the number of participants who had a CD4 test at Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CD4 at BaselineCD4 at Week 12CD4 at Week 24CD4 at Week 36CD4 at Week 48
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)11010410410098
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)10399979796

[back to top]

Adherence to Questionnaires

To determine the number of participants who completed the Computer Assisted Self interviews (CASI) at Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CASI at BaselineCASI at Week 12CASI at Week 24CASI at Week 36CASI at Week 48
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)1091021009992
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)10096959290

[back to top]

Adherence to Viral Load (VL) Procedure

To determine the number of participants who had a viral load test at Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
VL at BaselineVL at Week 12VL at Week 24VL at week 36VL at Week 48
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)1111041049998
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)10598959695

[back to top]

Number of Participants Retained in Care

To determine the number of participants who were retained in care at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Retained at Week 12Retained at Week 24Retained at Week 36Retained at Week 48
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)106105103101
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)1021019896

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HIV Viral Load Suppression in Plasma

To quantify HIV viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL) in plasma at Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks Suppressed at Baseline = HIV Viral load measured at the time of enrollment was <1000 copies/mL Suppressed at Week 12 = HIV Viral load measured 12 weeks after enrollment was <1000 copies/mL etc. (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Suppressed at BaselineSuppressed at week 12Suppressed at week 24Suppressed at week 36Suppressed at week 48
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)18188992
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)284939194

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HIV Viral Load Suppression in Semen

To quantify HIV viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL) in semen at Baseline and weeks 12, and, 24 weeks (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Suppressed BaselineSuppressed week 12Suppressed week 24
Deferred ART (Atripla or Stribild)7179
Immediate ART (Atripla or Stribild)42119

[back to top]

Sequence Clusters Identified Using Phylogenetic Analysis Among Participants With Early HIV Infection

HIV present in blood samples from recently infected study participants was sequenced. Sequences that were similar to each other were grouped together in clusters. For this analysis, clusters were defined using a patristic distance threshold of 0.01, and a minimum cluster size of two. (NCT01815580)
Timeframe: HIV diagnosis visit

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heavy drinker71951426Heavy drinker71951427Audit Score >=2071951426Audit Score >=2071951427Any illicit drug use71951426Any illicit drug use71951427Sex Work71951426Sex Work71951427Met a sex partner at any venue71951426Met a sex partner at any venue71951427
YesNoMissing data
Not in Cluster30
In a Cluster14
Not in Cluster57
In a Cluster26
Not in Cluster52
In a Cluster22
Not in Cluster16
In a Cluster4
Not in Cluster117
In a Cluster49
Not in Cluster6
In a Cluster9
Not in Cluster13
Not in Cluster126
In a Cluster58
Not in Cluster0
In a Cluster0
In a Cluster5
Not in Cluster123
In a Cluster56
In a Cluster1
Not in Cluster62
In a Cluster37
Not in Cluster77
In a Cluster25

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TAF0.7
EFV/FTC/TDF0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HIV Symptoms Index Score (HIVSI) at Week 48

The HIV Symptoms Index was a 20-item, self-reported measure that addressed presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Twenty HIV symptoms including Fatigue, Fever, Dizziness, Hand/Foot Pain, Memory Loss, Nausea, Diarrhea, Sadness, Nervous/anxious, Sleep Trouble, Skin Problems, Cough, Headache, Appetite Loss, Stomach Pain, Muscle/Joint Pain, Sex Problems, Change in Fat Deposits, Weight Loss, and Hair Loss were assessed. There were 5 possible responses (0 = I don't have this symptom; 1 = It doesn't bother me; 2 = It bothers me a little; 3 = It bothers me; and 4 = It bothers me a lot) for each HIV symptom. Total HIV Symptoms Index Score was derived from all 20 HIV symptoms by counting the number of bothersome symptoms. Total score would be missing if any of the individual items were missing. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF0
EFV/FTC/TDF-1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48

(NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF23
EFV/FTC/TDF12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96

(NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF12
EFV/FTC/TDF6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HIVSI Score at Week 96

The HIV Symptoms Index was a 20-item, self-reported measure that addressed presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Twenty HIV symptoms including Fatigue, Fever, Dizziness, Hand/Foot Pain, Memory Loss, Nausea, Diarrhea, Sadness, Nervous/anxious, Sleep Trouble, Skin Problems, Cough, Headache, Appetite Loss, Stomach Pain, Muscle/Joint Pain, Sex Problems, Change in Fat Deposits, Weight Loss, and Hair Loss were assessed. There were 5 possible responses (0 = I don't have this symptom; 1 = It doesn't bother me; 2 = It bothers me a little; 3 = It bothers me; and 4 = It bothers me a lot) for each HIV symptom. Total HIV Symptoms Index Score was derived from all 20 HIV symptoms by counting the number of bothersome symptoms. Total score would be missing if any of the individual items were missing. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF0
EFV/FTC/TDF-1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip BMD at Week 96

Hip BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF1.831
EFV/FTC/TDF-0.617

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Hip BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF1.279
EFV/FTC/TDF-0.134

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF1.645
EFV/FTC/TDF-0.045

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
FTC/RPV/TAF1.701
EFV/FTC/TDF0.126

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TAF90.0
EFV/FTC/TDF92.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TAF85.2
EFV/FTC/TDF85.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02345226)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FTC/RPV/TAF1.1
EFV/FTC/TDF0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts at Week 48

The mean change from baseline in CD4 cell counts at Week 48 was assessed using the Observed Failure (OF) approach. With the OF approach, baseline values were carried forward for participants who discontinued prior to Week 48 due to lack of efficacy. Cell counts at Baseline and Week 48 were measured and expressed as cells/mm^3, and percent change was then calculated as [(Baseline counts - Week 48 counts)*100]. CD4 cell counts were quantified by a central laboratory using a commercially available assay. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A198.4
ATRIPLA™188.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tier-1 Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events (AEs)

"The percentage of participants in each arm experiencing ≥1 pre-specified Tier-1 neuropsychiatric AEs was determined. The list of Tier-1 neuropsychiatric AE categories included dizziness, sleep disorders and disturbances, and altered sensorium (including disturbance in attention)." (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
DizzinessSleep disorders and disturbancesAltered sensorium
ATRIPLA™37.125.58.2
MK-1439A8.812.14.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Cholesterol at Week 48

The mean percent change from baseline in fasting (fast duration of ≥8 hours) cholesterol levels at Week 48 was determined for each arm. The LOCF approach was applied to missing data and data collected after a participant initiated lipid-modifying therapy. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A-1.97
ATRIPLA™21.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48

The mean percent change from baseline in fasting (fast duration of ≥8 hours) triglycerides levels at Week 48 was determined for each arm. The LOCF approach was applied to missing data and data collected after a participant initiated lipid-modifying therapy. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A-12.40
ATRIPLA™22.01

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to an AE(s)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MK-1439A3.0
ATRIPLA™6.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C at Week 48

The mean percent change from baseline in fasting (fast duration of ≥8 hours) non-HDL-C levels at Week 48 was determined for each arm. The LOCF approach was applied to missing data and data collected after a participant initiated lipid-modifying therapy. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A-3.83
ATRIPLA™13.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 AE

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MK-1439A82.7
ATRIPLA™90.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL at Week 48

"The percentage of participants in each arm with HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at Week 48 was determined. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were quantified with the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay. Data were handled according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot approach in which all missing data are considered treatment failures, regardless of the reason." (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-1439A84.3
ATRIPLA™80.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies/mL at Week 48

"The percentage of participants in each arm with HIV-1 RNA levels <40 copies/mL (including target detected and target not detected) at Week 48 was determined. Plasma HIV RNA levels were quantified with the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay. Data were handled according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot approach in which all missing data are considered treatment failures, regardless of the reason." (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-1439A83.8
ATRIPLA™79.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Below the Limit of Quantification (BLoQ) at Week 48

The percentage of participants in each arm with HIV-1 RNA levels BLoQ of 40 copies/mL and target not detected at Week 48 was determined. Plasma HIV RNA levels were quantified with the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay. Data were handled as observed. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-1439A59.6
ATRIPLA™55.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tier-2 Neuropsychiatric AEs

"The percentage of participants in each arm experiencing ≥1 pre-specified Tier-2 neuropsychiatric AEs was determined. The list of Tier-2 neuropsychiatric AE categories included depression and suicide/self-injury and psychosis and psychotic disorders." (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Up to Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Depression and suicide/self-injuryPsychosis and psychotic disorders
ATRIPLA™6.61.1
MK-1439A4.10.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Doravirine at Week 48

Plasma samples were collected for analysis of doravirine concentration at Week 48. A total of 2 samples were collected: 1 prior to dosing and 1 collected between 0.5 and 2 hours post-dose. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: 0 hours post-dose and 2 hours post-dose on Week 48

InterventionnM (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 to 2 hours post-dose
MK-1439A12902330

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C at Week 48

The mean percent change from baseline in fasting (fast duration of ≥8 hours) LDL-C levels at Week 48 was determined for each arm. The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) approach was applied to missing data and data collected after a participant initiated lipid-modifying therapy. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A-1.58
ATRIPLA™8.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C at Week 48

The mean percent change from baseline in fasting (fast duration of ≥8 hours) HDL-C levels at Week 48 was determined for each arm. The LOCF approach was applied to missing data and data collected after a participant initiated lipid-modifying therapy. (NCT02403674)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Mean)
MK-1439A1.86
ATRIPLA™8.51

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 and <40 Copies/ml at Week 24 Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups

Blood was collected under fasting conditions at 24 weeks post-switch in order to determine the HIV-1 RNA. For the ISG week 24 post-switch was week 24. For the DSG week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
< 50 copies/mL< 40 copies/mL
Combined Treatment Groups95.395.3

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Lipids Between Time of Switch and Week 24 Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups

Blood was collected under fasting conditions at time of switch and 24 weeks post-switch in order to determine the change from baseline of the following lipids: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; Non high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; cholesterol; HDL cholesterol; and triglyceride. For the ISG time of switch was study Day 1, and week 24 post-switch was week 24. For the DSG time of switch was study week 12, and week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline (time of switch) and 24 weeks post-switch

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
LDL CholesterolNon-HDL CholesterolCholesterolHDL CholesterolTriglyceride
Combined Treatment Groups-10.97-13.18-20.91-7.72-12.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Week 12

Blood was collected under fasting conditions on Day 1 and on week 12 in order to determine the concentration of the following lipids: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; Non high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; cholesterol; HDL cholesterol; and triglyceride. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline (study Day 1) and study week 12

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
LDL CholesterolNon-HDL CholesterolCholesterolHDL CholesterolTriglyceride
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A-1.88-0.370.000.377.10
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A-10.78-14.08-22.14-8.05-21.19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least One CNS Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Week 4

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). Mild = symptom is noticeable but does not interfere with normal activities; moderate = symptom has some impact on normal activities; severe = symptom prevents conduct of normal activities. Percentage of participants with at least one CNS toxicity of Grade 2 or higher were recorded, based on the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A46.5
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A65.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least One CNS Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Time of Switch, and at 24 Weeks Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). Mild = symptom is noticeable but does not interfere with normal activities; moderate = symptom has some impact on normal activities; severe = symptom prevents conduct of normal activities. For the Immediate Switch Group (ISG) time of switch was study Day 1, and week 24 post-switch was week 24. For the Delayed Switch Group (DSG) time of switch was study week 12, and week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline (time of switch) and 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Treatment Groups: Time of Switch68.6
Combined Treatment Groups: Week 24 Post-Switch30.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Central Nervous System (CNS) Toxicity of at Least Grade 2 Intensity at Week 12

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). Mild = symptom is noticeable but does not interfere with normal activities; moderate = symptom has some impact on normal activities; severe = symptom prevents conduct of normal activities. Percentage of participants with at least one CNS toxicity of Grade 2 or higher were recorded, based on the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A41.9
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A37.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More AEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. For the ISG 24 week post-switch was week 24; for the DSG week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Treatment Groups71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) Through Study Week 12

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A34
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A34

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE Through Study Week 12

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A0
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AE for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol - specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. For the ISG 24 week post-switch was week 24; for the DSG week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Treatment Groups0

[back to top]

Change From Time of Switch to Week 24 Post Switch in CD4 T-cell Count for the Combined Treatment Groups

Blood was collected at time of switch and at 24 weeks post-switch in order to determine the CD4 T-cell count. For the ISG time of switch was study Day 1, and week 24 post-switch was week 24. For the DSG time of switch was study week 12, and week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline (time of switch) and 24 weeks post-switch

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Mean)
Combined Treatment Groups70.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CNS Toxicity Score at Week 4

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). Mild = symptom is noticeable but does not interfere with normal activities; moderate = symptom has some impact on normal activities; severe = symptom prevents conduct of normal activities. The CNS toxicity score was calculated by summing across all 10 CNS toxicities and converting the sum to a percentage of the maximum possible sum of intensities (10 x 3 = 30). A positive change from baseline score indicates worsening symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercentage of maximum score (Mean)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A-17.6
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A-15.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CNS Toxicity Score at Week 12

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). Mild = symptom is noticeable but does not interfere with normal activities; moderate = symptom has some impact on normal activities; severe = symptom prevents conduct of normal activities. The CNS toxicity score was calculated by summing across all 10 CNS toxicities and converting the sum to a percentage of the maximum possible sum of intensities (10 x 3 = 30). A positive change from baseline score indicates worsening symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of maximum score (Mean)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A-18.1
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A-21.7

[back to top]

CNS Toxicity Scores at Time of Switch, and at 24 Weeks Post-switch for the Combined Treatment Groups

A questionnaire was used to solicit for CNS toxicity based on the following 10 events: dizziness; depression/low mood; insomnia/sleeplessness; anxiety/nervousness; confusion; impaired concentration/attention; headache; somnolence/daytime sleepiness; aggressive mood/behavior; and abnormal dreams. Participants were asked to rate the intensity for each of the 10 events as none (Grade 0), mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3). The CNS toxicity score was calculated by summing across all 10 CNS toxicities and converting the sum to a percentage of the maximum possible sum of intensities (10 x 3 = 30). A higher CNS score indicates worse symptoms. A positive change in CNS score indicates worsening symptoms. A negative change indicates improvement in symptoms. For the ISG time of switch was study Day 1, and week 24 post-switch was week 24. For the DSG time of switch was study week 12, and week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Baseline (time of switch) and 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionPercentage of maximum score (Mean)
Combined Treatment Groups: Time of Switch24.2
Combined Treatment Groups: Week 24 Post-Switch10.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through Study Week 12

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that results in any of the following: death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is another important medical event; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immediate Switch to MK-1439A0
Deferred Switch to MK-1439A0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More SAEs for the Combined Treatment Groups 24 Weeks After the Switch

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that results in any of the following: death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is another important medical event; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose. For the ISG 24 week post-switch was week 24; for the DSG week 24 post-switch was week 36. (NCT02652260)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-switch

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Treatment Groups1

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Maternal Weight Antepartum

Change in maternal antepartum weight per week based on generalized estimating equations (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Baseline through before delivery (up to one day prior)

Interventionkg/week (Mean)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF0.378
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF0.319
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF0.291

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Infant Deaths

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of infant deaths from birth through 50 weeks after birth. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Birth through 50 weeks after birth

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm 1 Infants1.0
Arm 2 Infants2.0
Arm 3 Infants6.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery Based on FDA Snapshot Algorithm

Percentage of mothers with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL at delivery based on FDA snapshot algorithm using real-time test results obtained from site laboratories (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF88.9
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF92.6
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF81.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at 50 Weeks Postpartum Based on FDA Snapshot Algorithm

Percentage of mothers with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL at 50 weeks postpartum based on FDA snapshot algorithm using real-time test results obtained from site laboratories (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: 50 weeks postpartum

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF75.6
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF77.7
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF76.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Delivery Measured at Central Laboratory

Percentage of mothers with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL at delivery using batched test results obtained from central laboratory (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF94.4
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF78.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at 50 Weeks Postpartum

Percentage of mothers with HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL at 50 weeks postpartum using real-time test results obtained from site laboratories (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: 50 weeks postpartum

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF96.3
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF96.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 ARV Drug Resistance Mutations at the Time of Maternal Virologic Failure

Percentage of mothers with HIV-1 antiretroviral (ARV) drug resistance mutations at the time of maternal virologic failure. Virologic failure was defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA viral loads <200 copies/mL on or after 24 weeks on study. Drug resistance mutations were assessed using the Stanford algorithm, and all ARV regimens were assessed for mutations. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: From 24 weeks after randomization through Week 50 postpartum

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF0.92
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF1.86
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF6.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Mother-Infant Pairs With Preterm Deliveries

Percentage of mother-infant pairs with preterm deliveries (<37 weeks gestation) resulting in live born infant (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF5.8
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF9.4
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF12.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Mother-infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome or Major Congenital Anomaly

Percentage of mother-infant pairs with an adverse pregnancy outcome or major congenital anomaly. Adverse pregnancy outcomes include spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks gestation), stillbirths (≥20 weeks gestation), preterm deliveries (<37 weeks gestation), and infants small for gestational age (<10th percentile per INTERGROWTH 21st Standards). Major congenital anomaly was defined consistent with the definition of malformation provided by Holmes and Westgate (i.e., a structural abnormality with surgical, medical, or cosmetic importance) and evaluated by an internal study team blinded to treatment arm. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery through 50 weeks postpartum

Interventionpercentage of mother-infant pairs (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF24.1
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF32.9
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF33.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Mother-Infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

Percentage of mother-infant pairs with an adverse pregnancy outcome. Adverse pregnancy outcome includes spontaneous abortion (<20 weeks gestation), stillbirth (≥20 weeks gestation), preterm delivery (<37 completed weeks), or small for gestational age (<10th percentile per INTERGROWTH 21st Standards) (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

Interventionpercentage of mother-infant pairs (Number)
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF28.4
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF32.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Infants Born Small for Gestational Age

Percentage of infants born small for gestational age (<10th percentile adjusted for sex assigned at birth) based on Intergrowth 21st Standards (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Birth

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1 Infants16.3
Arm 2 Infants22.5
Arm 3 Infants20.5

[back to top]

Maternal Change in Creatinine Clearance

Maternal change in creatinine clearance per week based on generalized estimating equations (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Baseline to 50 weeks postpartum

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF-0.980
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF-0.887
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF-0.935

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Women Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event

"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of women experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events, including events resulting in death due to any cause.~Time to first maternal grade 3 or higher adverse event was defined as the first grade 3 or higher adverse event that occurred after randomization and before 74 weeks of follow-up. The timeframe of 74 weeks was determined by adding up 56 weeks of postpartum follow-up to the mean duration of antepartum follow-up, which was 18 weeks." (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 74 weeks

,
InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF25.1
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF30.8
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF27.9
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF27.9
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF27.9

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Infants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of infants experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events, including events resulting in death due to any cause. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: From birth through Week 50 postpartum

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm 1 Infants25.3
Arm 2 Infants28.6
Arm 3 Infants30.9

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Infants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of infants experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events, including events resulting in death due to any cause. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Birth through Week 50 postpartum

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arms 1 and 2 Infants26.8
Arm 3 Infants30.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Mother-infant Pairs With an Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

Percentage of mother-infant pairs with an adverse pregnancy outcome. Adverse pregnancy outcome includes spontaneous abortion (<20 weeks gestation), stillbirth (≥20 weeks gestation), preterm delivery (<37 completed weeks), or small for gestational age (<10th percentile by INTERGROWTH 21st Standards) (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

Interventionpercentage of mother-infant pairs (Number)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF24.1
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF32.9
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF32.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Infant HIV-infection

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of infants acquiring HIV-1 infection from birth through 50 weeks after birth based on nucleic acid test results. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Birth through 50 weeks after birth

InterventionCumulative probability per 100 persons (Number)
Arm 1 Infants0.98
Arm 2 Infants0.50
Arm 3 Infants0.55

[back to top]

Percentage of Mothers With HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Delivery

Percentage of mothers with plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load less than 200 copies/mL at delivery determined using real-time test results obtained at site laboratories. This outcome was evaluated in the non-inferiority (primary outcome) and superiority (secondary outcome) analyses. The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomized women who had viral load data available. The per-protocol analysis excluded women who modified randomized treatment (stopped, paused, switched, added any treatment) before viral load evaluation at delivery, with the exception of women who modified randomized treatment for use of a concomitant medication. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intention-to-Treat AnalysisPer-Protocol Analysis
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF91.091.4
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF97.597.5

[back to top]

Count of Infants With HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Mutations at the Time of Infant HIV Diagnosis

Count of infants with HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance mutations (to any antiretroviral drug) at the time of infant HIV diagnosis, based on laboratory blood test results. (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: From birth through 50 weeks postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Infants1
Arm 2 Infants0
Arm 3 Infants1

[back to top]

Change in Maternal Weight Postpartum

Change in maternal postpartum weight per week based on generalized estimating equations (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery to 50 weeks postpartum

Interventionkg/week (Mean)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF0.014
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF-0.008
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF-0.032

[back to top]

Change in Maternal Weight Overall

Change in maternal weight per week based on generalized estimating equations (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Baseline to 50 weeks postpartum

Interventionkg/week (Mean)
Arm 1: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF-0.027
Arm 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TDF-0.050
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF-0.084

[back to top]

Infant Creatinine Clearance

Infant creatinine clearance based on Schwartz formula (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Delivery and 26 weeks postpartum

,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Delivery26 Weeks Postpartum
Arm 1 Infants52.7134.8
Arm 2 Infants53.1123.6
Arm 3 Infants49.0135.0

[back to top]

Time to First HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Through Delivery

Time to first viral HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL through delivery, determined using real-time results obtained from site laboratories (NCT03048422)
Timeframe: Randomization to delivery

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Arms 1 and 2: Maternal DTG+FTC/TAF and DTG+FTC/TDF4.26
Arm 3: Maternal EFV/FTC/TDF6.49

[back to top]